Milena Simić , Vesna Dragičević , Alexandros Tataridas , Tsvetelina Krachunova , Jelena Srdić , Ioannis Gazoulis , Milan Brankov
{"title":"Integrated effects of crop rotation and different herbicide rates in maize (Zea mays L.) production in central Serbia","authors":"Milena Simić , Vesna Dragičević , Alexandros Tataridas , Tsvetelina Krachunova , Jelena Srdić , Ioannis Gazoulis , Milan Brankov","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Successful maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) cultivation is largely reliable by weed interference. Among weeds, annual species are usually dominant, whereas less prevalent perennials can be challenging to control, too. Driven by profitability, maize is often cultivated continuously using the same management practices over time, resulting in increased weed infestations, particularly perennials. However, crop rotation might reduce the abundance of weed species, lower herbicide impact on the environment, delaying herbicide resistance occurrence in weeds and thus contribute to sustainable maize production,. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of continuous maize cropping (Maize-CC) and a three-crop rotation, maize–winter wheat–soybean (Maize-WW-S), in combination with three weed management treatments: 1) application of a pre-emergence herbicide mixture of acetochlor/S-metolachlor + isoxaflutole at the full label rate, 2) at ½ of full label rate, and 3) an the untreated control, over a 12-year period. The trial was initiated in 2009, and maize was grown in both cropping systems, Maize-CC and Maize-WW-S, in 2012, 2015, 2018, and in 2021. Total weed density, fresh biomass of all annual and perennial weed species and total dry biomass of all weed species was measured four weeks after herbicide application. Maize leaf area index (LAI) was measured at the anthesis, whereas grain yield was measured at the end of the growing cycle. Weed species diversity, number of individuals, weed fresh and dry biomass, were significantly lower with the combination of Maize-WW-S and the herbicide treatments. Grain yield was significantly and negatively correlated with the fresh weight of annual weeds in Maize-CC and was higher in both herbicide treatments, especially in Maize-WW-S. There was no significant difference between pre-emergence herbicide full labelled rate and ½ of the labelled rate in reducing the total fresh weed biomass in Maize-CC (66.3% and 65.9%, respectively) and Maize-WW-S (92.1% and 85.8%, respectively). Thus, the importance of the combined employment of rotation and chemical measures in maize production was confirmed and could be adopted for long-term weed management without compromising yields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 106913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424003417/pdfft?md5=25ccee43fe1eacc0762a0e67c928088e&pid=1-s2.0-S0261219424003417-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424003417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Successful maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation is largely reliable by weed interference. Among weeds, annual species are usually dominant, whereas less prevalent perennials can be challenging to control, too. Driven by profitability, maize is often cultivated continuously using the same management practices over time, resulting in increased weed infestations, particularly perennials. However, crop rotation might reduce the abundance of weed species, lower herbicide impact on the environment, delaying herbicide resistance occurrence in weeds and thus contribute to sustainable maize production,. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of continuous maize cropping (Maize-CC) and a three-crop rotation, maize–winter wheat–soybean (Maize-WW-S), in combination with three weed management treatments: 1) application of a pre-emergence herbicide mixture of acetochlor/S-metolachlor + isoxaflutole at the full label rate, 2) at ½ of full label rate, and 3) an the untreated control, over a 12-year period. The trial was initiated in 2009, and maize was grown in both cropping systems, Maize-CC and Maize-WW-S, in 2012, 2015, 2018, and in 2021. Total weed density, fresh biomass of all annual and perennial weed species and total dry biomass of all weed species was measured four weeks after herbicide application. Maize leaf area index (LAI) was measured at the anthesis, whereas grain yield was measured at the end of the growing cycle. Weed species diversity, number of individuals, weed fresh and dry biomass, were significantly lower with the combination of Maize-WW-S and the herbicide treatments. Grain yield was significantly and negatively correlated with the fresh weight of annual weeds in Maize-CC and was higher in both herbicide treatments, especially in Maize-WW-S. There was no significant difference between pre-emergence herbicide full labelled rate and ½ of the labelled rate in reducing the total fresh weed biomass in Maize-CC (66.3% and 65.9%, respectively) and Maize-WW-S (92.1% and 85.8%, respectively). Thus, the importance of the combined employment of rotation and chemical measures in maize production was confirmed and could be adopted for long-term weed management without compromising yields.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.