Resin sealant Monomer Conversion using blue laser-diode or blue LED

Caroline Dudish, Tori Hayes, Frederick Allen Rueggeberg, Rafael Rocha Pacheco
{"title":"Resin sealant Monomer Conversion using blue laser-diode or blue LED","authors":"Caroline Dudish,&nbsp;Tori Hayes,&nbsp;Frederick Allen Rueggeberg,&nbsp;Rafael Rocha Pacheco","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2024.100099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Evaluate the degree of monomer conversion (DC) of various resin sealants when photocured using a blue laser-diode or commercially available LED light-curing units (LCUs).</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Three different LCUs were utilized: [LA] blue laser-diode (Monet®, AMD Lasers); [SP] singlepeak blue LED (Elipar™ DeepCure-S, 3M Deutschland GmbH); [MP] multi-peak LED (VALO™ X, Ultradent Products). The spectral irradiance of each LCU was measured using a calibrated integrating sphere/spectral radiometer. Two resin sealants were tested: [CP] Clinpro™ Sealant (3M ESPE) and [XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™ (Ultradent Products). Sealants were placed and cured on extracted, human third molars to determine the average sealant clinical thickness: 2.0 mm. Resin sealants (n = 5) were directly dispensed onto the temperature-controlled surface (35oC) of an attenuated total reflectance attachment (Golden Gate; Specac Inc) on a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (INVENIO-R, Bruker) inside a custom 3D-printed mold: 2mmh; 5mm-id. LCU distance was standardized at 2.5mm. A Mylar® strip was positioned over the resin sealant for uniform thickness. Exposure durations were defined as: LA-1s, LA-2s, LA-3s, SP-30s, MP-10s (standard mode), and MP-3s (“xtra” mode). The DC (%) was computed using vibrational spectroscopy software (OPUS, Bruker) using peak height ratio changes of aromatic/aliphatic C=C, assessed at five 1-minute intervals. Each resin sealant was exposed using its manufacturer recommended LCU and also with LA. Data analysis was performed using software (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) employing ANOVA at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>For each sealant, both SP-30s and MP-10s achieved a higher DC than LA-1s. While SP-30s surpassed LA-2s, MP-10s equaled LA-2. There was no DC difference between LA-3, SP-30s, and MP-10s. MP-3s was not different from LA2s.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Using manufacturer's suggested LCU and exposure yielded higher DC than a 1-second laser exposure. Extending laser exposure to 3 seconds made DC values comparable. Further research is needed to address clinical ramifications of employing a laser-diode LCU.</p></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><p>Using the manufacturer-recommended light-curing unit (LCU) and cure duration yielded results similar to those of the 3-second exposure with the LA curing light, but not to the 1-second cure suggested by the LA manufacturer. Employing a 3-second LA curing light method could be a suitable option for placing sealants (small areas) in uncooperative children and patients who would benefit from reduced chair time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221/pdfft?md5=d8c42ae748eb6ff31f4dd68c86ad34ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559624000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559624000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the degree of monomer conversion (DC) of various resin sealants when photocured using a blue laser-diode or commercially available LED light-curing units (LCUs).

METHODS

Three different LCUs were utilized: [LA] blue laser-diode (Monet®, AMD Lasers); [SP] singlepeak blue LED (Elipar™ DeepCure-S, 3M Deutschland GmbH); [MP] multi-peak LED (VALO™ X, Ultradent Products). The spectral irradiance of each LCU was measured using a calibrated integrating sphere/spectral radiometer. Two resin sealants were tested: [CP] Clinpro™ Sealant (3M ESPE) and [XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™ (Ultradent Products). Sealants were placed and cured on extracted, human third molars to determine the average sealant clinical thickness: 2.0 mm. Resin sealants (n = 5) were directly dispensed onto the temperature-controlled surface (35oC) of an attenuated total reflectance attachment (Golden Gate; Specac Inc) on a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (INVENIO-R, Bruker) inside a custom 3D-printed mold: 2mmh; 5mm-id. LCU distance was standardized at 2.5mm. A Mylar® strip was positioned over the resin sealant for uniform thickness. Exposure durations were defined as: LA-1s, LA-2s, LA-3s, SP-30s, MP-10s (standard mode), and MP-3s (“xtra” mode). The DC (%) was computed using vibrational spectroscopy software (OPUS, Bruker) using peak height ratio changes of aromatic/aliphatic C=C, assessed at five 1-minute intervals. Each resin sealant was exposed using its manufacturer recommended LCU and also with LA. Data analysis was performed using software (GraphPad Prism 10.0.2) employing ANOVA at a pre-set alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

For each sealant, both SP-30s and MP-10s achieved a higher DC than LA-1s. While SP-30s surpassed LA-2s, MP-10s equaled LA-2. There was no DC difference between LA-3, SP-30s, and MP-10s. MP-3s was not different from LA2s.

