Increases in amyloid-β42 slow cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer’s disease trials

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae216
Jesus Abanto, Alok K Dwivedi, Bruno P Imbimbo, Alberto J Espay
{"title":"Increases in amyloid-β42 slow cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer’s disease trials","authors":"Jesus Abanto, Alok K Dwivedi, Bruno P Imbimbo, Alberto J Espay","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positive effects of new anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been attributed to brain amyloid reduction. However, most anti-Aβ antibodies also increase the CSF levels of the 42-amino acid isoform (Aβ42). We evaluated the associations of changes in CSF Aβ42 and brain Aβ-PET with cognitive and clinical end points in randomized trials of anti-Aβ drugs that lowered (β- and γ-secretase inhibitors) or increased CSF Aβ42 levels (anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies) to test the hypothesis that post-treatment increases in CSF Aβ42 levels are independently associated with cognitive and clinical outcomes. From long-term (≥12 months) randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of anti-Aβ drugs published until November 2023, we calculated the post-treatment versus baseline difference in ADAS-Cog (cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale) and CDR-SB (Clinical Dementia Rate-Sum of Boxes) and z-standardized changes in CSF Aβ42 and Aβ-PET Centiloids (CL). We estimated the effect size [regression coefficients (RCs) and confidence intervals (CIs)] and the heterogeneity (I2) of the associations between AD biomarkers and cognitive and clinical end points using random-effects meta-regression models. We included 25 966 subjects with AD from 24 trials. In random-effects analysis, increases in CSF Aβ42 were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: −0.55; 95% CI: −0.89, −0.21, P = 0.003, I2 = 61.4%) and CDR-SB (RC: −0.16; 95% CI: −0.26, −0.06, P = 0.002, I2 = 34.5%). Similarly, decreases in Aβ–PET were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.89, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and CDR-SB (RC: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.33, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Higher CSF Aβ42 levels after exposure to anti-Aβ drugs are independently associated with slowing cognitive impairment and clinical decline. Increases in Aβ42 may represent a mechanism of potential benefit of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies in AD.","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive effects of new anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been attributed to brain amyloid reduction. However, most anti-Aβ antibodies also increase the CSF levels of the 42-amino acid isoform (Aβ42). We evaluated the associations of changes in CSF Aβ42 and brain Aβ-PET with cognitive and clinical end points in randomized trials of anti-Aβ drugs that lowered (β- and γ-secretase inhibitors) or increased CSF Aβ42 levels (anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies) to test the hypothesis that post-treatment increases in CSF Aβ42 levels are independently associated with cognitive and clinical outcomes. From long-term (≥12 months) randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of anti-Aβ drugs published until November 2023, we calculated the post-treatment versus baseline difference in ADAS-Cog (cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale) and CDR-SB (Clinical Dementia Rate-Sum of Boxes) and z-standardized changes in CSF Aβ42 and Aβ-PET Centiloids (CL). We estimated the effect size [regression coefficients (RCs) and confidence intervals (CIs)] and the heterogeneity (I2) of the associations between AD biomarkers and cognitive and clinical end points using random-effects meta-regression models. We included 25 966 subjects with AD from 24 trials. In random-effects analysis, increases in CSF Aβ42 were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: −0.55; 95% CI: −0.89, −0.21, P = 0.003, I2 = 61.4%) and CDR-SB (RC: −0.16; 95% CI: −0.26, −0.06, P = 0.002, I2 = 34.5%). Similarly, decreases in Aβ–PET were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.89, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and CDR-SB (RC: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.33, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Higher CSF Aβ42 levels after exposure to anti-Aβ drugs are independently associated with slowing cognitive impairment and clinical decline. Increases in Aβ42 may represent a mechanism of potential benefit of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies in AD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿尔茨海默病试验中,淀粉样蛋白-β42的增加可减缓认知和临床衰退
新型抗淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ)单克隆抗体对阿尔茨海默病(AD)的积极作用归因于脑淀粉样蛋白的减少。然而,大多数抗 Aβ 抗体也会增加脑脊液中 42 氨基酸异构体(Aβ42)的水平。在降低(β-和γ-分泌酶抑制剂)或增加 CSF Aβ42 水平(抗 Aβ 单克隆抗体)的抗 Aβ 药物随机试验中,我们评估了 CSF Aβ42 和脑 Aβ-PET 的变化与认知和临床终点的相关性,以验证治疗后 CSF Aβ42 水平的增加与认知和临床结果独立相关的假设。从截至 2023 年 11 月发表的抗 Aβ 药物的长期(≥12 个月)随机安慰剂对照临床试验中,我们计算了治疗后与基线相比,ADAS-Cog(阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表)和 CDR-SB(临床痴呆率-方框总和)的差异,以及 CSF Aβ42 和 Aβ-PET Centiloids (CL) 的 z 标准化变化。我们使用随机效应元回归模型估算了AD生物标志物与认知和临床终点之间的效应大小[回归系数(RC)和置信区间(CI)]和异质性(I2)。我们纳入了 24 项试验中的 25 966 例 AD 受试者。在随机效应分析中,CSF Aβ42的增加与ADAS-Cog(RC:-0.55;95% CI:-0.89,-0.21,P = 0.003,I2 = 61.4%)和CDR-SB(RC:-0.16;95% CI:-0.26,-0.06,P = 0.002,I2 = 34.5%)的下降速度减慢有关。同样,Aβ-PET的下降与ADAS-Cog(RC:0.69;95% CI:0.48,0.89,P &P;lt;0.001,I2 = 0%)和CDR-SB(RC:0.26;95% CI:0.18,0.33,P &P;lt;0.001,I2 = 0%)的下降速度减慢有关。敏感性分析得出了相似的结果。暴露于抗Aβ药物后较高的脑脊液Aβ42水平与认知功能损害和临床衰退的减缓有独立关联。Aβ42的增加可能代表了抗Aβ单克隆抗体在AD中的潜在获益机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Biallelic EPB41L3 variants underlie a developmental disorder with seizures and myelination defects Decision cost hypersensitivity underlies Huntington’s disease apathy Correction to: Expanded clinical phenotype spectrum correlates with variant function in SCN2A-related disorders. Inside out: the neural basis of spontaneous and creative thinking Increases in amyloid-β42 slow cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer’s disease trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1