Upendra Kumar Pradhan , Prasanjit Behera , Ritwika Das , Sanchita Naha , Ajit Gupta , Rajender Parsad , Sukanta Kumar Pradhan , Prabina Kumar Meher
{"title":"AScirRNA: A novel computational approach to discover abiotic stress-responsive circular RNAs in plant genome","authors":"Upendra Kumar Pradhan , Prasanjit Behera , Ritwika Das , Sanchita Naha , Ajit Gupta , Rajender Parsad , Sukanta Kumar Pradhan , Prabina Kumar Meher","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the realm of plant biology, understanding the intricate regulatory mechanisms governing stress responses stands as a pivotal pursuit. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), emerging as critical players in gene regulation, have garnered attention in recent days for their potential roles in abiotic stress adaptation. A comprehensive grasp of circRNAs' functions in stress response offers avenues for breeders to manipulating plants to develop abiotic stress resistant crop cultivars to thrive in challenging climates. This study pioneers a machine learning-based model for predicting abiotic stress-responsive circRNAs. The K-tuple nucleotide composition (KNC) and Pseudo KNC (PKNC) features were utilized to numerically represent circRNAs. Three different feature selection strategies were employed to select relevant and non-redundant features. Eight shallow and four deep learning algorithms were evaluated to build the final predictive model. Following five-fold cross-validation process, XGBoost learning algorithm demonstrated superior performance with LightGBM-chosen 260 KNC features (Accuracy: 74.55 %, auROC: 81.23 %, auPRC: 76.52 %) and 160 PKNC features (Accuracy: 74.32 %, auROC: 81.04 %, auPRC: 76.43 %), over other combinations of learning algorithms and feature selection techniques. Further, the robustness of the developed models were evaluated using an independent test dataset, where the overall accuracy, auROC and auPRC were found to be 73.13 %, 72.34 % and 72.68 % for KNC feature set and 73.52 %, 79.53 % and 73.09 % for PKNC feature set, respectively. This computational approach was also integrated into an online prediction tool, AScirRNA (<span><span>https://iasri-sg.icar.gov.in/ascirna/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) for easy prediction by the users. Both the proposed model and the developed tool are poised to augment ongoing efforts in identifying stress-responsive circRNAs in plants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 108205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927124001932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the realm of plant biology, understanding the intricate regulatory mechanisms governing stress responses stands as a pivotal pursuit. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), emerging as critical players in gene regulation, have garnered attention in recent days for their potential roles in abiotic stress adaptation. A comprehensive grasp of circRNAs' functions in stress response offers avenues for breeders to manipulating plants to develop abiotic stress resistant crop cultivars to thrive in challenging climates. This study pioneers a machine learning-based model for predicting abiotic stress-responsive circRNAs. The K-tuple nucleotide composition (KNC) and Pseudo KNC (PKNC) features were utilized to numerically represent circRNAs. Three different feature selection strategies were employed to select relevant and non-redundant features. Eight shallow and four deep learning algorithms were evaluated to build the final predictive model. Following five-fold cross-validation process, XGBoost learning algorithm demonstrated superior performance with LightGBM-chosen 260 KNC features (Accuracy: 74.55 %, auROC: 81.23 %, auPRC: 76.52 %) and 160 PKNC features (Accuracy: 74.32 %, auROC: 81.04 %, auPRC: 76.43 %), over other combinations of learning algorithms and feature selection techniques. Further, the robustness of the developed models were evaluated using an independent test dataset, where the overall accuracy, auROC and auPRC were found to be 73.13 %, 72.34 % and 72.68 % for KNC feature set and 73.52 %, 79.53 % and 73.09 % for PKNC feature set, respectively. This computational approach was also integrated into an online prediction tool, AScirRNA (https://iasri-sg.icar.gov.in/ascirna/) for easy prediction by the users. Both the proposed model and the developed tool are poised to augment ongoing efforts in identifying stress-responsive circRNAs in plants.
期刊介绍:
Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered.
Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered.
Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.