Unraveling fetal venous disorders: An integrated approach in fetal echocardiography and their clinical significance

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2024.03.021
Wei-Hsiang Tseng , Hsi-Chu Lai , Li-Ling Lin , Shen-Ling Jan , Hsien-Wen Peng , Jenn-Jhy Tseng
{"title":"Unraveling fetal venous disorders: An integrated approach in fetal echocardiography and their clinical significance","authors":"Wei-Hsiang Tseng ,&nbsp;Hsi-Chu Lai ,&nbsp;Li-Ling Lin ,&nbsp;Shen-Ling Jan ,&nbsp;Hsien-Wen Peng ,&nbsp;Jenn-Jhy Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.tjog.2024.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Fetal venous system malformations frequently coincide with cardiac or extracardiac anomalies. This study explores our experience with an integrated fetal echocardiography approach and analyzes the characteristics and outcomes of fetal venous system disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study with 7048 pregnant women (7255 fetuses) who underwent complete two-dimensional (2D) fetal echocardiographic examinations. We primarily employed an integrated 2D approach. Three-/four-dimensional (3D/4D) spatiotemporal image correlation was supplemental. Fetal venous disorders were classified into 3 groups: cardinal (Group 1), umbilical and vitelline (Group 2), and pulmonary (Group 3) systems, based on embryological-anatomical considerations. Maternofetal data were recorded alongside imaging diagnoses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Congenital venous malformations were identified in 98 fetuses, yielding a prevalence of 1.35% (98/7255). Six participants had coexisting venous disorders from different groups. Group 1 included 48 fetuses with persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC) and 3 others (unidentified brachiocephalic vein, left inferior vena cava (IVC), and interrupted IVC with azygous continuation to SVC). Group 2 had 39 fetuses with persistent right umbilical vein and 7 with umbilical-portal-ductus venosus disorders. Group 3 had 7 fetuses with pulmonary venous return disorders. Group 2 showed the most favorable outcomes (alive and without neonatal death), while Group 3 exhibited the poorest. Associated cardiac defects were observed in 43.1% of Group 1, 8.7% of Group 2, and 57.1% of Group 3 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), displaying a broad spectrum of non-specific anomalies. Meanwhile, Group 2 had a greater occurrence of a single venous disorder (93.5%) compared to Group 1 (88.2%) and Group 3 (57.1%) (<em>P</em> = 0.020).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our approach offers an integrated strategy for assessing the fetal venous system during fetal echocardiography, providing multiple views to characterize venous anomalies. The presence of a fetal venous disorder may indicate the coexistence of more severe abnormalities, and the prognosis depends on associated anomalies or the venous disorders per se.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49449,"journal":{"name":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"63 5","pages":"Pages 700-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001797/pdfft?md5=e993dc1aa30886ca80a0a4f26dac0777&pid=1-s2.0-S1028455924001797-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455924001797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Fetal venous system malformations frequently coincide with cardiac or extracardiac anomalies. This study explores our experience with an integrated fetal echocardiography approach and analyzes the characteristics and outcomes of fetal venous system disorders.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective study with 7048 pregnant women (7255 fetuses) who underwent complete two-dimensional (2D) fetal echocardiographic examinations. We primarily employed an integrated 2D approach. Three-/four-dimensional (3D/4D) spatiotemporal image correlation was supplemental. Fetal venous disorders were classified into 3 groups: cardinal (Group 1), umbilical and vitelline (Group 2), and pulmonary (Group 3) systems, based on embryological-anatomical considerations. Maternofetal data were recorded alongside imaging diagnoses.

Results

Congenital venous malformations were identified in 98 fetuses, yielding a prevalence of 1.35% (98/7255). Six participants had coexisting venous disorders from different groups. Group 1 included 48 fetuses with persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC) and 3 others (unidentified brachiocephalic vein, left inferior vena cava (IVC), and interrupted IVC with azygous continuation to SVC). Group 2 had 39 fetuses with persistent right umbilical vein and 7 with umbilical-portal-ductus venosus disorders. Group 3 had 7 fetuses with pulmonary venous return disorders. Group 2 showed the most favorable outcomes (alive and without neonatal death), while Group 3 exhibited the poorest. Associated cardiac defects were observed in 43.1% of Group 1, 8.7% of Group 2, and 57.1% of Group 3 (P < 0.001), displaying a broad spectrum of non-specific anomalies. Meanwhile, Group 2 had a greater occurrence of a single venous disorder (93.5%) compared to Group 1 (88.2%) and Group 3 (57.1%) (P = 0.020).

Conclusion

Our approach offers an integrated strategy for assessing the fetal venous system during fetal echocardiography, providing multiple views to characterize venous anomalies. The presence of a fetal venous disorder may indicate the coexistence of more severe abnormalities, and the prognosis depends on associated anomalies or the venous disorders per se.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读胎儿静脉疾病:胎儿超声心动图的综合方法及其临床意义
目的胎儿静脉系统畸形经常与心脏或心脏外畸形同时发生。本研究探讨了我们采用综合胎儿超声心动图方法的经验,并分析了胎儿静脉系统畸形的特点和结局。材料与方法 我们对 7048 名孕妇(7255 个胎儿)进行了回顾性研究,她们均接受了完整的二维(2D)胎儿超声心动图检查。我们主要采用综合二维方法。三维/四维(3D/4D)时空图像相关性作为补充。根据胚胎解剖学的考虑,胎儿静脉疾病被分为三组:贲门系统(第 1 组)、脐静脉和玻璃体系统(第 2 组)以及肺动脉系统(第 3 组)。结果在 98 个胎儿中发现了先天性静脉畸形,发病率为 1.35%(98/7255)。六名参与者同时患有不同组别的静脉疾病。第一组包括 48 个患有持续性左上腔静脉(LSVC)的胎儿和其他 3 个胎儿(不明肱静脉、左下腔静脉(IVC)和中断的 IVC,但有连接至 SVC 的zygous)。第 2 组有 39 个胎儿患有持续性右脐静脉疾病,7 个胎儿患有脐-门-导静脉疾病。第 3 组有 7 个胎儿患有肺静脉回流障碍。第 2 组胎儿的预后最好(存活且无新生儿死亡),而第 3 组胎儿的预后最差。第 1 组中有 43.1%、第 2 组中有 8.7%、第 3 组中有 57.1%(P< 0.001)的胎儿伴有心脏缺陷,显示出广泛的非特异性异常。同时,与第一组(88.2%)和第三组(57.1%)相比,第二组出现单一静脉疾病的比例更高(93.5%)(P = 0.020)。胎儿静脉畸形可能预示着同时存在更严重的畸形,而预后则取决于相关畸形或静脉畸形本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
23.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is a peer-reviewed journal and open access publishing editorials, reviews, original articles, short communications, case reports, research letters, correspondence and letters to the editor in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The aims of the journal are to: 1.Publish cutting-edge, innovative and topical research that addresses screening, diagnosis, management and care in women''s health 2.Deliver evidence-based information 3.Promote the sharing of clinical experience 4.Address women-related health promotion The journal provides comprehensive coverage of topics in obstetrics & gynecology and women''s health including maternal-fetal medicine, reproductive endocrinology/infertility, and gynecologic oncology. Taiwan Association of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Instructions to Authors Evaluation of atherogenic indices in patients with endometrioma: A case-control study Progesterone receptor isoform B in the stroma of squamous cervical carcinoma: An independent favorable prognostic marker correlating with hematogenous metastasis Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: The better choice?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1