{"title":"Assessment of the impact of accurate green area index, water regime and harvest index on site-specific wheat yield estimation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2024.109429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent decades, extensive research has focused on estimating winter wheat yields and developing methods for collecting the necessary field data. However, it may be advantageous to first evaluate which data types and levels of model complexity are truly essential. This study examined the explanatory power of water regime modeling, the green area index (GAI), site-specific soil texture, and harvest index (HI) data in estimating winter wheat yields throughout the growing season. Data collected over 13 years from measurements of GAI and soil moisture in winter wheat plot trials in northern Germany were integrated into a plant growth and soil water budget model (HUME). The soil moisture data were used to estimate site-specific soil textures. Monitoring GAI was identified as the key factor for explaining yield. The increased modeling effort of integrating GAI into HUME was found to be justified. The modelled transpiration provided a more accurate explanation of the yield at the end of the season (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86) compared to radiation uptake (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73). Additionally, predictors based on transpiration were less dependent on GAI senescence and HI data. By the time of the third N fertilization, the most effective predictor tested − transpiration standardized daily by the saturation deficit of the air – allowed for the prediction of a substantial portion of site- and year-specific grain yield variation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.64). This suggests that it could serve as a valuable starting point for developing N management strategies. Site-specific soil textures only marginally improved yield estimation, with an increase in R<sup>2</sup> of less than 0.05. The findings indicate that interpreting GAI through soil water modeling can uncover water limitations that affect winter wheat yield, even in temperate climates. This underscored the importance of ongoing research to generate comprehensive, site-specific GAI data throughout the growing season. Alongside the results and methodological approach discussed here, such data could potentially enable nitrogen fertilization management driven by yield predictions in the future, thereby improving N efficiency in wheat cultivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924008202/pdfft?md5=522f2ef005f95e87644b29ee8e5cd64f&pid=1-s2.0-S0168169924008202-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169924008202","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent decades, extensive research has focused on estimating winter wheat yields and developing methods for collecting the necessary field data. However, it may be advantageous to first evaluate which data types and levels of model complexity are truly essential. This study examined the explanatory power of water regime modeling, the green area index (GAI), site-specific soil texture, and harvest index (HI) data in estimating winter wheat yields throughout the growing season. Data collected over 13 years from measurements of GAI and soil moisture in winter wheat plot trials in northern Germany were integrated into a plant growth and soil water budget model (HUME). The soil moisture data were used to estimate site-specific soil textures. Monitoring GAI was identified as the key factor for explaining yield. The increased modeling effort of integrating GAI into HUME was found to be justified. The modelled transpiration provided a more accurate explanation of the yield at the end of the season (R2 = 0.86) compared to radiation uptake (R2 = 0.73). Additionally, predictors based on transpiration were less dependent on GAI senescence and HI data. By the time of the third N fertilization, the most effective predictor tested − transpiration standardized daily by the saturation deficit of the air – allowed for the prediction of a substantial portion of site- and year-specific grain yield variation (R2 = 0.64). This suggests that it could serve as a valuable starting point for developing N management strategies. Site-specific soil textures only marginally improved yield estimation, with an increase in R2 of less than 0.05. The findings indicate that interpreting GAI through soil water modeling can uncover water limitations that affect winter wheat yield, even in temperate climates. This underscored the importance of ongoing research to generate comprehensive, site-specific GAI data throughout the growing season. Alongside the results and methodological approach discussed here, such data could potentially enable nitrogen fertilization management driven by yield predictions in the future, thereby improving N efficiency in wheat cultivation.
近几十年来,大量研究都集中在估算冬小麦产量和开发收集必要田间数据的方法上。然而,首先评估哪些数据类型和模型复杂程度是真正必要的,可能会有好处。本研究考察了水系模型、绿地指数(GAI)、特定地点土壤质地和收获指数(HI)数据在估算冬小麦整个生长季节产量方面的解释力。通过测量德国北部冬小麦小区试验的 GAI 和土壤水分,将 13 年来所收集的数据整合到植物生长和土壤水分预算模型 (HUME) 中。土壤水分数据用于估算特定地点的土壤质地。监测 GAI 被认为是解释产量的关键因素。将 GAI 纳入 HUME 所增加的建模工作量是合理的。与辐射吸收量(R2 = 0.73)相比,模拟蒸腾量能更准确地解释季末产量(R2 = 0.86)。此外,基于蒸腾作用的预测结果对 GAI 衰老和 HI 数据的依赖性较低。到第三次氮肥施用时,测试的最有效预测因子--以空气饱和度赤字为标准的日蒸腾量--可以预测很大一部分特定地点和年份的谷物产量变化(R2 = 0.64)。这表明它可以作为制定氮管理策略的一个重要起点。因地而异的土壤质地对产量估算的改善微乎其微,R2 的增幅不到 0.05。研究结果表明,通过土壤水模型解释 GAI 可以发现影响冬小麦产量的水分限制,即使在温带气候条件下也是如此。这强调了持续研究的重要性,即在整个生长季节生成全面的、针对具体地点的 GAI 数据。除了本文讨论的结果和方法之外,这些数据还有可能在未来实现以产量预测为导向的氮肥管理,从而提高小麦种植的氮肥效率。
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.