CONCLUSIONS

Using manufacturer's suggested LCU and exposure yielded higher DC than a 1-second laser exposure. Extending laser exposure to 3 seconds made DC values comparable. Further research is needed to address clinical ramifications of employing a laser-diode LCU.

IMPLICATIONS

Using the manufacturer-recommended light-curing unit (LCU) and cure duration yielded results similar to those of the 3-second exposure with the LA curing light, but not to the 1-second cure suggested by the LA manufacturer. Employing a 3-second LA curing light method could be a suitable option for placing sealants (small areas) in uncooperative children and patients who would benefit from reduced chair time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用蓝色激光二极管或蓝色发光二极管进行树脂密封剂单体转换
目的评估使用蓝色激光二极管或市售 LED 光固化装置(LCU)进行光固化时各种树脂密封剂的单体转换(DC)程度:[LA] 蓝色激光二极管(Monet®,AMD Lasers);[SP] 单峰值蓝色 LED(Elipar™ DeepCure-S,3M Deutschland GmbH);[MP] 多峰值 LED(VALO™ X,Ultradent Products)。使用校准积分球/光谱辐射计测量每个 LCU 的光谱辐照度。测试了两种树脂密封剂:[CP] Clinpro™ 密封剂(3M ESPE)和[XT] UltraSeal XT™ hydro™(Ultradent Products)。在拔出的人类第三磨牙上放置并固化封闭剂,以确定封闭剂的平均临床厚度:2.0 毫米。将树脂封闭剂(n = 5)直接涂抹在傅立叶变换红外光谱仪(INVENIO-R,布鲁克公司)的衰减全反射附件(Golden Gate;Specac Inc)的温控表面(35oC)上,该附件位于定制的 3D 打印模具内:2mmh;5mm-id。LCU 距离标准化为 2.5mm。在树脂密封剂上放置了一条 Mylar® 带,以保证厚度均匀。曝光持续时间定义为LA-1s、LA-2s、LA-3s、SP-30s、MP-10s(标准模式)和 MP-3s("额外 "模式)。使用振动光谱软件(OPUS,布鲁克公司),利用芳香族/脂肪族 C=C 的峰高比变化计算直流电(%),以 5 次 1 分钟的间隔进行评估。每种树脂密封剂都使用其制造商推荐的 LCU 和 LA 进行暴露。使用软件(GraphPad Prism 10.0.2)进行数据分析,采用方差分析,预设α值为 0.05。结果对于每种密封剂,SP-30 和 MP-10 的 DC 值都高于 LA-1。SP-30 密封剂超过了 LA-2,而 MP-10 密封剂则与 LA-2 相当。LA-3、SP-30 和 MP-10 的直流电没有差异。结论采用制造商建议的 LCU 和曝光可获得比 1 秒激光曝光更高的直流电。将激光照射时间延长至 3 秒可使直流电值相当。意义采用制造商推荐的光固化单元(LCU)和固化持续时间的结果与 LA 固化灯照射 3 秒的结果相似,但与 LA 制造商建议的 1 秒固化结果不同。对于不合作的儿童和需要缩短治疗时间的患者来说,使用 3 秒 LA 固化光的方法可能是一种合适的选择,可用于粘贴密封剂(小面积)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soft tissue management as part of peri‑implantitis treatment: When, why and how? Engineered Small Extra-Cellular Vesicles for Endogenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Recruitment and in situ Periodontal Tissue Regeneration Periodontitis Gingival Tissue Exosomes Cross and Compromise Human BBB in an In-Vitro 3D Model The Use of Phage Therapy in Reduction of Oral Cavity Bacteria: A Literature Review Will CAD/CAM Technology Increase the Effectiveness of Clinicians?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1