Ananta Ardyansyah, Agung Budhi Yuwono, Sri Rahayu*, Naif Mastoor Alsulami and Oktavia Sulistina,
{"title":"Students’ Perspectives on the Application of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) in Chemistry Learning: A Case Study in Indonesia","authors":"Ananta Ardyansyah, Agung Budhi Yuwono, Sri Rahayu*, Naif Mastoor Alsulami and Oktavia Sulistina, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0022010.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed chatbots into generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) capable of performing various tasks. The use of GPTs is expanding to learning, including natural sciences like chemistry. GPTs can assist students in understanding and solving chemistry problems. However, there are potential negative impacts of using GPTs. This study aims to explore Indonesian university students’ perspectives on using GPTs for chemistry learning. The research used a case study method and collected data through questionnaires, interviews, and GPT usage logs, which were then analyzed thematically. The study revealed that students use GPTs in learning due to perceived usefulness, ease of use, emotional aspects, benefits, and social influence. Students appreciate GPT answers for being easy to understand, detailed, reliable, fairly accurate, fast, and helpful. However, students also recognize that GPT answers can be unreliable, difficult to understand, not always accurate, and potentially unethical. Students evaluate GPT responses by stimulating thoughts, confirming answers, integrating with other sources, directly copying responses, and paraphrasing before use. They are also aware of ethical considerations, drawbacks, and limitations associated with using GPTs. Findings pertaining to motives, constraints, and the evaluation of answer quality and its utilization can serve as indicators for the proper application of GPT in educational contexts. In many countries, including Indonesia, where there is a lack of usage regulations, concrete policies are necessary to ensure the proper integration of GPT into education.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"101 9","pages":"3666–3675 3666–3675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed chatbots into generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) capable of performing various tasks. The use of GPTs is expanding to learning, including natural sciences like chemistry. GPTs can assist students in understanding and solving chemistry problems. However, there are potential negative impacts of using GPTs. This study aims to explore Indonesian university students’ perspectives on using GPTs for chemistry learning. The research used a case study method and collected data through questionnaires, interviews, and GPT usage logs, which were then analyzed thematically. The study revealed that students use GPTs in learning due to perceived usefulness, ease of use, emotional aspects, benefits, and social influence. Students appreciate GPT answers for being easy to understand, detailed, reliable, fairly accurate, fast, and helpful. However, students also recognize that GPT answers can be unreliable, difficult to understand, not always accurate, and potentially unethical. Students evaluate GPT responses by stimulating thoughts, confirming answers, integrating with other sources, directly copying responses, and paraphrasing before use. They are also aware of ethical considerations, drawbacks, and limitations associated with using GPTs. Findings pertaining to motives, constraints, and the evaluation of answer quality and its utilization can serve as indicators for the proper application of GPT in educational contexts. In many countries, including Indonesia, where there is a lack of usage regulations, concrete policies are necessary to ensure the proper integration of GPT into education.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.