Avian community responses to energy development and woody encroachment

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110776
{"title":"Avian community responses to energy development and woody encroachment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stressors affecting ecosystems can simultaneously impact ecological communities. Energy development and woody encroachment are two stressors that often occur concurrently but are rarely investigated together. We investigated changes in grassland and shrubland bird abundance in response to oil and gas development and woody plant cover in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas in the south-central United States, an area that has experienced intensive oil and gas development in the 21st century. We used a multi-species distance sampling model to estimate abundance and community-level effects of energy development. We estimated both the magnitude and spatial scale of effect of each covariate on the grassland and shrubland bird community simultaneously within the same modeling framework. Oil and gas well pads had negative effects on all species abundances and these effects extended no greater than 1–2 km into the landscape. Oil and gas pipelines, however, had universally positive effects that extended up to 6 km into the landscape, likely because of ground cover management associated with installing and maintaining pipelines. The effect of woody cover was variable among species and extended 1–4 km into the landscape. Woody effects on individual species also varied among ecoregions, although this was likely a consequence of low woody density in some ecoregions. The varying spatial scales at which energy development and woody cover influenced abundance suggests that stressors are impacting different biological processes. Our results indicate that ecoregion-specific monitoring and inference is needed to accurately predict the impacts of environmental stressors on ecological communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724003380","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stressors affecting ecosystems can simultaneously impact ecological communities. Energy development and woody encroachment are two stressors that often occur concurrently but are rarely investigated together. We investigated changes in grassland and shrubland bird abundance in response to oil and gas development and woody plant cover in the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas in the south-central United States, an area that has experienced intensive oil and gas development in the 21st century. We used a multi-species distance sampling model to estimate abundance and community-level effects of energy development. We estimated both the magnitude and spatial scale of effect of each covariate on the grassland and shrubland bird community simultaneously within the same modeling framework. Oil and gas well pads had negative effects on all species abundances and these effects extended no greater than 1–2 km into the landscape. Oil and gas pipelines, however, had universally positive effects that extended up to 6 km into the landscape, likely because of ground cover management associated with installing and maintaining pipelines. The effect of woody cover was variable among species and extended 1–4 km into the landscape. Woody effects on individual species also varied among ecoregions, although this was likely a consequence of low woody density in some ecoregions. The varying spatial scales at which energy development and woody cover influenced abundance suggests that stressors are impacting different biological processes. Our results indicate that ecoregion-specific monitoring and inference is needed to accurately predict the impacts of environmental stressors on ecological communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸟类群落对能源开发和林木侵蚀的反应
影响生态系统的压力可同时影响生态群落。能源开发和林木侵蚀是经常同时出现的两种压力源,但很少同时进行研究。我们调查了美国中南部德克萨斯州鹰福特页岩地区草地和灌木林鸟类丰度随油气开发和木本植物覆盖率变化的情况,该地区在 21 世纪经历了密集的油气开发。我们使用多物种距离采样模型来估计能源开发对丰度和群落水平的影响。我们在同一建模框架内同时估算了每个协变量对草地和灌木地鸟类群落的影响程度和空间尺度。油气井垫对所有物种的丰度都有负面影响,而且这些影响的范围不超过 1-2 km。然而,石油和天然气管道对所有物种的丰度都有正面影响,影响范围最远可达 6 公里,这可能是因为安装和维护管道时进行了地面植被管理。木质植被对不同物种的影响各不相同,其影响范围延伸至地表 1-4 公里处。木质植被对单个物种的影响也因生态区而异,尽管这可能是由于某些生态区的木质植被密度较低造成的。能源开发和林木覆盖影响丰度的不同空间尺度表明,压力因素正在影响不同的生物过程。我们的研究结果表明,要准确预测环境压力因素对生态群落的影响,需要针对生态区域进行监测和推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Conservation benefits of marine reserves depend on knowledge integration of genotypic and phenotypic diversity Conserving genetic diversity hotspots under climate change: Are protected areas helpful? Reply to Thornton and Murray: Models for Canada lynx conservation planning require nuance The Antarctic Specially Protected Species conservation management tool: Development, use and future outlook A global review of landscape-scale analyses in bats reveals geographic and taxonomic biases and opportunities for novel research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1