Cumulative collision risk and population-level consequences of industrial wind-power plant development for two vulture species: A quantitative warning

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107669
{"title":"Cumulative collision risk and population-level consequences of industrial wind-power plant development for two vulture species: A quantitative warning","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prioritizing renewable energy generation over the conservation of natural habitats and species on a large spatial scale, leads to the paradox of impacting biodiversity to mitigate climate change. In this study, we aim at quantifying the long-term demographic impact of the excess mortality caused by collisions with wind turbines on the populations of two vulture species of conservation concern. Using long-term monitoring data and Integrated Population Models (IPMs), we quantified demographic parameters and projected population trends under various wind power development scenarios. Our findings indicate that even under our most optimistic scenarios, annual collision mortality could reach up to 30 % of the current Cinereous vulture population and 7 % of the Griffon vulture population. Without further wind power expansion, both vulture populations are predicted to remain stable or increase over the next 20 years. However, the addition of 85 wind turbines is likely to drive the Cinereous vulture to local extinction within 18 years and significantly slow the growth of the Griffon vulture population. Scenarios involving larger numbers of turbines could result in the extinction of both species within two to five years for Cinereous vultures and up to 20 years for Griffon vultures, depending on space use intensity. Our results underscore the vulnerability of long-lived species to excess mortality and highlight the need for comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) that incorporate population dynamics analyses. Effective conservation strategies must include rigorous pre- and post-construction monitoring, the availability of monitoring data, and cumulative impact assessments that consider the entire foraging range of these species. Additionally, strategic planning to avoid critical vulture habitats and implementing mitigation measures in buffer zones are essential. This study emphasizes the necessity of integrating biodiversity considerations into renewable energy planning to balance the goals of energy production and wildlife conservation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prioritizing renewable energy generation over the conservation of natural habitats and species on a large spatial scale, leads to the paradox of impacting biodiversity to mitigate climate change. In this study, we aim at quantifying the long-term demographic impact of the excess mortality caused by collisions with wind turbines on the populations of two vulture species of conservation concern. Using long-term monitoring data and Integrated Population Models (IPMs), we quantified demographic parameters and projected population trends under various wind power development scenarios. Our findings indicate that even under our most optimistic scenarios, annual collision mortality could reach up to 30 % of the current Cinereous vulture population and 7 % of the Griffon vulture population. Without further wind power expansion, both vulture populations are predicted to remain stable or increase over the next 20 years. However, the addition of 85 wind turbines is likely to drive the Cinereous vulture to local extinction within 18 years and significantly slow the growth of the Griffon vulture population. Scenarios involving larger numbers of turbines could result in the extinction of both species within two to five years for Cinereous vultures and up to 20 years for Griffon vultures, depending on space use intensity. Our results underscore the vulnerability of long-lived species to excess mortality and highlight the need for comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) that incorporate population dynamics analyses. Effective conservation strategies must include rigorous pre- and post-construction monitoring, the availability of monitoring data, and cumulative impact assessments that consider the entire foraging range of these species. Additionally, strategic planning to avoid critical vulture habitats and implementing mitigation measures in buffer zones are essential. This study emphasizes the necessity of integrating biodiversity considerations into renewable energy planning to balance the goals of energy production and wildlife conservation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业风力发电厂开发对两种秃鹫的累积碰撞风险和种群水平后果:定量预警
在大空间范围内,优先考虑可再生能源发电而不是保护自然栖息地和物种,会导致影响生物多样性以减缓气候变化的矛盾。在这项研究中,我们旨在量化与风力涡轮机碰撞造成的超额死亡率对两种受保护秃鹫种群的长期人口影响。利用长期监测数据和综合种群模型(IPMs),我们量化了人口统计参数,并预测了各种风电发展情景下的种群趋势。我们的研究结果表明,即使在最乐观的情况下,每年的碰撞死亡率也可能高达目前秃鹫种群的 30% 和狮鹫种群的 7%。如果不进一步扩大风力发电,预计这两种秃鹫的数量在未来 20 年内将保持稳定或增加。然而,增加 85 台风力涡轮机可能会在 18 年内导致秃鹫在当地灭绝,并显著减缓狮鹫种群的增长速度。根据空间使用强度的不同,涉及更多涡轮机的方案可能会导致两种秃鹫在 2 到 5 年内灭绝,狮鹫在 20 年内灭绝。我们的研究结果凸显了长寿物种易受过量死亡影响的脆弱性,并强调了综合环境影响评估(EIA)的必要性,其中包括种群动态分析。有效的保护策略必须包括严格的施工前后监测、监测数据的可用性以及考虑这些物种整个觅食范围的累积影响评估。此外,避开重要秃鹫栖息地的战略规划以及在缓冲区内实施缓解措施也至关重要。本研究强调了将生物多样性因素纳入可再生能源规划的必要性,以平衡能源生产和野生动物保护的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Solastalgia and public environment-friendly behaviors in the urbanization context Environmental assessment of cenosphere and GGBFS-based geopolymers: A path to greener construction materials Interactive and dynamic insights into environmental impacts of a neighborhood: A tight coupling of multi-agent system and dynamic life cycle assessment Multilevel analysis of land reallocation and carbon emissions through food trade Structural evolution of CO2 emissions outsourcing within the global ICT multinational investment network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1