Design of the cross-section of a steel composite bridge taking into account the buckling check according to EN 1993-1-5

ce/papers Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1002/cepa.3065
Joseph Ndogmo, Martin Mensinger
{"title":"Design of the cross-section of a steel composite bridge taking into account the buckling check according to EN 1993-1-5","authors":"Joseph Ndogmo,&nbsp;Martin Mensinger","doi":"10.1002/cepa.3065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As part of optimizing a steel composite section to determine whether longitudinal stiffeners could be omitted concerning plate buckling, a buckling tool was developed that implements both the effective width method (EWM) and the reduced stress method (RSM). These two methods are offered in addition to the finite element method in EN 1993-1-5 for buckling analysis. It was found that when using the formula given in EN-1993-1-5 for calculating the critical buckling stress of unstiffened buckling fields, which is independent of the acting stress distribution, the ratio of the elastic critical plate buckling stress to the elastic critical column buckling stress (σ<sub>cr,p</sub>/σ<sub>cr,c</sub>) is underestimated if the compressive stress is not uniform. This affects the detection of column buckling behavior. The most economical variant resulting from the optimization, the buckling tool, the influence of shear deformations combined with plate buckling, and the column buckling behavior of unstiffened buckling fields are presented in this paper.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100223,"journal":{"name":"ce/papers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cepa.3065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ce/papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.3065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of optimizing a steel composite section to determine whether longitudinal stiffeners could be omitted concerning plate buckling, a buckling tool was developed that implements both the effective width method (EWM) and the reduced stress method (RSM). These two methods are offered in addition to the finite element method in EN 1993-1-5 for buckling analysis. It was found that when using the formula given in EN-1993-1-5 for calculating the critical buckling stress of unstiffened buckling fields, which is independent of the acting stress distribution, the ratio of the elastic critical plate buckling stress to the elastic critical column buckling stress (σcr,pcr,c) is underestimated if the compressive stress is not uniform. This affects the detection of column buckling behavior. The most economical variant resulting from the optimization, the buckling tool, the influence of shear deformations combined with plate buckling, and the column buckling behavior of unstiffened buckling fields are presented in this paper.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据 EN 1993-1-5 设计钢混结构桥梁横截面时考虑屈曲检查
在优化钢复合材料截面以确定是否可以省略纵向加强筋以避免板材屈曲的过程中,开发了一种屈曲工具,该工具采用了有效宽度法(EWM)和减小应力法(RSM)。这两种方法是 EN 1993-1-5 中用于屈曲分析的有限元方法的补充。研究发现,当使用 EN-1993-1-5 中给出的计算非刚性屈曲场临界屈曲应力的公式(该公式与作用应力分布无关)时,如果压应力不均匀,则弹性临界板屈曲应力与弹性临界柱屈曲应力之比 (σcr,p/σcr,c)会被低估。这会影响柱屈曲行为的检测。本文介绍了优化后最经济的变体、屈曲工具、剪切变形与板屈曲相结合的影响以及非刚性屈曲场的柱屈曲行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Reliability-based Allowances of Corrosion Losses for Weathering Steel Bridges Failure mode and load prediction of steel bridge girders through 3D laser scanning and machine learning methods ‘Robinson’ Pedestrian Bridge in Budapest, Hungary Cable-stayed footbridge in Lover Vítkovice Area-DOV
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1