Online misinformation warning labels work despite distrust of fact-checkers

IF 21.4 1区心理学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Nature Human Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1038/s41562-024-01974-w

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Could online warning labels from fact-checkers be ineffective — or perhaps even backfire — for individuals who distrust fact-checkers? Across 21 experiments, we found that the answer is no: warning labels reduce belief in, and sharing of, posts labelled as false both on average and for participants who strongly distrust fact-checkers.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

尽管人们对事实核查人员不信任，但网上错误信息警告标签仍然有效

对于不信任事实核查者的人来说，事实核查者的在线警告标签会不会无效，甚至适得其反？在 21 项实验中，我们发现答案是否定的：无论是平均水平还是对于那些强烈不信任事实核查者的参与者来说，警告标签都会降低他们对被标记为虚假的帖子的信任和分享。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Nature Human Behaviour Psychology-Social Psychology

CiteScore

36.80

自引率

1.00%

发文量

227

期刊介绍： Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.

期刊最新文献

Predicting replicability of COVID-19 social science preprints Becoming the ideal woman-of-colour academic for everyone but me Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in COVID-19 preprints Mutual inclusivity improves decision-making by smoothing out choice’s competitive edge Challenges and promises of big team comparative cognition