Emotions as antecedents of sustainable travel behaviour

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100903
Christian Bretter , Kate Pangbourne
{"title":"Emotions as antecedents of sustainable travel behaviour","authors":"Christian Bretter ,&nbsp;Kate Pangbourne","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Promoting the use of sustainable transport alternatives is critical for reducing carbon emissions. In this paper, we propose a cognitive mechanism that explains the extent to which individuals use different sustainable travel modes (e.g., the bus, train, bicycle, and car-sharing). Specifically, we hypothesise negative emotions related to cars as an antecedent of sustainable travel mode use where emotions such as shame, sadness, and upset are positively associated with the extent to which individuals use sustainable transport modes. These negative emotions are further hypothesised to mediate the effect of car attitudes on sustainable travel mode use. Using a broadly representative sample of the UK population (N = 1294), we test these hypotheses and find, firstly, that car attitudes are negatively associated with the use of all sustainable travel modes. Secondly, we demonstrate that negative emotions related to cars mediate this effect. In other words, negative emotions – and not car attitudes – are (positively) associated with the extent to which individuals use all sustainable travel modes. The more individuals perceive the car as something ‘good’, the less they experience emotions such as shame, sadness, and upset when thinking about cars; and it is these negative emotions that then drive sustainable travel mode use. Our study reveals that emotions can and should also be understood as antecedents of sustainable travel modes. We then discuss implications for practitioners and further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100903"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001662/pdfft?md5=c328d047cf7f92c7b0fedc6ce7cdfb75&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24001662-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Promoting the use of sustainable transport alternatives is critical for reducing carbon emissions. In this paper, we propose a cognitive mechanism that explains the extent to which individuals use different sustainable travel modes (e.g., the bus, train, bicycle, and car-sharing). Specifically, we hypothesise negative emotions related to cars as an antecedent of sustainable travel mode use where emotions such as shame, sadness, and upset are positively associated with the extent to which individuals use sustainable transport modes. These negative emotions are further hypothesised to mediate the effect of car attitudes on sustainable travel mode use. Using a broadly representative sample of the UK population (N = 1294), we test these hypotheses and find, firstly, that car attitudes are negatively associated with the use of all sustainable travel modes. Secondly, we demonstrate that negative emotions related to cars mediate this effect. In other words, negative emotions – and not car attitudes – are (positively) associated with the extent to which individuals use all sustainable travel modes. The more individuals perceive the car as something ‘good’, the less they experience emotions such as shame, sadness, and upset when thinking about cars; and it is these negative emotions that then drive sustainable travel mode use. Our study reveals that emotions can and should also be understood as antecedents of sustainable travel modes. We then discuss implications for practitioners and further research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感是可持续旅行行为的先决条件
推广使用可持续交通方式对于减少碳排放至关重要。在本文中,我们提出了一种认知机制来解释个人使用不同可持续出行方式(如公共汽车、火车、自行车和汽车共享)的程度。具体来说,我们假设与汽车相关的负面情绪是使用可持续出行方式的前因,其中羞愧、悲伤和不安等情绪与个人使用可持续交通方式的程度呈正相关。这些负面情绪还被进一步假设为汽车态度对可持续出行方式使用的中介效应。我们使用具有广泛代表性的英国人口样本(N = 1294)对这些假设进行了检验,结果发现:首先,汽车态度与所有可持续出行方式的使用呈负相关。其次,我们证明了与汽车相关的负面情绪对这一效应的调节作用。换句话说,负面情绪(而非汽车态度)与个人使用所有可持续出行方式的程度(正相关)。个人越是认为汽车是 "好 "的东西,他们在想到汽车时就越少产生羞愧、悲伤和不安等情绪;而正是这些负面情绪推动了可持续出行方式的使用。我们的研究表明,情绪也可以而且应该被理解为可持续出行方式的先决条件。随后,我们将讨论对从业人员和进一步研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Analysing driver behaviour and crash frequency at railway level crossings using connected vehicle and GIS data An injury severity-based methodology for assessing priority areas for shared micromobility accident risk mitigation Improving conventional transit services with modular autonomous vehicles: A bi-level programming approach Does car dependence make people unsatisfied with Life? Evidence from a U.S. National survey Ownership and use of electric vehicles in the Washington, DC, metro area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1