Exploring micromobility choice behavior across different mode users using machine learning methods

{"title":"Exploring micromobility choice behavior across different mode users using machine learning methods","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2024.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In an effort to capture travelers’ propensity towards micro-mobility options, a consumer survey was designed and conducted in the state of Florida in Fall 2021. In addition to collecting socioeconomic, demographic, attitudinal, and trip-related information, stated-preference scenarios were presented to the respondents, in which they were asked to choose between their current mode, and three different micro-mobility alternatives, namely: e-scooter, e-scooter + public transit, and moped. A machine learning classification model, the tree-based Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was applied to study users’ mode choice toward micromobility options given its non-parametric nature and high predictive power. SHAP values were then used to analyze the contributing factors for each of the micro-mobility options. In addition, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) was employed to interpret and validate the SHAP findings at the individual prediction level. Model results show that age, car-oriented attitudes, lack of familiarity/previous experience, and lack of appropriate infrastructures were the major barriers to choose micro-mobility services. Such services can be suitable alternatives for young people who come from large families or ride-share users who have prior experience with micromobility services. Among different micro-mobility alternatives, mopeds were favored by males and green travelers. It seems that e-scooter + public transit was considered a safe and comfortable option, especially for students and low-income individuals, but generally not favored by travel time-sensitive or green travelers. Finally, e-scooters seem to be a favorable option for younger individuals with short travel distances. Our findings provide additional insights on policies that may help encourage the use of micromobility devices and promote sustainable, affordable, and equitable mobility services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000480/pdfft?md5=627854bf007e54aa81f10ca0ead8441d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772586324000480-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an effort to capture travelers’ propensity towards micro-mobility options, a consumer survey was designed and conducted in the state of Florida in Fall 2021. In addition to collecting socioeconomic, demographic, attitudinal, and trip-related information, stated-preference scenarios were presented to the respondents, in which they were asked to choose between their current mode, and three different micro-mobility alternatives, namely: e-scooter, e-scooter + public transit, and moped. A machine learning classification model, the tree-based Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was applied to study users’ mode choice toward micromobility options given its non-parametric nature and high predictive power. SHAP values were then used to analyze the contributing factors for each of the micro-mobility options. In addition, Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) was employed to interpret and validate the SHAP findings at the individual prediction level. Model results show that age, car-oriented attitudes, lack of familiarity/previous experience, and lack of appropriate infrastructures were the major barriers to choose micro-mobility services. Such services can be suitable alternatives for young people who come from large families or ride-share users who have prior experience with micromobility services. Among different micro-mobility alternatives, mopeds were favored by males and green travelers. It seems that e-scooter + public transit was considered a safe and comfortable option, especially for students and low-income individuals, but generally not favored by travel time-sensitive or green travelers. Finally, e-scooters seem to be a favorable option for younger individuals with short travel distances. Our findings provide additional insights on policies that may help encourage the use of micromobility devices and promote sustainable, affordable, and equitable mobility services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习方法探索不同模式用户的微型交通选择行为
为了了解旅行者对微型交通选择的倾向,我们设计了一项消费者调查,并于 2021 年秋季在佛罗里达州进行了调查。除了收集社会经济、人口、态度和出行相关信息外,还向受访者展示了陈述偏好情景,要求他们在当前模式和三种不同的微型交通替代方案(即电动摩托车、电动摩托车+公共交通和轻便摩托车)之间做出选择。鉴于其非参数性质和较高的预测能力,我们采用了一种机器学习分类模型,即基于树的极梯度提升算法,来研究用户对微型交通选择的模式选择。然后,利用 SHAP 值分析了每种微型交通方式的促成因素。此外,还采用了 "本地可解释模型-不可知解释(LIME)"来解释和验证个体预测层面的 SHAP 结果。模型结果表明,年龄、以车为导向的态度、缺乏熟悉/以往经验以及缺乏适当的基础设施是选择微型交通服务的主要障碍。对于来自大家庭的年轻人或有过使用微型交通服务经验的共享乘车用户来说,这类服务可能是合适的替代选择。在不同的微型交通工具中,轻便摩托车受到男性和绿色旅行者的青睐。电动滑板车+公共交通似乎被认为是一种安全舒适的选择,尤其是对于学生和低收入人群来说,但一般不被对出行时间敏感或绿色出行的人所青睐。最后,对于出行距离较短的年轻人来说,电动滑板车似乎是一个有利的选择。我们的研究结果为政策提供了更多启示,这些政策可能有助于鼓励使用微型交通设备,促进可持续、可负担和公平的交通服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement learning in transportation research: Frontiers and future directions Enhancement of the impacts 2050 model to enable a whole system sustainability assessment of rideshare Co-creating multimodal transportation hubs in Switzerland: How to close the gap between actors across different scales, levels, and sectors Exploring micromobility choice behavior across different mode users using machine learning methods Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1