Attitudes and Behaviours Regarding COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies in Australians With an Underlying Health Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1111/hex.70025
Sze-Ee Soh, Darshini Ayton, Amelia Bevins, Helen Skouteris, Mallory Trent, Raina MacIntyre
{"title":"Attitudes and Behaviours Regarding COVID-19 Mitigation Strategies in Australians With an Underlying Health Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Sze-Ee Soh,&nbsp;Darshini Ayton,&nbsp;Amelia Bevins,&nbsp;Helen Skouteris,&nbsp;Mallory Trent,&nbsp;Raina MacIntyre","doi":"10.1111/hex.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Public health strategies have focused on preventing and slowing the transmission of COVID-19 by promoting the uptake of mitigation strategies. However, little is known about the uptake of these strategies in the presence of underlying health conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the attitudes and behaviours of a sample of Australians towards COVID-19 mitigation strategies, and determine if uptake of these strategies differed across different health conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>National survey of Australian residents over 18 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>A purpose-built survey was used to collect participants' attitudes and behaviours towards COVID-19 mitigation strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Over half (53%) of the 2867 participants (99% completion rate) reported having one or more comorbidities. The most commonly self-reported health condition was cardiometabolic conditions (28%). Most participants disagreed that masks were no longer needed (74%) and wanted the 5-day isolation mandate (66%). More than one-third would like masks to be mandated for indoor spaces (38%) and 25% avoided going to hospitals. Participants with allergies (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14, 1.65), cardiometabolic (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.23, 1.79), respiratory (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.07, 1.62) and neurological (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.12, 2.32) conditions were more likely to avoid using public transport compared to those without. In contrast, participants with underlying mental health conditions were less likely to use N95/P2 facemasks in public spaces (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25, 0.87) compared to those without.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A substantial proportion of Australians continued to adopt COVID-19 mitigation measures or expressed a desire for more mitigations, including mandatory isolation for COVID-19, despite the lack of mandates. People with an underlying health condition who represent more than half of all adults appear to be more careful with mitigations to avoid COVID-19.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Members of the public were invited to participate in a soft launch of the survey between 4th and 5th January 2023 to test flow and functionality, and to allow the final wording of survey questions to be refined as required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Public health strategies have focused on preventing and slowing the transmission of COVID-19 by promoting the uptake of mitigation strategies. However, little is known about the uptake of these strategies in the presence of underlying health conditions.

Objectives

To describe the attitudes and behaviours of a sample of Australians towards COVID-19 mitigation strategies, and determine if uptake of these strategies differed across different health conditions.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting and Participants

National survey of Australian residents over 18 years.

Main Outcome Measures

A purpose-built survey was used to collect participants' attitudes and behaviours towards COVID-19 mitigation strategies.

Results

Over half (53%) of the 2867 participants (99% completion rate) reported having one or more comorbidities. The most commonly self-reported health condition was cardiometabolic conditions (28%). Most participants disagreed that masks were no longer needed (74%) and wanted the 5-day isolation mandate (66%). More than one-third would like masks to be mandated for indoor spaces (38%) and 25% avoided going to hospitals. Participants with allergies (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14, 1.65), cardiometabolic (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.23, 1.79), respiratory (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.07, 1.62) and neurological (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.12, 2.32) conditions were more likely to avoid using public transport compared to those without. In contrast, participants with underlying mental health conditions were less likely to use N95/P2 facemasks in public spaces (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25, 0.87) compared to those without.

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of Australians continued to adopt COVID-19 mitigation measures or expressed a desire for more mitigations, including mandatory isolation for COVID-19, despite the lack of mandates. People with an underlying health condition who represent more than half of all adults appear to be more careful with mitigations to avoid COVID-19.

Patient or Public Contribution

Members of the public were invited to participate in a soft launch of the survey between 4th and 5th January 2023 to test flow and functionality, and to allow the final wording of survey questions to be refined as required.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有潜在健康问题的澳大利亚人对 COVID-19 缓解策略的态度和行为:横断面研究
背景 公共卫生战略的重点是通过促进采用缓解策略来预防和减缓 COVID-19 的传播。然而,人们对在有潜在健康问题的情况下采用这些策略的情况知之甚少。 目标 描述样本澳大利亚人对 COVID-19 缓解策略的态度和行为,并确定在不同的健康状况下对这些策略的接受程度是否有所不同。 设计 横断面研究。 地点和参与者 对澳大利亚 18 岁以上的居民进行全国性调查。 主要结果测量 采用专门设计的调查来收集参与者对 COVID-19 缓解策略的态度和行为。 结果 在2867名参与者中,超过一半(53%)的人(完成率为99%)表示患有一种或多种并发症。最常自我报告的健康状况是心脏代谢疾病(28%)。大多数参与者不同意不再需要口罩(74%),并希望获得 5 天隔离授权(66%)。超过三分之一的人希望在室内强制使用口罩(38%),25%的人避免去医院。与没有过敏症(OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14, 1.65)、心脏代谢疾病(OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.23, 1.79)、呼吸系统疾病(OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.07, 1.62)和神经系统疾病(OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.12, 2.32)的参与者相比,他们更倾向于避免使用公共交通工具。相比之下,有潜在精神健康问题的人与无潜在精神健康问题的人相比,在公共场所使用 N95/P2 口罩的可能性较低(OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25, 0.87)。 结论 尽管没有强制规定,但仍有相当一部分澳大利亚人继续采取 COVID-19 减缓措施,或表示希望采取更多的缓解措施,包括对 COVID-19 进行强制隔离。有潜在健康问题的人占成年人总数的一半以上,他们似乎对避免 COVID-19 的缓解措施更加谨慎。 患者或公众的贡献 我们邀请公众参与 2023 年 1 月 4 日至 5 日的调查试行,以测试流程和功能,并根据需要完善调查问题的最终措辞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study. 'The Letter Says I May or May Not Be Eligible… It Is a Big Doubt and Frustrating:' A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Children's Oral Healthcare From the Perspective of Karen Refugee Parents in Victoria. Beyond the Queue: Exploring Waiting Practices in the Stories of Patients With Breast Cancer Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1