The comparative techno-economic and life cycle assessment for multi-product biorefinery based on microwave and conventional hydrothermal biomass pretreatment

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143562
{"title":"The comparative techno-economic and life cycle assessment for multi-product biorefinery based on microwave and conventional hydrothermal biomass pretreatment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microwave as an efficient and clean energy, is easy integrated with DES pretreatment and biorefinery process to achieve process intensification for cleaner production and sustainable development. However, there are worries about its economic and environmental feasibility for application in biorefinery plant. This work conducted the techno-economic (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of the entire biorefinery process based on DES pretreatment by microwave heating (MH) for producing glucose, furfural and lignin from lignocellulose, of which the results were compared with conventional heating (CH). For pretreating equivalent biomass, the total yield of products obtained from MH-assisted process was 8.53% higher than that of CH-assisted process due to microwave intensification effect. From the perspective of cradle-to-gate LCA, the MH-assisted process saved energy demand of 5.82%, reducing the environmental impacts global warming (GW) and fossil resource scarcity (FRS) by 4.85% and 5.69%, respectively, relative to CH-assisted process. The main environmental hotspots of both two processes concentrated on the raw material extraction (RME), followed by product separation and solvent recovery (PSSR) stages. Based on economic evaluation, the specific values of TAC regarding one-ton product for MH- and CH-assisted processes were 3194.35 and 3400.37 $/(y⋅t), respectively. Therefore, the MH-assisted pretreatment possessed certain environmental and economic advantages due to product increasement, energy consumption reduction in the DES pretreatment, and burden reduction for subsequent enzyme hydrolysis. Compared to the single-product biorefinery, the multi-product biorefinery strategy was more sustainable and could maximize the advantages of microwave intensification. However, some issues about the design of microwave reactors and temperature monitoring must be considered to pursue scale-up biorefinery plant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624030117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microwave as an efficient and clean energy, is easy integrated with DES pretreatment and biorefinery process to achieve process intensification for cleaner production and sustainable development. However, there are worries about its economic and environmental feasibility for application in biorefinery plant. This work conducted the techno-economic (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of the entire biorefinery process based on DES pretreatment by microwave heating (MH) for producing glucose, furfural and lignin from lignocellulose, of which the results were compared with conventional heating (CH). For pretreating equivalent biomass, the total yield of products obtained from MH-assisted process was 8.53% higher than that of CH-assisted process due to microwave intensification effect. From the perspective of cradle-to-gate LCA, the MH-assisted process saved energy demand of 5.82%, reducing the environmental impacts global warming (GW) and fossil resource scarcity (FRS) by 4.85% and 5.69%, respectively, relative to CH-assisted process. The main environmental hotspots of both two processes concentrated on the raw material extraction (RME), followed by product separation and solvent recovery (PSSR) stages. Based on economic evaluation, the specific values of TAC regarding one-ton product for MH- and CH-assisted processes were 3194.35 and 3400.37 $/(y⋅t), respectively. Therefore, the MH-assisted pretreatment possessed certain environmental and economic advantages due to product increasement, energy consumption reduction in the DES pretreatment, and burden reduction for subsequent enzyme hydrolysis. Compared to the single-product biorefinery, the multi-product biorefinery strategy was more sustainable and could maximize the advantages of microwave intensification. However, some issues about the design of microwave reactors and temperature monitoring must be considered to pursue scale-up biorefinery plant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于微波和传统水热生物质预处理的多产品生物精炼厂的技术经济和生命周期比较评估
微波作为一种高效清洁的能源,很容易与 DES 预处理和生物精炼工艺相结合,从而实现工艺集约化,以实现清洁生产和可持续发展。然而,微波在生物精炼厂中应用的经济和环境可行性令人担忧。本研究对基于微波加热(MH)的 DES 预处理从木质纤维素中生产葡萄糖、糠醛和木质素的整个生物精炼工艺进行了技术经济(TEA)和生命周期评估(LCA),并将结果与传统加热(CH)进行了比较。在预处理等量生物质的情况下,由于微波强化效应,MH 辅助工艺获得的产品总产率比 CH 辅助工艺高 8.53%。从 "从摇篮到终点 "生命周期评估的角度来看,MH 辅助工艺比 CH 辅助工艺节约了 5.82% 的能源需求,分别减少了 4.85% 和 5.69% 的全球变暖(GW)和化石资源稀缺(FRS)环境影响。两种工艺的主要环境热点都集中在原料提取(RME)阶段,其次是产品分离和溶剂回收(PSSR)阶段。根据经济评价,MH 辅助工艺和 CH 辅助工艺每吨产品的 TAC 具体值分别为 3194.35 美元/(y⋅t)和 3400.37 美元/(y⋅t)。因此,MH辅助预处理在增加产品、减少DES预处理能耗、减轻后续酶水解负担等方面具有一定的环境和经济优势。与单产品生物精炼相比,多产品生物精炼战略更具可持续性,可最大限度地发挥微波强化的优势。不过,要实现生物精炼厂的规模化生产,还必须考虑微波反应器的设计和温度监测方面的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Carbon Trading Mechanisms through Innovative Collaboration: Case Studies from Developing Nations Microplastics and their interaction with microorganisms in Bosten Lake Water Consumers' green product purchase intention considering para-social interaction: An experimental study based on live-streaming e-commerce Utilization of Spent Graphite from Lithium-ion Batteries Waste as Sustainable Reinforcing Filler for Thermal, Vibration-Damping, and Noise Control Applications Applications of Machine Learning in Drinking Water Quality Management: A Critical Review on Water Distribution System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1