Cleaning practices of transport vehicles by commercial and non-commercial livestock markets users in Scotland

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Research in veterinary science Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105413
Rebecca Allen , Lisa A. Boden , Ian Hutchinson , Julie Stirling , Thibaud Porphyre
{"title":"Cleaning practices of transport vehicles by commercial and non-commercial livestock markets users in Scotland","authors":"Rebecca Allen ,&nbsp;Lisa A. Boden ,&nbsp;Ian Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Julie Stirling ,&nbsp;Thibaud Porphyre","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Livestock markets are critical intermediaries in the movement of cattle and sheep between herds and to abattoirs. Disease prevention strategies promoting Cleansing &amp; Disinfection (C&amp;D) of vehicles moving animals from markets are in place in Scotland to reduce the risk of widespread transmission of pathogens within the livestock industry. However, little is known about how market users implement C&amp;D on their vehicles and how these may differ between sectors of the industry.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online questionnaire was completed by 72 Scottish market users to investigate C&amp;D practices on livestock transport vehicles. Respondents were grouped based on their farming activities and biosecurity practices were compared between commercial and non-commercial users.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed a lower-than-expected use of brush or disinfectant and a shorter-than-expected time spent on C&amp;D. Particularly, 43.6 % of respondents spent less than 30 min to C&amp;D their vehicle, with no significant differences between respondents from commercial and non-commercial sectors (<em>P</em> = 0.75). Overall, we found little differences in C&amp;D practices and level of training between sectors, highlighting the industrywide deficit in biosecurity knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results highlight a need to improve the messaging and awareness on good C&amp;D practices on transport vehicles. Regular training on C&amp;D practices is recommended, particularly for commercial livestock transport.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002807/pdfft?md5=575eb1cc626634b997326fad7cd45abd&pid=1-s2.0-S0034528824002807-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Livestock markets are critical intermediaries in the movement of cattle and sheep between herds and to abattoirs. Disease prevention strategies promoting Cleansing & Disinfection (C&D) of vehicles moving animals from markets are in place in Scotland to reduce the risk of widespread transmission of pathogens within the livestock industry. However, little is known about how market users implement C&D on their vehicles and how these may differ between sectors of the industry.

Methods

An online questionnaire was completed by 72 Scottish market users to investigate C&D practices on livestock transport vehicles. Respondents were grouped based on their farming activities and biosecurity practices were compared between commercial and non-commercial users.

Results

The results showed a lower-than-expected use of brush or disinfectant and a shorter-than-expected time spent on C&D. Particularly, 43.6 % of respondents spent less than 30 min to C&D their vehicle, with no significant differences between respondents from commercial and non-commercial sectors (P = 0.75). Overall, we found little differences in C&D practices and level of training between sectors, highlighting the industrywide deficit in biosecurity knowledge.

Conclusions

These results highlight a need to improve the messaging and awareness on good C&D practices on transport vehicles. Regular training on C&D practices is recommended, particularly for commercial livestock transport.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰商业和非商业牲畜市场用户清洁运输车辆的做法
背景牲畜市场是牛羊在畜群之间流动并运往屠宰场的重要中介。苏格兰实施了疾病预防战略,提倡对从市场运出牲畜的车辆进行清洁和消毒 (C&D),以降低病原体在畜牧业内广泛传播的风险。72 名苏格兰市场用户填写了一份在线问卷,调查牲畜运输车辆的清洁和消毒做法。结果表明,刷子或消毒剂的使用率低于预期,C&D 所花费的时间也低于预期。特别是,43.6% 的受访者用于车辆清洁和消毒的时间少于 30 分钟,商业和非商业受访者之间没有明显差异(P = 0.75)。总体而言,我们发现不同行业的 C&D 实践和培训水平差异不大,这凸显了整个行业在生物安全知识方面的不足。建议定期开展 C&D 实践培训,特别是针对商业牲畜运输。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Development of point-of-care immunodiagnostic test for Taenia solium cysticercosis in pigs. Effects of Bacillus coagulans on kidney injury caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in rabbits. Investigation of surfactant apoproteins and Brucella sp. antigens in the lungs of aborted bovine fetuses and neonatal calves delivered weak Incidence of puerperal metritis and associated risk factors in dairy cows in Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia Treatment modalities for claw horn lesions and their effects on locomotion scores, gait properties, lesion progression, and nociceptive threshold in dairy cows: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1