Single incision mini sling for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: Surgical outcomes and preoperative predictors of failure

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2024.03.020
Tsia-Shu Lo , Fazlin Harun , Sandy Chua , Lan-Sin Jhang , Wu-Chiao Hsieh , Yi-Hao Lin
{"title":"Single incision mini sling for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: Surgical outcomes and preoperative predictors of failure","authors":"Tsia-Shu Lo ,&nbsp;Fazlin Harun ,&nbsp;Sandy Chua ,&nbsp;Lan-Sin Jhang ,&nbsp;Wu-Chiao Hsieh ,&nbsp;Yi-Hao Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.tjog.2024.03.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the surgical outcomes and predictors of failure of Single Incision Mini Sling (Ophira) in women with urodynamic stress incontinence.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Records of 115 women underwent anti-incontinence procedure using Ophira Mini Sling from June 2019 to September 2020 reviewed. Subjective evaluation was assessed using validated IIQ-7, UDI-6, POPDI-6 and PISQ-12 questionnaires. Multichannel urodynamics, 1-h pad test and 72-h voiding diary was performed as objective evaluation. Primary outcome was the objective cure rate of negative urine leak on provocative filling cystometry and 1-h pad test weight &lt;2 g, and subjective cure rate was negative response to question 3 of UDI-6. Secondary outcome was to identify risk factors associated with failure for Ophira.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total of 108 women were evaluated. The objective cure rate was 91.7% with subjective cure rate of 86.1%. Comparison of clinical outcome shows significant improvement of USI post-operatively (p &lt; 0.001) and reflected in 1-h pad test (p &lt; 0.001). Improvement in all subjective evaluation parameters is seen except for POPDI-6. Failure of Ophira correlate significantly in women age &gt;66 years, presence of asthma, pre-operative Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency (ISD), and Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure (MUCP) value &lt; 40 cmH20.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ophira Single Incision Mini Sling is safe and effective treatment option for USI, showing high objective and subjective cure rates with low incidence of complications. Non-modifiable risks of age ≥66 years, asthma status, pre-operative intrinsic sphincteric deficiency and low maximal urethral closure pressure were the factors of failure for Ophira.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49449,"journal":{"name":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"63 5","pages":"Pages 685-691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001773/pdfft?md5=7671175e207a8b46a40b0a7ccb1c2600&pid=1-s2.0-S1028455924001773-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the surgical outcomes and predictors of failure of Single Incision Mini Sling (Ophira) in women with urodynamic stress incontinence.

Materials and methods

Records of 115 women underwent anti-incontinence procedure using Ophira Mini Sling from June 2019 to September 2020 reviewed. Subjective evaluation was assessed using validated IIQ-7, UDI-6, POPDI-6 and PISQ-12 questionnaires. Multichannel urodynamics, 1-h pad test and 72-h voiding diary was performed as objective evaluation. Primary outcome was the objective cure rate of negative urine leak on provocative filling cystometry and 1-h pad test weight <2 g, and subjective cure rate was negative response to question 3 of UDI-6. Secondary outcome was to identify risk factors associated with failure for Ophira.

Results

Total of 108 women were evaluated. The objective cure rate was 91.7% with subjective cure rate of 86.1%. Comparison of clinical outcome shows significant improvement of USI post-operatively (p < 0.001) and reflected in 1-h pad test (p < 0.001). Improvement in all subjective evaluation parameters is seen except for POPDI-6. Failure of Ophira correlate significantly in women age >66 years, presence of asthma, pre-operative Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency (ISD), and Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure (MUCP) value < 40 cmH20.

Conclusion

Ophira Single Incision Mini Sling is safe and effective treatment option for USI, showing high objective and subjective cure rates with low incidence of complications. Non-modifiable risks of age ≥66 years, asthma status, pre-operative intrinsic sphincteric deficiency and low maximal urethral closure pressure were the factors of failure for Ophira.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗尿动力性压力性尿失禁的单切口微型吊带:手术效果和术前失败预测因素
目的 评价单切口迷你吊衣(Ophira)在尿动力性压力性尿失禁女性中的手术效果和失败预测因素。材料和方法 回顾性分析 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 9 月期间使用 Ophira 迷你吊衣进行抗尿失禁手术的 115 名女性的记录。使用有效的 IIQ-7、UDI-6、POPDI-6 和 PISQ-12 问卷进行主观评估。多通道尿动力学、1 小时尿垫测试和 72 小时排尿日记作为客观评估。主观治愈率为对 UDI-6 问题 3 的回答为阴性。次要结果是确定与 Ophira 治疗失败相关的风险因素。客观治愈率为 91.7%,主观治愈率为 86.1%。临床结果比较显示,术后 USI 显著改善(p < 0.001),并反映在 1 小时垫测试中(p < 0.001)。除 POPDI-6 外,所有主观评估参数均有改善。结论Ophira单切口迷你吊带是治疗尿道外翻的安全有效的选择,客观和主观治愈率高,并发症发生率低。年龄≥66岁、哮喘状态、术前本能括约肌缺陷和最大尿道闭合压过低等不可改变的风险是导致Ophira失败的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
23.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is a peer-reviewed journal and open access publishing editorials, reviews, original articles, short communications, case reports, research letters, correspondence and letters to the editor in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The aims of the journal are to: 1.Publish cutting-edge, innovative and topical research that addresses screening, diagnosis, management and care in women''s health 2.Deliver evidence-based information 3.Promote the sharing of clinical experience 4.Address women-related health promotion The journal provides comprehensive coverage of topics in obstetrics & gynecology and women''s health including maternal-fetal medicine, reproductive endocrinology/infertility, and gynecologic oncology. Taiwan Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Instructions to Authors Evaluation of atherogenic indices in patients with endometrioma: A case-control study Progesterone receptor isoform B in the stroma of squamous cervical carcinoma: An independent favorable prognostic marker correlating with hematogenous metastasis Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: The better choice?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1