Comparison of spatiotemporal gait parameter measurements across various emulated foot strike patterns between the Tekscan® Strideway™ pressure sensitive walkway and gold-standard marker-based motion capture

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112310
{"title":"Comparison of spatiotemporal gait parameter measurements across various emulated foot strike patterns between the Tekscan® Strideway™ pressure sensitive walkway and gold-standard marker-based motion capture","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spatiotemporal gait parameters are commonly used to quantify physical functioning including in populations with atypical foot strike patterns. The current gold standard measurement system for gait analysis is marker-based motion capture and floor-mounted force plates, but it can be expensive and cumbersome to set up. Pressure sensitive walkways are more affordable, quicker to set up, and more portable. Currently available walkways have not been compared to marker-based motion capture when measuring atypical foot strike patterns. The recently developed Tekscan® Strideway pressure sensitive walkway system has not been compared to any gold standard. This study compared measurements of step width, step length, and step time from the Strideway™ system against a gold standard marker-based motion capture (Vicon® Vantage™) and floor-mounted force plate (AMTI®) system. Ten typically ambulating adults, free of injury, emulated five different foot strike patterns recording two-hundred footsteps for each. Results indicate that the Strideway™ compares well to the gold standard especially under typical foot strike patterns. The errors were highest for step width and near-zero for step time. However, the user needs to be aware that errors can substantially increase with certain foot strike patterns such as when the heel does not make contact with the walkway. The results of this study will help inform users about potential limitations when using a pressure sensitive walkway like the Strideway™ for testing populations with typical and atypical strike patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024003889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatiotemporal gait parameters are commonly used to quantify physical functioning including in populations with atypical foot strike patterns. The current gold standard measurement system for gait analysis is marker-based motion capture and floor-mounted force plates, but it can be expensive and cumbersome to set up. Pressure sensitive walkways are more affordable, quicker to set up, and more portable. Currently available walkways have not been compared to marker-based motion capture when measuring atypical foot strike patterns. The recently developed Tekscan® Strideway pressure sensitive walkway system has not been compared to any gold standard. This study compared measurements of step width, step length, and step time from the Strideway™ system against a gold standard marker-based motion capture (Vicon® Vantage™) and floor-mounted force plate (AMTI®) system. Ten typically ambulating adults, free of injury, emulated five different foot strike patterns recording two-hundred footsteps for each. Results indicate that the Strideway™ compares well to the gold standard especially under typical foot strike patterns. The errors were highest for step width and near-zero for step time. However, the user needs to be aware that errors can substantially increase with certain foot strike patterns such as when the heel does not make contact with the walkway. The results of this study will help inform users about potential limitations when using a pressure sensitive walkway like the Strideway™ for testing populations with typical and atypical strike patterns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tekscan® Strideway™ 压敏步道与基于黄金标准标记的运动捕捉系统对各种模拟脚部着地模式的时空步态参数测量结果的比较
时空步态参数通常用于量化身体机能,包括具有非典型足部打击模式的人群。目前步态分析的黄金标准测量系统是基于标记的运动捕捉和地面安装的测力板,但价格昂贵且设置繁琐。压敏步行道更经济实惠、设置更快、更便于携带。在测量非典型足部打击模式时,目前可用的步道尚未与基于标记的运动捕捉进行比较。最近开发的 Tekscan® Strideway 压敏步行道系统也未与任何黄金标准进行比较。本研究将 Strideway™ 系统的步宽、步长和步长测量结果与基于标记的黄金标准运动捕捉系统(Vicon® Vantage™)和地面安装的测力板(AMTI®)系统进行了比较。十名正常行走的成年人在没有受伤的情况下模拟了五种不同的脚步模式,每种模式记录了两百个脚步。结果表明,Strideway™ 与黄金标准的比较结果良好,尤其是在典型的脚步模式下。步幅误差最大,步长误差接近零。不过,用户需要注意的是,在某些脚步模式下,误差会大大增加,例如脚跟没有接触到人行道时。这项研究的结果将有助于用户了解在使用 Strideway™ 等压敏步行道测试具有典型和非典型击球模式的人群时可能存在的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Intervertebral disc deformation in the lower lumbar spine during object lifting measured in vivo using indwelling bone pins. Energetic scaling behavior of patterned epithelium A clinical investigation of force plate drift error on predicted joint kinetics during gait. Strategies for unplanned gait termination at comfortable and fast walking speeds in children with cerebral palsy. Effects of foot orthoses application during walking on lower limb joint angles and moments in adults with flat Feet: A systematic review with Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1