Improving pain management for trauma patients at two Rwandan emergency departments

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE African Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.009
{"title":"Improving pain management for trauma patients at two Rwandan emergency departments","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Little is known regarding the effectiveness of pain protocols and guideline use in Emergency Departments (ED) in Sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, to shed light on this research gap, this study had the following objectives: 1) to evaluate if the implementation of the Essential Pain Management (EPM) course combined with mentorship to use the World Health Organization (WHO) pain ladder-based protocol improves the quality of pain management among trauma patients at the ED of two teaching hospitals in Rwanda; and 2) to determine barriers to implementing the WHO pain ladder-based protocol among trauma patients in the same settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a pre- and post-intervention study. The intervention was 1-day essential pain management training for ED clinical staff followed by 1 week mentorship on the use of the WHO pain ladder-based protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We enrolled 261 patients (47.5% pre versus 52.5% post intervention), most of them were aged between 21 and 40 (60% pre versus 33% post intervention), and male (76% pre versus 73% post intervention). The quality of pain management at the ED improved as shown by the decrease of the number of patients with undocumented pain scores from 58% to 24% after the intervention (p-value &gt; 0.001) and the increase of the number of patients with mild pain from 37% to 62% (p-value &gt; 0.001). In addition, patients who were satisfied with the quality of pain management increased significantly from 42% before the intervention to 80% (p-value &gt; 0.001). Barriers to the implementation of the WHO pain ladder-based protocol were identified related to staff (i.e. inadequate experience), to the hospital (i.e. poor documentation), and to patients (i.e. reluctance to report pain).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The implementation of the EPM course along with mentorship to use the WHO pain ladder-based protocol significantly improved the quality of pain management for trauma patients in EDs of both referral hospitals. Despite this, some barriers remain unfixed such as inadequate staff experience, poor documentation, and patient's reluctance to report pain. Appropriate interventions should be implemented to address the identified barriers and ensure adequate pain management for patients admitted at EDs in public hospitals in Rwanda.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000387/pdfft?md5=602c8e513a76185e9c5f0722f5ace2d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X24000387-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little is known regarding the effectiveness of pain protocols and guideline use in Emergency Departments (ED) in Sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, to shed light on this research gap, this study had the following objectives: 1) to evaluate if the implementation of the Essential Pain Management (EPM) course combined with mentorship to use the World Health Organization (WHO) pain ladder-based protocol improves the quality of pain management among trauma patients at the ED of two teaching hospitals in Rwanda; and 2) to determine barriers to implementing the WHO pain ladder-based protocol among trauma patients in the same settings.

Methods

This was a pre- and post-intervention study. The intervention was 1-day essential pain management training for ED clinical staff followed by 1 week mentorship on the use of the WHO pain ladder-based protocol.

Results

We enrolled 261 patients (47.5% pre versus 52.5% post intervention), most of them were aged between 21 and 40 (60% pre versus 33% post intervention), and male (76% pre versus 73% post intervention). The quality of pain management at the ED improved as shown by the decrease of the number of patients with undocumented pain scores from 58% to 24% after the intervention (p-value > 0.001) and the increase of the number of patients with mild pain from 37% to 62% (p-value > 0.001). In addition, patients who were satisfied with the quality of pain management increased significantly from 42% before the intervention to 80% (p-value > 0.001). Barriers to the implementation of the WHO pain ladder-based protocol were identified related to staff (i.e. inadequate experience), to the hospital (i.e. poor documentation), and to patients (i.e. reluctance to report pain).

Conclusion

The implementation of the EPM course along with mentorship to use the WHO pain ladder-based protocol significantly improved the quality of pain management for trauma patients in EDs of both referral hospitals. Despite this, some barriers remain unfixed such as inadequate staff experience, poor documentation, and patient's reluctance to report pain. Appropriate interventions should be implemented to address the identified barriers and ensure adequate pain management for patients admitted at EDs in public hospitals in Rwanda.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善卢旺达两家急诊室对创伤患者的疼痛管理
背景对撒哈拉以南非洲地区急诊科(ED)疼痛治疗方案和指南使用的有效性知之甚少。因此,为了填补这一研究空白,本研究的目标如下:1)评估在卢旺达两家教学医院的急诊科实施基本疼痛管理(EPM)课程并指导患者使用世界卫生组织(WHO)基于疼痛阶梯的方案是否能提高创伤患者的疼痛管理质量;2)确定在相同环境下创伤患者实施基于疼痛阶梯的WHO方案的障碍。干预措施是对急诊室临床人员进行为期 1 天的基本疼痛管理培训,然后就如何使用世界卫生组织疼痛阶梯方案进行为期 1 周的指导。结果我们共招募了 261 名患者(干预前为 47.5%,干预后为 52.5%),其中大部分患者的年龄在 21 岁至 40 岁之间(干预前为 60%,干预后为 33%),男性(干预前为 76%,干预后为 73%)。干预后,未记录疼痛评分的患者人数从 58% 降至 24%(P 值为 0.001),轻度疼痛患者人数从 37% 增至 62%(P 值为 0.001),这表明急诊室的疼痛管理质量有所改善。此外,对疼痛治疗质量表示满意的患者从干预前的 42% 显著增加到 80%(p 值为 0.001)。结论在实施 EPM 课程的同时,还指导如何使用 WHO 疼痛阶梯方案,这大大提高了两家转诊医院急诊室创伤患者的疼痛管理质量。尽管如此,一些障碍仍未得到解决,如员工经验不足、记录不全以及患者不愿报告疼痛等。应采取适当的干预措施来解决已发现的障碍,确保卢旺达公立医院急诊室收治的患者得到充分的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
期刊最新文献
From vocational to graduation: A mixed methods study of support needs for vocational learners pursuing post-graduate education in South Africa Improving pain management for trauma patients at two Rwandan emergency departments Descriptive analysis of road traffic crashes encountered by Tanzanian motorcycle taxi drivers trained in first aid Workplace violence in three public sector emergency departments, Gauteng, South Africa: A cross-sectional survey Healthcare professionals perceptions towards the determinants of effective emergency health care services in public health centres of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1