Synergies between price and life history enhance extinction risk in open-access fisheries

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES Fish and Fisheries Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1111/faf.12858
Leonardo Manir Feitosa, Matthew G. Burgess, Christopher M. Free, Steven D. Gaines
{"title":"Synergies between price and life history enhance extinction risk in open-access fisheries","authors":"Leonardo Manir Feitosa,&nbsp;Matthew G. Burgess,&nbsp;Christopher M. Free,&nbsp;Steven D. Gaines","doi":"10.1111/faf.12858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There have been few documented extinctions of fished species, but many bioeconomic models predict that open-access incentives make extinction possible. Open-access multi-species fisheries can cause species' extinction if other, faster-growing species maintain profits at fatal effort levels. Even target species can be profitably harvested to extinction if their prices rise sufficiently as they are depleted. Here, we explore interactions between these potential extinction mechanisms by modelling an open-access multi-species fishery with one or multiple fleets exploiting two species, each with different growth rates, ex-vessel prices, and price dynamics. Increases in the strong stock's (the stock with higher productivity relative to fishing susceptibility) price as it is depleted increase the range of conditions under which the weak stock can be driven extinct and shrinks the range of bioeconomic parameters in which both species can coexist under open-access. Catch hyperstability – whereby species become easier to catch as they are depleted – makes the weak stock weaker as it is depleted and further narrows the scope for coexistence. Fleet diversity in targeting ability can prevent weak stock extinction, as competition or switching balances species abundances. With few documented global fished-species extinctions, our results raise important questions, which we discuss. Is the apparent lack of extinctions largely due to management? Are more species in lightly-managed fisheries threatened with extinction than previously acknowledged? Have more extinctions than we realize already happened in data- and management-poor fisheries? Or have fishes' high fecundity and the oceans' vastness provided protection against extinction that is uncaptured by existing theoretical models?</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"25 6","pages":"972-984"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.12858","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12858","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There have been few documented extinctions of fished species, but many bioeconomic models predict that open-access incentives make extinction possible. Open-access multi-species fisheries can cause species' extinction if other, faster-growing species maintain profits at fatal effort levels. Even target species can be profitably harvested to extinction if their prices rise sufficiently as they are depleted. Here, we explore interactions between these potential extinction mechanisms by modelling an open-access multi-species fishery with one or multiple fleets exploiting two species, each with different growth rates, ex-vessel prices, and price dynamics. Increases in the strong stock's (the stock with higher productivity relative to fishing susceptibility) price as it is depleted increase the range of conditions under which the weak stock can be driven extinct and shrinks the range of bioeconomic parameters in which both species can coexist under open-access. Catch hyperstability – whereby species become easier to catch as they are depleted – makes the weak stock weaker as it is depleted and further narrows the scope for coexistence. Fleet diversity in targeting ability can prevent weak stock extinction, as competition or switching balances species abundances. With few documented global fished-species extinctions, our results raise important questions, which we discuss. Is the apparent lack of extinctions largely due to management? Are more species in lightly-managed fisheries threatened with extinction than previously acknowledged? Have more extinctions than we realize already happened in data- and management-poor fisheries? Or have fishes' high fecundity and the oceans' vastness provided protection against extinction that is uncaptured by existing theoretical models?

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
价格和生活史之间的协同作用增加了开放渔业中的灭绝风险
记录在案的渔业物种灭绝案例很少,但许多生物经济模型预测,开放式渔业激励机制使物种灭绝成为可能。如果其他增长较快的物种能在致命的努力量水平上维持利润,那么开放式多物种渔业就会导致物种灭绝。如果目标物种在枯竭时价格充分上涨,甚至目标物种也能被捕捞到灭绝而获利。在这里,我们通过模拟一个由一个或多个船队捕捞两个物种的开放式多物种渔业,探讨了这些潜在灭绝机制之间的相互作用,每个船队都有不同的增长率、出船价格和价格动态。强种群(相对于捕捞敏感性而言生产力较高的种群)的价格随着其枯竭而上升,增加了弱种群灭绝的条件范围,缩小了两个物种在开放条件下共存的生物经济参数范围。渔获量超稳定性--即物种随着枯竭而变得更容易捕获--使得弱种群随着枯竭而变得更弱,进一步缩小了共存的范围。渔船队在捕捞能力方面的多样性可以防止弱种群灭绝,因为竞争或转换可以平衡物种丰度。由于记录在案的全球渔业物种灭绝事件很少,我们的研究结果提出了一些重要问题,我们将对此进行讨论。表面上没有物种灭绝主要是因为管理的原因吗?在轻度管理的渔业中,濒临灭绝的物种是否比以前所认识到的更多?在缺乏数据和管理的渔业中,是否已经发生了比我们认识到的更多的物种灭绝?或者,鱼类的高繁殖力和海洋的广阔是否提供了现有理论模型无法捕捉到的防止灭绝的保护?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
期刊最新文献
Rebuilding and Reference Points Under Compensatory and Depensatory Recruitment: A Meta‐Analysis of Northeast Atlantic Fish Stocks A Global Synthesis of Environmental Enrichment Effect on Fish Stress Accounting for Salmon Body Size Declines in Fishery Management Can Reduce Conservation Risks Mesopelagic Fish Traits: Functions and Trade‐Offs Closing the Gaps in Fish Welfare: The Case for More Fundamental Work Into Physical Enrichment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1