C-frame thinking: Embedding behavioral economics into ecological economics

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108373
Leonardo Boncinelli , Luzie Dallinger , Tiziano Distefano
{"title":"C-frame thinking: Embedding behavioral economics into ecological economics","authors":"Leonardo Boncinelli ,&nbsp;Luzie Dallinger ,&nbsp;Tiziano Distefano","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to explore opportunities for integrating Behavioral Economics (BE) into Ecological Economics (EE). By examining the frames of analysis for both disciplines, this study categorizes BE as operating at the individual level (<em>i-frame</em>), while EE addresses systemic aspects of society (<em>s-frame</em>) and extends its considerations to the biosphere (<em>n-frame</em>), advocating for collective action through bottom-up intermediate-level interventions (<em>c-frame</em>).</p><p>The study posits that EE can benefit from BE’s rich insights into human behavior and decision-making, especially for <em>c-frame</em> action strategies. However, integrating these disciplines requires finding common ontological and epistemological ground to avoid eclecticism and methodological flaws. The integration is approached in two steps: first, adapting BE epistemology to the systems thinking approach of EE, and second, addressing the ontological gap in BE regarding the world surrounding the individual. This paper argues that embedding BE within EE’s ontology points to the necessity of <em>c-frame</em> thinking for human decision-making.</p><p>A case study of the ex-GKN factory in Italy demonstrates the practical benefits of <em>c-frame</em> thinking in a complex decision process. An alliance of workers, researchers, and civil society movements collaboratively developed a future plan that considered the needs of all stakeholders, showcasing the effectiveness of collective action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 108373"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002702/pdfft?md5=1fb1a2c1ae1c84507579de309adcdef0&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924002702-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to explore opportunities for integrating Behavioral Economics (BE) into Ecological Economics (EE). By examining the frames of analysis for both disciplines, this study categorizes BE as operating at the individual level (i-frame), while EE addresses systemic aspects of society (s-frame) and extends its considerations to the biosphere (n-frame), advocating for collective action through bottom-up intermediate-level interventions (c-frame).

The study posits that EE can benefit from BE’s rich insights into human behavior and decision-making, especially for c-frame action strategies. However, integrating these disciplines requires finding common ontological and epistemological ground to avoid eclecticism and methodological flaws. The integration is approached in two steps: first, adapting BE epistemology to the systems thinking approach of EE, and second, addressing the ontological gap in BE regarding the world surrounding the individual. This paper argues that embedding BE within EE’s ontology points to the necessity of c-frame thinking for human decision-making.

A case study of the ex-GKN factory in Italy demonstrates the practical benefits of c-frame thinking in a complex decision process. An alliance of workers, researchers, and civil society movements collaboratively developed a future plan that considered the needs of all stakeholders, showcasing the effectiveness of collective action.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
C 框思维:将行为经济学纳入生态经济学
本文旨在探讨将行为经济学(BE)融入生态经济学(EE)的机会。通过研究这两门学科的分析框架,本研究将行为经济学归类为在个人层面(i-框架)运作的学科,而生态经济学则涉及社会的系统方面(s-框架),并将其考虑扩展到生物圈(n-框架),主张通过自下而上的中间层干预(c-框架)采取集体行动。本研究认为,生态经济学可以从行为经济学对人类行为和决策的丰富见解中获益,尤其是在c-框架的行动策略方面。然而,整合这些学科需要找到共同的本体论和认识论基础,以避免折衷主义和方法论缺陷。整合分两步进行:首先,使环境教育的系统思维方法适应环境教育的认识论;其次,解决环境教育中关于个体周围世界的本体论差距。本文认为,将环境教育本体论中的环境教育嵌入到人类决策中,表明了c-frame思维的必要性。对意大利前吉凯恩(GKN)工厂的案例研究表明了c-frame思维在复杂决策过程中的实际好处。由工人、研究人员和民间社会运动组成的联盟共同制定了一项考虑到所有利益相关者需求的未来计划,展示了集体行动的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Environmental responsibility and exposure of finance: Combining environmentally-extended input-output and balance sheet approaches Global land-use implications of preference shifts towards regional feed and sustainable diets in Germany and the European Union Effect simulation and local adaptation of multi-agent collaborative governance in marine eco-economic systems: Evidence from China Carbon Giants: Exploring the Top 100 Industrial CO2 Emitters in the EU Public support for degrowth policies and sufficiency behaviours in the United States: A discrete choice experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1