Can government-led urban expansion simultaneously alleviate pollution and carbon emissions? Staggered difference-in-differences evidence from Chinese firms

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.012
Qianlin Hu, Razia Mijit, Jingxuan Xu, Shan Miao
{"title":"Can government-led urban expansion simultaneously alleviate pollution and carbon emissions? Staggered difference-in-differences evidence from Chinese firms","authors":"Qianlin Hu,&nbsp;Razia Mijit,&nbsp;Jingxuan Xu,&nbsp;Shan Miao","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The outward expansion of city centers is a typical feature of rapid urbanization in developing countries, leading to complex environmental pollution effects due to evolving urban spatial patterns. This study examines the impact of government-led urban expansion on pollution and carbon emissions by firms, utilizing firm and city-level data. Employing the staggered difference-in-differences (DID) method and taking the county-to-district conversion (CDC) as a quasi-natural experiment, the study finds that CDC reduced SO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 80.95% and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 13.12%. The key to this synergistic emission reduction lies in a series of source control strategies, including enhancing energy efficiency and innovation, industrial restructuring, and production reduction. Furthermore, the study reveals that CDC has a more significant effect on emission reduction for NOEs and small firms. Additionally, large cities, cities with high fiscal self-sufficiency, and cities with high per capita GDP exhibit greater environmental regulatory strength, leading to more effective emissions reduction. This paper seeks to explore potential gaps in research on the environmental impacts of government-led urban expansion, and it may provide empirical support for relevant policies in developing countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outward expansion of city centers is a typical feature of rapid urbanization in developing countries, leading to complex environmental pollution effects due to evolving urban spatial patterns. This study examines the impact of government-led urban expansion on pollution and carbon emissions by firms, utilizing firm and city-level data. Employing the staggered difference-in-differences (DID) method and taking the county-to-district conversion (CDC) as a quasi-natural experiment, the study finds that CDC reduced SO2 emissions by 80.95% and CO2 emissions by 13.12%. The key to this synergistic emission reduction lies in a series of source control strategies, including enhancing energy efficiency and innovation, industrial restructuring, and production reduction. Furthermore, the study reveals that CDC has a more significant effect on emission reduction for NOEs and small firms. Additionally, large cities, cities with high fiscal self-sufficiency, and cities with high per capita GDP exhibit greater environmental regulatory strength, leading to more effective emissions reduction. This paper seeks to explore potential gaps in research on the environmental impacts of government-led urban expansion, and it may provide empirical support for relevant policies in developing countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府主导的城市扩张能否同时缓解污染和碳排放?来自中国企业的交错差分证据
城市中心向外扩张是发展中国家快速城市化的一个典型特征,不断演变的城市空间格局导致了复杂的环境污染效应。本研究利用企业和城市层面的数据,考察了政府主导的城市扩张对企业污染和碳排放的影响。研究采用交错差分法(DID),将县改区(CDC)作为准自然实验,发现县改区减少了 80.95% 的二氧化硫排放和 13.12% 的二氧化碳排放。协同减排的关键在于一系列源头控制策略,包括提高能效和创新、产业结构调整和减产。此外,研究还发现,对于 NOE 和小型企业而言,CDC 对减排的影响更为显著。此外,大城市、财政自给率高的城市和人均 GDP 高的城市表现出更大的环境监管力度,从而实现更有效的减排。本文旨在探索政府主导的城市扩张对环境影响的潜在研究空白,并为发展中国家的相关政策提供经验支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
How does macroprudential policy affect the relationship between financial openness and bank risk-taking Employee stock ownership plans and controlling shareholders’ over-appointing of directors The economic implications of population aging on current account balance Can linguistic big data empower digital economy?: Evidence from China Return-to-hometown entrepreneurship and employment of low-income households: Evidence from national returned entrepreneurial enterprise data of China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1