Effects of a literary intervention on interaction quality in small-group discussions in the upper elementary grades

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101996
{"title":"Effects of a literary intervention on interaction quality in small-group discussions in the upper elementary grades","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Literary discussions represent a promising interaction context for the development of social, linguistic, and cognitive skills among children and adolescents. The one-year intervention of this study is based on a critical-analytic approach (Gasser et al., 2022; Murphy et al., 2009), focusing on the argumentative and inclusive quality of interactions in small group discussions about high-quality children's literature.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The goal is to study the effectiveness of this literary intervention on observed socio-emotional and instructional interaction quality in small group discussions about a moral dilemma text.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The sample included 51 teachers and 159 small groups from fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study is based on a cluster-randomized control group design with three measurement occasions, considering the multi-level structure of the data (L1: measurement occasions, L2: small groups, L3: teachers). Interaction quality in discussions was measured by the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Multilevel growth curve analyses show positive changes in both socio-emotional and instructional interaction quality in small group discussions in the intervention group, but not in the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results are discussed with reference to the potential of literary discussions for an integrated approach to promoting socio-emotional and academic learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001233/pdfft?md5=dabb94407685882c1700644f55c71045&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224001233-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Literary discussions represent a promising interaction context for the development of social, linguistic, and cognitive skills among children and adolescents. The one-year intervention of this study is based on a critical-analytic approach (Gasser et al., 2022; Murphy et al., 2009), focusing on the argumentative and inclusive quality of interactions in small group discussions about high-quality children's literature.

Aims

The goal is to study the effectiveness of this literary intervention on observed socio-emotional and instructional interaction quality in small group discussions about a moral dilemma text.

Sample

The sample included 51 teachers and 159 small groups from fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms.

Method

The study is based on a cluster-randomized control group design with three measurement occasions, considering the multi-level structure of the data (L1: measurement occasions, L2: small groups, L3: teachers). Interaction quality in discussions was measured by the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS).

Results

Multilevel growth curve analyses show positive changes in both socio-emotional and instructional interaction quality in small group discussions in the intervention group, but not in the control group.

Conclusions

The results are discussed with reference to the potential of literary discussions for an integrated approach to promoting socio-emotional and academic learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学干预对小学高年级小组讨论互动质量的影响
背景文学讨论是儿童和青少年发展社交、语言和认知能力的一个很有前景的互动环境。本研究采用批判分析法(Gasser 等人,2022 年;Murphy 等人,2009 年)进行为期一年的干预、样本样本包括来自四年级和五年级教室的 51 名教师和 159 个小组。方法研究基于分组随机对照组设计,有三个测量场合,考虑到数据的多层次结构(L1:测量场合,L2:小组,L3:教师)。结果多层次成长曲线分析表明,干预组在小组讨论中的社会情感和教学互动质量都发生了积极变化,而对照组则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Nine partner languages, one path: Minority language reading proficiency development among German two-way immersion students Effects of SI-PASS on a high-risk course – A randomized controlled trial Context counts: Unveiling the impact of achievement level on teachers’ text assessment How to teach Bayesian reasoning: An empirical study comparing four different probability training courses Understanding teacher judgments of student motivation: The role of (un-)available cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1