Measures of how well a vaccine works

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q1982
Sharmistha Mishra, Christine Navarro, Jeffrey C Kwong
{"title":"Measures of how well a vaccine works","authors":"Sharmistha Mishra, Christine Navarro, Jeffrey C Kwong","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q1982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses definitions of the effect of vaccines across outcomes of interest, from individual level to contacts of vaccinated people to population level. The focus is on the outcome evaluated in an observational study on the effectiveness of mpox vaccine in the context of potential outcomes that could have been measured. When evaluating how well a vaccine works, two categories of outcomes are of interest: infection related outcomes, sometimes referred to as infection blocking effects of vaccines, and disease related outcomes, often referred to as symptomatic disease, morbidity, or mortality outcomes.1 These two categories can then be further divided to reflect those in whom the outcomes are measured: the individual who received the vaccine (direct effects), among contacts of the person who received the vaccine (indirect effects), or at population level (herd immunity).2 Direct effects of a vaccine include reducing the chances of a vaccinated individual becoming infected if exposed to the pathogen (ie, reduced susceptibility) and disease related outcomes despite acquiring infection.1 For some infectious diseases, the direct, protective effect of a vaccine against infection is the primary goal, such as with rabies, whereas for many the added downstream benefit of a …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses definitions of the effect of vaccines across outcomes of interest, from individual level to contacts of vaccinated people to population level. The focus is on the outcome evaluated in an observational study on the effectiveness of mpox vaccine in the context of potential outcomes that could have been measured. When evaluating how well a vaccine works, two categories of outcomes are of interest: infection related outcomes, sometimes referred to as infection blocking effects of vaccines, and disease related outcomes, often referred to as symptomatic disease, morbidity, or mortality outcomes.1 These two categories can then be further divided to reflect those in whom the outcomes are measured: the individual who received the vaccine (direct effects), among contacts of the person who received the vaccine (indirect effects), or at population level (herd immunity).2 Direct effects of a vaccine include reducing the chances of a vaccinated individual becoming infected if exposed to the pathogen (ie, reduced susceptibility) and disease related outcomes despite acquiring infection.1 For some infectious diseases, the direct, protective effect of a vaccine against infection is the primary goal, such as with rabies, whereas for many the added downstream benefit of a …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量疫苗效果的标准
本文讨论了从个人到接种疫苗者的接触者再到人群等各种相关结果中疫苗效果的定义。重点是在一项关于麻风腮疫苗效果的观察性研究中,结合本可测量的潜在结果对结果进行评估。在评估疫苗效果时,有两类结果值得关注:感染相关结果(有时称为疫苗的感染阻断效应)和疾病相关结果(通常称为无症状疾病、发病率或死亡率结果)。2 疫苗的直接效应包括降低接种者在接触病原体时受感染的几率(即降低易感性),以及在感染后产生的疾病相关结果。对于某些传染病来说,疫苗对感染的直接保护作用是首要目标,例如狂犬病,而对于许多传染病来说,疫苗的附加下游益处则是......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leprosy: Jordan becomes first country to eliminate disease. Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates-not false promises. Abolish NHS England and overhaul management to improve NHS productivity, says think tank. Optimising inhaled therapy for patients with asthma. Are India's regulatory gaps leaving patients with substandard mental health counsellors?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1