Comparison of SEM-EDX and ICP-MS for the analysis of gunshot residues after burial: An experimental study

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Forensic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.fri.2024.200604
Morgan Nguyen-Hong , Bruno Payré , Sébastien Aries , Fabrice Dedouit , Norbert Telmon , Fréderic Savall , Céline Guilbeau-Frugier
{"title":"Comparison of SEM-EDX and ICP-MS for the analysis of gunshot residues after burial: An experimental study","authors":"Morgan Nguyen-Hong ,&nbsp;Bruno Payré ,&nbsp;Sébastien Aries ,&nbsp;Fabrice Dedouit ,&nbsp;Norbert Telmon ,&nbsp;Fréderic Savall ,&nbsp;Céline Guilbeau-Frugier","doi":"10.1016/j.fri.2024.200604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gunshot residues (GSR) analysis can be valuable in a forensic context for distinguishing entry wounds from exit wounds, especially in cases when body alterations prevent macroscopic analysis. Several studies have demonstrated its usefulness in various contexts. However, few studies have examined the retention of GSR under environmental conditions particularly after burial.</p><p>The primary objective of our experimental study is to investigate the retention of GSR after burial and decomposition by using two techniques: SEM-EDX and ICP-MS. Our secondary objective is to determine whether it is still possible to distinguish the entry wounds from the exit ones after 2 months of burial. For this study, we used a bovine model (cow feet), and fired with 7 mm semi-jacketed bullets. We formed several groups, including 3 control groups that hadn't been shot (buried for 2 days and 60 days and one unburied group), 3 test groups that had been shot (one unburied and two buried that were exhumed after 2 days and 60 days of burial).</p><p>The results of our study show that both SEM-EDX and ICP-MS were suitable for detecting particles characteristic of GSR, after 60 days of burial. However, only SEM-EDX could differentiate easily the entry wounds from the exit ones.</p><p>Our experimental study demonstrates that SEM-EDX analysis is suitable in cases where the discovery of a buried body doesn't allow the macroscopic determination of the ballistic trajectory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":40763,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Imaging","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 200604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666225624000289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gunshot residues (GSR) analysis can be valuable in a forensic context for distinguishing entry wounds from exit wounds, especially in cases when body alterations prevent macroscopic analysis. Several studies have demonstrated its usefulness in various contexts. However, few studies have examined the retention of GSR under environmental conditions particularly after burial.

The primary objective of our experimental study is to investigate the retention of GSR after burial and decomposition by using two techniques: SEM-EDX and ICP-MS. Our secondary objective is to determine whether it is still possible to distinguish the entry wounds from the exit ones after 2 months of burial. For this study, we used a bovine model (cow feet), and fired with 7 mm semi-jacketed bullets. We formed several groups, including 3 control groups that hadn't been shot (buried for 2 days and 60 days and one unburied group), 3 test groups that had been shot (one unburied and two buried that were exhumed after 2 days and 60 days of burial).

The results of our study show that both SEM-EDX and ICP-MS were suitable for detecting particles characteristic of GSR, after 60 days of burial. However, only SEM-EDX could differentiate easily the entry wounds from the exit ones.

Our experimental study demonstrates that SEM-EDX analysis is suitable in cases where the discovery of a buried body doesn't allow the macroscopic determination of the ballistic trajectory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 SEM-EDX 和 ICP-MS 对掩埋后枪弹残留物的分析:实验研究
在法医鉴定中,枪弹残留物(GSR)分析对于区分入口伤和出口伤很有价值,尤其是在身体改变无法进行宏观分析的情况下。一些研究已经证明了它在各种情况下的实用性。我们实验研究的主要目的是利用两种技术调查 GSR 在埋葬和分解后的保留情况:我们实验研究的主要目的是利用 SEM-EDX 和 ICP-MS 两种技术研究 GSR 在掩埋和分解后的保留情况。我们的次要目标是确定在掩埋 2 个月后是否仍有可能区分入口伤口和出口伤口。在这项研究中,我们使用了牛模型(牛脚),并使用 7 毫米半套筒子弹进行射击。研究结果表明,SEM-EDX 和 ICP-MS 都适用于检测埋葬 60 天后的 GSR 特征颗粒。我们的实验研究表明,SEM-EDX 分析适用于发现埋葬尸体后无法宏观确定弹道的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Imaging
Forensic Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
27.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Closed iris, long exposure photography improves three-dimensional photogrammetric bone reconstructions Cranial surgical approaches in the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection Unveiling the diagnostic accuracy of PMCT: Detection of pneumonia considering postmortem changes and time intervals Exploring lightweight convolution neural networks for segmenting striation marks from firearm bullet images Age estimation based on sternebral fusion in a sample of Egyptian population using three-dimensional computed tomography scanning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1