Sharing midwifery philosophy through a positive learning environment prepares students for a future providing midwifery continuity of care: A mixed method study

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Women and Birth Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101808
{"title":"Sharing midwifery philosophy through a positive learning environment prepares students for a future providing midwifery continuity of care: A mixed method study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Global and national frameworks for midwifery education recognise and prioritise the provision of midwifery continuity of care. Previous studies report that learning is enhanced when students have professional experience placements within these models, however there remains wide variation in midwifery students’ access to placements within these models in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To evaluate Bachelor of Midwifery students’ experiences in midwifery continuity of care models within two local health districts in New South Wales, Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A mixed methods design was used: qualitative data collected through interviews, and quantitative data collected via an online survey using the Midwifery Student Evaluation of Practice (MidSTEP) tool. Thematic analysis of qualitative data and descriptive analysis of quantitative data was undertaken.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen students responded, four students were interviewed, and 12 students completed the survey. The MidSTEP mean scores for all sub-scales rated above 3.0/4.0. Participants rated ‘work across the full scope of midwifery practice’ and five out of eight subscales of Philosophy of Midwifery Practice at 100 %. ‘Experiences prepare me to be a change agent for maternity service reform’ rated the lowest (67 %). Three qualitative themes emerged: care versus carer model; learning experience; and future career as a caseload midwife.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A mixed method approach using a validated tool to measure student experiences, contributes to the evidence that students value professional experience placements within midwifery continuity of care models. Currently this is not an option for all midwifery students and as midwifery continuity of care models expand, these findings will inform further implementation of student professional experience placement within these models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002683/pdfft?md5=fc263a75242dfebea4c28b5a24d57fb8&pid=1-s2.0-S1871519224002683-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Global and national frameworks for midwifery education recognise and prioritise the provision of midwifery continuity of care. Previous studies report that learning is enhanced when students have professional experience placements within these models, however there remains wide variation in midwifery students’ access to placements within these models in Australia.

Aim

To evaluate Bachelor of Midwifery students’ experiences in midwifery continuity of care models within two local health districts in New South Wales, Australia.

Method

A mixed methods design was used: qualitative data collected through interviews, and quantitative data collected via an online survey using the Midwifery Student Evaluation of Practice (MidSTEP) tool. Thematic analysis of qualitative data and descriptive analysis of quantitative data was undertaken.

Results

Sixteen students responded, four students were interviewed, and 12 students completed the survey. The MidSTEP mean scores for all sub-scales rated above 3.0/4.0. Participants rated ‘work across the full scope of midwifery practice’ and five out of eight subscales of Philosophy of Midwifery Practice at 100 %. ‘Experiences prepare me to be a change agent for maternity service reform’ rated the lowest (67 %). Three qualitative themes emerged: care versus carer model; learning experience; and future career as a caseload midwife.

Conclusion

A mixed method approach using a validated tool to measure student experiences, contributes to the evidence that students value professional experience placements within midwifery continuity of care models. Currently this is not an option for all midwifery students and as midwifery continuity of care models expand, these findings will inform further implementation of student professional experience placement within these models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过积极的学习环境分享助产理念,为学生将来提供持续的助产护理做好准备:混合方法研究
背景全球和国家助产士教育框架承认并优先考虑提供助产士连续性护理。之前的研究报告显示,如果学生在这些模式下进行专业实习,学习效果会更好,但在澳大利亚,助产士学生在这些模式下的实习机会仍存在很大差异。方法采用混合方法设计:通过访谈收集定性数据,并使用助产士学生实践评估(MidSTEP)工具通过在线调查收集定量数据。对定性数据进行了主题分析,对定量数据进行了描述性分析。结果 16 名学生做出了回应,4 名学生接受了访谈,12 名学生完成了调查。所有子量表的 MidSTEP 平均得分均超过 3.0/4.0。参与者对 "助产实践的全部工作 "以及助产实践哲学八个分量表中的五个分量表的评分均为 100%。经历让我做好了成为产科服务改革推动者的准备 "得分最低(67%)。出现了三个定性主题:护理与照顾者模式;学习经验;以及作为一名个案助产士的未来职业。目前,并非所有的助产士学生都能选择这种方式,随着助产士持续护理模式的扩展,这些研究结果将为在这些模式中进一步实施学生专业体验实习提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
期刊最新文献
The acceptability of implementation of group B Streptococcus testing: Perspectives from women and health professionals in the GBS3 trial: A qualitative study Women and midwives’ experiences of an audio-visual enhanced hospital birth environment: An interview study “Where’s my baby?” A feminist phenomenological study of women experiencing preventable separation from their baby at caesarean birth The neurodivergent perinatal experience — A systematic literature review on autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Pandemic-related prenatal maternal stress, model of maternity care and postpartum mental health: The Australian BITTOC study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1