Culturally responsive teaching in question: A multiple case study examining the complexity and interplay of teacher practices, beliefs, and microaggressions in Germany

IF 4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching and Teacher Education Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104772
Judith Kehl , Priscilla Krachum Ott , Maja Schachner , Sauro Civitillo
{"title":"Culturally responsive teaching in question: A multiple case study examining the complexity and interplay of teacher practices, beliefs, and microaggressions in Germany","authors":"Judith Kehl ,&nbsp;Priscilla Krachum Ott ,&nbsp;Maja Schachner ,&nbsp;Sauro Civitillo","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2024.104772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Culturally responsive teaching (CRT) is viewed to promote equity, yet critics argue it may be tokenistic, resembling liberal multiculturalism without encouraging critical thinking and anti-racism. Seeking to understand CRT complexities, a multiple case study design including structured observations and interviews with five secondary school teachers in Germany, explored the interplay of CRT practices, teacher beliefs, and microaggressions. CRT practices varied, while teachers perpetuated deficit- and racist ideologies and often overlooking structural causes. Classroom microaggressions perpetrated by teachers went unrecognized (as problematic) in post-interview reflections. Our research emphasizes the need to reposition critical thinking as its foundation for promoting equity in classrooms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 104772"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24003056/pdfft?md5=09e2b1b9f4ba44dbac31357db3ddeaa7&pid=1-s2.0-S0742051X24003056-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24003056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Culturally responsive teaching (CRT) is viewed to promote equity, yet critics argue it may be tokenistic, resembling liberal multiculturalism without encouraging critical thinking and anti-racism. Seeking to understand CRT complexities, a multiple case study design including structured observations and interviews with five secondary school teachers in Germany, explored the interplay of CRT practices, teacher beliefs, and microaggressions. CRT practices varied, while teachers perpetuated deficit- and racist ideologies and often overlooking structural causes. Classroom microaggressions perpetrated by teachers went unrecognized (as problematic) in post-interview reflections. Our research emphasizes the need to reposition critical thinking as its foundation for promoting equity in classrooms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有问题的文化敏感性教学:一项多案例研究,探讨德国教师的做法、信念和微侵害的复杂性和相互作用
文化敏感性教学(CRT)被认为能促进公平,但批评者认为它可能是象征性的,类似于自由主义的多元文化主义,没有鼓励批判性思维和反种族主义。为了了解顺应文化需求教学的复杂性,我们采用了多案例研究设计,包括对德国五名中学教师进行结构化观察和访谈,探讨了顺应文化需求教学实践、教师信念和微观偏见之间的相互作用。CRT 的做法各不相同,而教师则延续着赤字和种族主义的意识形态,往往忽视了结构性原因。在访谈后的反思中,教师在课堂上实施的微观诽谤没有被认识到(存在问题)。我们的研究强调,需要重新定位批判性思维,将其作为促进课堂公平的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Teacher Education
Teaching and Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
86 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
On “nature” and “nurture”: Black Educators’ backgrounds, teacher education experiences, and race-related pedagogical beliefs “It starts with me!” Teachers’ shifting perspectives on developing their practice away from fixed ability grouping Profiles of teacher self-efficacy and their relations to teacher demographics and affective well-being: A social cognitive perspective Enhancing digital literacy in foreign language teaching in Chinese universities: Insights from a systematic review The impact of practicum job demands and resources on pre-service teachers’ occupational commitment and job intent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1