Moving beyond binary language status in research: Investigating early foreign language learning and linguistic distance

Nils Jaekel , Michael Schurig , Eliane Lorenz
{"title":"Moving beyond binary language status in research: Investigating early foreign language learning and linguistic distance","authors":"Nils Jaekel ,&nbsp;Michael Schurig ,&nbsp;Eliane Lorenz","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Globalization and migration continue to shape our societies, including educational contexts such as school classrooms. In response to young learners’ linguistic needs, particularly in the context of foreign language learning in Germany, educational approaches need to be adapted to meet the needs of multilingual students. Current, binary approaches accounting for diverse linguistic backgrounds of students in research assume a high degree of homogeneity among multilingual students. Linguistic distance measures may provide alternative, more fine-grained, continuous tools to account for linguistic diversity. This study employs lexical linguistic distance to account for young language learners’ linguistic diversity in a reanalysis of Jaekel et al. (2017). Additionally, mixed-effects modeling was employed to factor in within-class effects for within-class factors versus structural equation modeling, which was previously used. The results outline that linguistic distance provides additional information beyond binary language status. Mixed effects modeling renders comparable results with the same tendencies, but yields more nuanced perspectives on the data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000570/pdfft?md5=9492363d23de861a48c0f3725af5df5f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772766124000570-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globalization and migration continue to shape our societies, including educational contexts such as school classrooms. In response to young learners’ linguistic needs, particularly in the context of foreign language learning in Germany, educational approaches need to be adapted to meet the needs of multilingual students. Current, binary approaches accounting for diverse linguistic backgrounds of students in research assume a high degree of homogeneity among multilingual students. Linguistic distance measures may provide alternative, more fine-grained, continuous tools to account for linguistic diversity. This study employs lexical linguistic distance to account for young language learners’ linguistic diversity in a reanalysis of Jaekel et al. (2017). Additionally, mixed-effects modeling was employed to factor in within-class effects for within-class factors versus structural equation modeling, which was previously used. The results outline that linguistic distance provides additional information beyond binary language status. Mixed effects modeling renders comparable results with the same tendencies, but yields more nuanced perspectives on the data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在研究中超越二元语言地位:调查早期外语学习和语言距离
全球化和移民继续影响着我们的社会,包括学校课堂等教育环境。为了满足年轻学习者的语言需求,特别是在德国的外语学习环境中,需要调整教育方法,以满足多语种学生的需求。目前,在研究中考虑学生不同语言背景的二元方法假定了多语言学生之间的高度同质性。语言距离测量法可以提供替代性的、更精细的、连续的工具,来说明语言的多样性。本研究在对 Jaekel 等人(2017)的研究进行重新分析时,采用了词汇语言距离来解释年轻语言学习者的语言多样性。此外,与之前使用的结构方程模型相比,本研究采用了混合效应模型来考虑班内因素的班内效应。结果表明,语言距离提供了二元语言状态之外的额外信息。混合效应模型得出了具有相同倾向的可比结果,但对数据产生了更细微的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Toward ethical praxis in longitudinal research with children: Reflecting on ethical tensions in participatory research A conversation analysis-complex dynamics systems theory (CA-CDST) approach for analyzing longitudinal development in L2 pragmatics Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research Data from role plays and elicited conversations: What do they show about L2 interactional competence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1