Is energy planning consistent with climate goals? Assessing future emissions from power plants in Latin America and the Caribbean

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100151
{"title":"Is energy planning consistent with climate goals? Assessing future emissions from power plants in Latin America and the Caribbean","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ten Latin American and Caribbean countries have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality since 2019. We assess whether electricity planning in the region has evolved towards reaching this goal. We compare power generation capacity in 2023 with announced plans in 2019. We then estimate committed emissions from existing and planned power plants – emissions that would result from the normal operation of these plants during their typical lifetime – and compare them to emissions from power generation in published IPCC scenarios. We find that fossil fuel planned capacity has decreased by 47 % since 2019, compared to an increase of 24 % of planned renewable power plants. Countries with net-zero pledges tended to cancel more fossil fuel power capacity. But existing plants in the region will emit 6.7 GtCO<sub>2</sub> during their lifespan, and if all planned fossil fuel plants are built, they will add 4.9 GtCO<sub>2</sub>. The total 11.6 GtCO<sub>2</sub> emissions exceeds median carbon budgets for 1.5 and 2 °C-consistent IPCC pathways (2.3 and 4.3 GtCO<sub>2</sub>). Natural gas power plants are the largest contributor to existing (62 %) and planned (75 %) emissions. We evaluate emissions reduction strategies to achieve carbon budgets. Assuming no new coal plants come into operation, announced gas and oil projects are canceled at the same rate as in the past four years, all fossil fueled plant lifetimes are reduced by 10 years, and all new natural gas displaces existing coal, committed emissions fall by 67 %, meeting the median 2 °C budget, but still falling short of the median 1.5 °C budget. While progress is being made, energy planning in the region is not yet consistent with global climate goals as reflected by IPCC scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ten Latin American and Caribbean countries have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality since 2019. We assess whether electricity planning in the region has evolved towards reaching this goal. We compare power generation capacity in 2023 with announced plans in 2019. We then estimate committed emissions from existing and planned power plants – emissions that would result from the normal operation of these plants during their typical lifetime – and compare them to emissions from power generation in published IPCC scenarios. We find that fossil fuel planned capacity has decreased by 47 % since 2019, compared to an increase of 24 % of planned renewable power plants. Countries with net-zero pledges tended to cancel more fossil fuel power capacity. But existing plants in the region will emit 6.7 GtCO2 during their lifespan, and if all planned fossil fuel plants are built, they will add 4.9 GtCO2. The total 11.6 GtCO2 emissions exceeds median carbon budgets for 1.5 and 2 °C-consistent IPCC pathways (2.3 and 4.3 GtCO2). Natural gas power plants are the largest contributor to existing (62 %) and planned (75 %) emissions. We evaluate emissions reduction strategies to achieve carbon budgets. Assuming no new coal plants come into operation, announced gas and oil projects are canceled at the same rate as in the past four years, all fossil fueled plant lifetimes are reduced by 10 years, and all new natural gas displaces existing coal, committed emissions fall by 67 %, meeting the median 2 °C budget, but still falling short of the median 1.5 °C budget. While progress is being made, energy planning in the region is not yet consistent with global climate goals as reflected by IPCC scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能源规划是否符合气候目标?评估拉丁美洲和加勒比地区发电厂未来的排放量
十个拉丁美洲和加勒比国家已承诺自 2019 年起实现碳中和。我们将评估该地区的电力规划是否已朝着实现这一目标的方向发展。我们将 2023 年的发电能力与 2019 年公布的计划进行了比较。然后,我们估算了现有和规划中发电厂的承诺排放量--这些发电厂在其典型使用寿命内正常运行所产生的排放量--并将其与政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)公布的情景下的发电排放量进行比较。我们发现,自 2019 年以来,化石燃料的规划发电量减少了 47%,而规划的可再生能源发电厂则增加了 24%。净零承诺的国家倾向于取消更多的化石燃料发电能力。但是,该地区现有电厂在其生命周期内将排放 6.7 千兆吨二氧化碳,如果所有规划的化石燃料电厂都建成,则将增加 4.9 千兆吨二氧化碳。11.6 GtCO2 的总排放量超过了与 1.5 和 2 °C 一致的 IPCC 途径的碳预算中值(2.3 和 4.3 GtCO2)。天然气发电厂是现有排放量(62%)和计划排放量(75%)的最大贡献者。我们评估了实现碳预算的减排战略。假设没有新的煤电厂投产,已宣布的天然气和石油项目以与过去四年相同的速度被取消,所有化石燃料发电厂的寿命缩短 10 年,所有新的天然气取代现有的煤炭,则承诺的排放量将下降 67%,达到中位数 2 °C 预算,但仍低于中位数 1.5 °C 预算。虽然正在取得进展,但该地区的能源规划还不符合 IPCC 预测的全球气候目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing green hydrogen and green ammonia as energy carriers in utility-scale transport and subsurface storage Global trade of green iron as a game changer for a near-zero global steel industry? - A scenario-based assessment of regionalized impacts Strategic approach to accelerating regional bioenergy development: Bioelectricity for emission reduction and sustainability The role of the pulp and paper industry in achieving net zero U.S. CO2 emissions in 2050 Exploring attitudes and behavioral patterns in residential energy consumption: Data-driven by a machine learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1