Reviewing the evidence on riparian community engagement: A conceptual framework of community-based river management

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103887
Pere Vall-Casas , Alba Juárez-Bourke , Xavier Garcia-Acosta , Marta Benages-Albert , Marie-Anne Germaine
{"title":"Reviewing the evidence on riparian community engagement: A conceptual framework of community-based river management","authors":"Pere Vall-Casas ,&nbsp;Alba Juárez-Bourke ,&nbsp;Xavier Garcia-Acosta ,&nbsp;Marta Benages-Albert ,&nbsp;Marie-Anne Germaine","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Community engagement is crucial for integrated and adaptive river management but an organized body of knowledge to systematically promote community engagement is still lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To provide a conceptual framework of community-based river management, and to identify and synthesize evidence that describes pathways conducive to community engagement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We carried out a systematic review of empirical evidence on community engagement in river management published from January 2000 to May 2021. By means of iterative categorization, we described three variables across all case studies: governance context, values of mobilization and pathways to engagement. A conceptual framework of community-based river management was drawn up and evidence of each pathway synthetized.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 153 records, 51 were eligible. Three types of governance context were observed: top-down, bottom-up and hybrid. Environmental, economic, safety, scenic, cultural and social values were found to bring people together for action. Community mobilization was mostly driven by multiple values, with a prevailing perception of the river as a complex eco-social system. Seven pathways to community engagement were identified: assessing community perception, knowledge co-production, community science, common vision building, environmental education, community-based groups and pro-environmental action. We proposed a novel conceptual framework that visually represents community-based river management, informed by the interplay between values, governance and these pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Disregarding location and scale, community-based river management is multi-faceted and dynamic. Our conceptual framework provides a baseline for systematically engaging local communities in the different stages of river management, including diagnosis and monitoring, decision-making and implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 103887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Community engagement is crucial for integrated and adaptive river management but an organized body of knowledge to systematically promote community engagement is still lacking.

Objectives

To provide a conceptual framework of community-based river management, and to identify and synthesize evidence that describes pathways conducive to community engagement.

Methods

We carried out a systematic review of empirical evidence on community engagement in river management published from January 2000 to May 2021. By means of iterative categorization, we described three variables across all case studies: governance context, values of mobilization and pathways to engagement. A conceptual framework of community-based river management was drawn up and evidence of each pathway synthetized.

Results

Of 153 records, 51 were eligible. Three types of governance context were observed: top-down, bottom-up and hybrid. Environmental, economic, safety, scenic, cultural and social values were found to bring people together for action. Community mobilization was mostly driven by multiple values, with a prevailing perception of the river as a complex eco-social system. Seven pathways to community engagement were identified: assessing community perception, knowledge co-production, community science, common vision building, environmental education, community-based groups and pro-environmental action. We proposed a novel conceptual framework that visually represents community-based river management, informed by the interplay between values, governance and these pathways.

Conclusion

Disregarding location and scale, community-based river management is multi-faceted and dynamic. Our conceptual framework provides a baseline for systematically engaging local communities in the different stages of river management, including diagnosis and monitoring, decision-making and implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾河岸社区参与的证据:基于社区的河流管理概念框架
背景社区参与对于综合和适应性河流管理至关重要,但目前仍缺乏一个有组织的知识体系来系统性地促进社区参与。目标提供一个基于社区的河流管理概念框架,并识别和综合描述有利于社区参与的途径的证据。方法我们对 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月间发表的有关社区参与河流管理的实证证据进行了系统性回顾。通过反复分类,我们对所有案例研究中的三个变量进行了描述:治理背景、动员价值和参与途径。结果 在 153 条记录中,有 51 条符合条件。观察到三种类型的治理环境:自上而下、自下而上和混合型。人们发现,环境、经济、安全、风景、文化和社会价值促使人们共同采取行动。社区动员主要由多重价值观驱动,人们普遍认为河流是一个复杂的生态-社会系统。我们确定了社区参与的七种途径:评估社区认知、知识共同生产、社区科学、共同愿景建设、环境教育、社区团体和亲环境行动。我们提出了一个新颖的概念框架,以价值观、治理和这些途径之间的相互作用为基础,直观地体现了以社区为基础的河流管理。我们的概念框架为当地社区系统地参与河流管理的不同阶段(包括诊断和监测、决策和实施)提供了基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Forest owners’ perceptions of machine learning: Insights from swedish forestry Understanding how landscape value and climate risk discourses can improve adaptation planning: Insights from Q-method Articulating futures: Community storylines and assisted ecosystem adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef Insights into the public engagement of coastal geoscientists Flood data platform governance: Identifying the technological and socio-technical approach(es) differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1