Has China's Carbon Emissions Trading Policy Induced Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction in the Power Sector?

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3450523
Wei Shi;Yue-Jun Zhang;Jing-Yue Liu
{"title":"Has China's Carbon Emissions Trading Policy Induced Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction in the Power Sector?","authors":"Wei Shi;Yue-Jun Zhang;Jing-Yue Liu","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3450523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy is a major market-oriented environmental policy that promotes energy conservation and emissions reduction. However, it is still in the initial stage of development, and its effectiveness is still highly controversial. Therefore, this article employs the difference-in-differences and event study methods to determine whether China's CET policy can promote energy conservation and emissions reduction in the power sector based on a comprehensive dataset containing power enterprise, power sectoral, and provincial data from 2005 to 2021. The results indicate that China's CET policy has significantly reduced CO\n<sub>2</sub>\n emissions in the power sector by 12.4% during the sample period, but it has no significant effect on energy conservation; in addition, China's CET policy has not exerted an expectation effect on energy conservation and emissions reduction in the power sector but has a three-year lag effect; finally, investing in renewable power generation has become the primary measure for power sector to respond to CET regulations.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"14326-14338"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10652894/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy is a major market-oriented environmental policy that promotes energy conservation and emissions reduction. However, it is still in the initial stage of development, and its effectiveness is still highly controversial. Therefore, this article employs the difference-in-differences and event study methods to determine whether China's CET policy can promote energy conservation and emissions reduction in the power sector based on a comprehensive dataset containing power enterprise, power sectoral, and provincial data from 2005 to 2021. The results indicate that China's CET policy has significantly reduced CO 2 emissions in the power sector by 12.4% during the sample period, but it has no significant effect on energy conservation; in addition, China's CET policy has not exerted an expectation effect on energy conservation and emissions reduction in the power sector but has a three-year lag effect; finally, investing in renewable power generation has become the primary measure for power sector to respond to CET regulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国的碳排放交易政策是否促进了电力行业的节能减排?
中国的碳排放权交易(CET)政策是一项以市场为导向、促进节能减排的重要环境政策。然而,该政策仍处于发展的初级阶段,其有效性仍存在很大争议。因此,本文采用差分法和事件研究法,基于 2005 年至 2021 年电力企业、电力部门和省级数据的综合数据集,探讨中国的 CET 政策能否促进电力行业的节能减排。结果表明,在样本期内,中国的 CET 政策使电力行业的二氧化碳排放量大幅减少了 12.4%,但对节能减排没有显著影响;此外,中国的 CET 政策对电力行业的节能减排没有产生预期效应,而是产生了三年的滞后效应;最后,投资可再生能源发电成为电力行业应对 CET 法规的主要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
“Design-Led Agility: Unraveling the Influence of Design Thinking in the Agile Methodology Journey by User Experience Designers” Every Coin Has Two Sides: Enterprise Digital Transformation and Symbolic Innovation Prediction of Technology Convergence on the Basis of Supernetwork Default Identification of Scientific Crowdfunding Projects: A Hesitant Fuzzy Deep Learning Approach Data-Driven Identification of Industrial Clusters: A Patent Analysis Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1