Altruistic and egoistic behaviors on enterprise social network platforms: Analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114939
Zhonghua Sheng , Jindi Fu , Anand Jeyaraj , Yuan Sun
{"title":"Altruistic and egoistic behaviors on enterprise social network platforms: Analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA","authors":"Zhonghua Sheng ,&nbsp;Jindi Fu ,&nbsp;Anand Jeyaraj ,&nbsp;Yuan Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enterprise social network platforms (ESNPs) are thriving in workplaces. Past studies have provided two competitive explanations − employees engage in egoistic behaviors to facilitate knowledge hiding and personal enjoyment or altruistic behaviors to facilitate knowledge sharing and offering assistance. However, these perspectives have generally not been synthesized into a unified model. We adopt an integrated perspective to reconcile the two paradoxical behaviors, using PLS-SEM and fsQCA from 174 employees. The results of PLS-SEM show that social and utilitarian motivation facilitate altruistic use, while social motivation reduces egoistic use, and utilitarian motivation and egoistic use have an inverted U-shaped relationship. Institutional deterrence positively moderates the relationship between egoistic use and work performance. Altruistic use mediates the relationship between three motivations and work performance. The fsQCA reveals causal configurations that portray the recipes of how different modes promote altruistic use, egoistic use, and work performance, which are complementary to the findings of PLS-SEM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114939"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enterprise social network platforms (ESNPs) are thriving in workplaces. Past studies have provided two competitive explanations − employees engage in egoistic behaviors to facilitate knowledge hiding and personal enjoyment or altruistic behaviors to facilitate knowledge sharing and offering assistance. However, these perspectives have generally not been synthesized into a unified model. We adopt an integrated perspective to reconcile the two paradoxical behaviors, using PLS-SEM and fsQCA from 174 employees. The results of PLS-SEM show that social and utilitarian motivation facilitate altruistic use, while social motivation reduces egoistic use, and utilitarian motivation and egoistic use have an inverted U-shaped relationship. Institutional deterrence positively moderates the relationship between egoistic use and work performance. Altruistic use mediates the relationship between three motivations and work performance. The fsQCA reveals causal configurations that portray the recipes of how different modes promote altruistic use, egoistic use, and work performance, which are complementary to the findings of PLS-SEM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社交网络平台上的利他主义和利己主义行为:利用 PLS-SEM 和 fsQCA 进行分析
企业社交网络平台(ESNPs)正在工作场所蓬勃发展。过去的研究提供了两种有竞争力的解释--员工参与利己主义行为以促进知识隐藏和个人享受,或参与利他主义行为以促进知识共享和提供帮助。然而,这些观点一般都没有综合成一个统一的模型。我们采用了一种综合视角,利用 PLS-SEM 和来自 174 名员工的 fsQCA 来调和这两种自相矛盾的行为。PLS-SEM 的结果表明,社会性动机和功利性动机会促进利他主义使用,而社会性动机会减少利己主义使用,功利性动机和利己主义使用呈倒 U 型关系。制度威慑正向调节利己主义使用与工作绩效之间的关系。利他主义使用在三种动机与工作绩效之间起到中介作用。fsQCA揭示了不同模式如何促进利他主义使用、利己主义使用和工作绩效的因果配置,这与PLS-SEM的结论相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1