Stable pollinator communities in different white clover populations suggest potential win-win scenarios for crop yield and biodiversity

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109295
{"title":"Stable pollinator communities in different white clover populations suggest potential win-win scenarios for crop yield and biodiversity","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compared to monocultures, intercropping systems offer many agronomic benefits, including higher yield stability. In this study, we assessed whether cropping systems that are beneficial for yield stability are also beneficial for pollinator communities and whether the effect is modulated by the landscape type. Using a replicated block design in one heterogeneous and one homogeneous agricultural landscape, we studied the pollinator communities in eight populations (i.e., genotypes) of white clover (<em>Trifolium repens</em>) grown as a monoculture or as a two-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass, <em>Lolium perenne</em>) or three-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass and chicory, <em>Cichorium intybus</em>). We recorded 1486 honey bees and 1254 wild pollinators belonging to 46 species. Bumble bees were the most abundant wild pollinators (49.6 %), followed by hover flies (23.4 %), and non-<em>Bombus</em> wild bees (21.5 %). Lepidoptera accounted for only 5.4 % of the wild pollinators. We found a higher species richness and abundance of wild pollinators in monocultures than in two-species mixtures, but white clover population did not influence pollinators. Moreover, species richness and abundance were also higher in the homogeneous landscape than in the heterogenous one. Most species were foraging on white clover. However, 18 species (39.1 %, n = 18/46) were recorded foraging on chicory and/or weeds, and ten of these wild pollinator species were never recorded on white clover. Our study highlights that diverse pollinator communities require both abundant floral resources and diverse plant communities, that their needs are not in conflict with the goal of achieving yield stability, and that the landscape type can modulate the effect of the cropping system. Moreover, the lack of pollinator preference for different white clover populations suggests that farmers can select mixtures that enhance yield stability without negatively affecting pollinator communities. Overall, these results highlight that intercropping systems comprising several plant species and plant genotypes can guarantee yield stability without compromising the pollinator community, showing that win-win situations for farmers and biodiversity are possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004134/pdfft?md5=e3fc3e446ced64a12111ed2dd12931b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167880924004134-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared to monocultures, intercropping systems offer many agronomic benefits, including higher yield stability. In this study, we assessed whether cropping systems that are beneficial for yield stability are also beneficial for pollinator communities and whether the effect is modulated by the landscape type. Using a replicated block design in one heterogeneous and one homogeneous agricultural landscape, we studied the pollinator communities in eight populations (i.e., genotypes) of white clover (Trifolium repens) grown as a monoculture or as a two-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne) or three-species mixture (together with perennial ryegrass and chicory, Cichorium intybus). We recorded 1486 honey bees and 1254 wild pollinators belonging to 46 species. Bumble bees were the most abundant wild pollinators (49.6 %), followed by hover flies (23.4 %), and non-Bombus wild bees (21.5 %). Lepidoptera accounted for only 5.4 % of the wild pollinators. We found a higher species richness and abundance of wild pollinators in monocultures than in two-species mixtures, but white clover population did not influence pollinators. Moreover, species richness and abundance were also higher in the homogeneous landscape than in the heterogenous one. Most species were foraging on white clover. However, 18 species (39.1 %, n = 18/46) were recorded foraging on chicory and/or weeds, and ten of these wild pollinator species were never recorded on white clover. Our study highlights that diverse pollinator communities require both abundant floral resources and diverse plant communities, that their needs are not in conflict with the goal of achieving yield stability, and that the landscape type can modulate the effect of the cropping system. Moreover, the lack of pollinator preference for different white clover populations suggests that farmers can select mixtures that enhance yield stability without negatively affecting pollinator communities. Overall, these results highlight that intercropping systems comprising several plant species and plant genotypes can guarantee yield stability without compromising the pollinator community, showing that win-win situations for farmers and biodiversity are possible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同白三叶草种群中稳定的授粉者群落为作物产量和生物多样性提供了潜在的双赢方案
与单一种植相比,间作系统具有许多农艺优势,包括更高的产量稳定性。在这项研究中,我们评估了有利于产量稳定的种植系统是否也有利于传粉昆虫群落,以及这种影响是否受景观类型的调节。我们在一个异质和一个均质农业景观中采用重复区组设计,研究了以单一种植或双品种混种(与多年生黑麦草一起种植)或三品种混种(与多年生黑麦草和菊苣一起种植)方式种植的白三叶(Trifolium repens)的八个种群(即基因型)中的传粉昆虫群落。我们共记录到 1486 只蜜蜂和 1254 种野生授粉昆虫,分属 46 个物种。大黄蜂是数量最多的野生传粉昆虫(49.6%),其次是食蚜蝇(23.4%)和非大黄蜂野生昆虫(21.5%)。鳞翅目仅占野生传粉昆虫的 5.4%。我们发现,与双种混交植物相比,单种混交植物中野生传粉昆虫的物种丰富度和丰度更高,但白三叶草的数量并不影响传粉昆虫。此外,同质景观中的物种丰富度和丰度也高于异质景观。大多数物种都在白三叶草上觅食。然而,有 18 个物种(39.1%,n = 18/46)在菊苣和/或杂草上觅食,其中有 10 个野生传粉昆虫从未在白三叶上记录到过。我们的研究强调,多样化的传粉昆虫群落需要丰富的花卉资源和多样化的植物群落,它们的需求与实现产量稳定的目标并不冲突,而且景观类型可以调节种植系统的效果。此外,授粉昆虫对不同的白三叶种群缺乏偏好,这表明农民可以选择既能提高产量稳定性,又不会对授粉昆虫群落产生负面影响的混合物。总之,这些结果突出表明,由多种植物物种和植物基因型组成的间作系统可以在不损害传粉昆虫群落的情况下保证产量的稳定性,表明农民和生物多样性双赢的局面是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Global effects of livestock grazing on ecosystem functions vary with grazing management and environment Disentangling the effects of applying pig slurry or its digestate to winter wheat or a catch crop on dissolved C fluxes Soil labile organic carbon and nitrate nitrogen are the main factors driving carbon-fixing pathways during vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau, China Stable pollinator communities in different white clover populations suggest potential win-win scenarios for crop yield and biodiversity Crop rotation and green manure type enhance organic carbon fractions and reduce soil arsenic content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1