Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102048
Laura Boundy, Emily Croft, Kelly Burgoyne
{"title":"Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome","authors":"Laura Boundy,&nbsp;Emily Croft,&nbsp;Kelly Burgoyne","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Retrieving information during word learning significantly improves retention and recall in both typically developing children and those with language delays. However, the extent to which this strategy benefits all learners, particular those with cognitive impairment and significant learning difficulties is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study examined the effects of retrieval practice on novel word learning in children with Down syndrome.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>The sample consisted of 11 children with Down syndrome aged 8–13 years and 11 typically developing children with comparable receptive vocabulary skills aged 4–6 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were taught a series of novel words and their meanings either using retrieval or restudy strategies. Learning was assessed after 5-min and one week later. Mixed effects models were used to compare the effect of learning condition on recall and recognition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Recall accuracy of novel words was significantly higher in the retrieval condition compared to restudy in both participant groups, and this effect remained one week later. Children with Down syndrome also recalled significantly more meanings of these words in the retrieval condition compared to restudy; this effect was not significant for typically developing children.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Retrieval practice improves novel word learning in children with Down syndrome. These findings highlight retrieval practice as an effective learning strategy in diverse populations. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102048"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224001750","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Retrieving information during word learning significantly improves retention and recall in both typically developing children and those with language delays. However, the extent to which this strategy benefits all learners, particular those with cognitive impairment and significant learning difficulties is unclear.

Aims

This study examined the effects of retrieval practice on novel word learning in children with Down syndrome.

Sample

The sample consisted of 11 children with Down syndrome aged 8–13 years and 11 typically developing children with comparable receptive vocabulary skills aged 4–6 years.

Methods

Participants were taught a series of novel words and their meanings either using retrieval or restudy strategies. Learning was assessed after 5-min and one week later. Mixed effects models were used to compare the effect of learning condition on recall and recognition.

Results

Recall accuracy of novel words was significantly higher in the retrieval condition compared to restudy in both participant groups, and this effect remained one week later. Children with Down syndrome also recalled significantly more meanings of these words in the retrieval condition compared to restudy; this effect was not significant for typically developing children.

Conclusions

Retrieval practice improves novel word learning in children with Down syndrome. These findings highlight retrieval practice as an effective learning strategy in diverse populations. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检索支持唐氏综合症儿童的单词学习
背景在单词学习过程中检索信息可显著提高发育正常儿童和语言发育迟缓儿童的单词保持率和记忆率。本研究探讨了检索练习对唐氏综合症儿童新词学习的影响。样本样本由 11 名年龄在 8-13 岁的唐氏综合症儿童和 11 名年龄在 4-6 岁、接受词汇能力相当的发育正常儿童组成。学习效果在 5 分钟后和一周后进行评估。结果两组受试者在检索条件下对新单词的记忆准确率都明显高于复习条件下的记忆准确率,而且这种影响在一周后仍然存在。唐氏综合症儿童在检索条件下回忆起的这些单词的含义也明显多于复习条件下回忆起的这些单词的含义;而这一效果在典型发育儿童中并不明显。这些发现凸显了检索练习是针对不同人群的有效学习策略。本文还讨论了理论和实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1