Understanding the Importance of Blood-Brain Barrier Alterations in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and Implications for Treatment: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI-Based Prospective Study.
{"title":"Understanding the Importance of Blood-Brain Barrier Alterations in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and Implications for Treatment: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced-MRI-Based Prospective Study.","authors":"Alejandra Mosteiro,Leire Pedrosa,Sergio Amaro,Sebastián Menéndez-Girón,Luis Reyes,Nicolás de Riva,Maite Misis,Jordi Blasco,Carla Vert,Carlos J Dominguez,Joaquim Enseñat,Abraham Martín,Ana Rodriguez-Hernández,Ramon Torné","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\r\nThe major clinical implication of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. There is a growing body of experimental evidence proving that inflammation and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction are involved in both the clinical course of the disease and the risk of bleeding. However, how bAVM treatment affects perilesional BBB disturbances is yet unclear.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe assessed the permeability changes of the BBB using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in a series of bAVMs (n = 35), before and at a mean of 5 (±2) days after treatment. A set of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) (n = 16) was used as a control group for the assessment of the surgical-related collateral changes. The extended Tofts pharmacokinetic model was used to extract permeability (Ktrans) values in the lesional, perilesional, and normal brain tissues.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn patients with bAVM, the permeability of BBB was higher in the perilesional of bAVM tissue compared with the rest of the brain parenchyma (mean Ktrans 0.145 ± 0.104 vs 0.084 ± 0.035, P = .004). Meanwhile, no significant changes were seen in the perilesional brain of CCM cases (mean Ktrans 0.055 ± 0.056 vs 0.061 ± 0.026, P = .96). A significant decrease in BBB permeability was evident in the perilesional area of bAVM after surgical resection (mean Ktrans 0.145 ± 0.104 vs 0.096 ± 0.059, P = .037). This benefit in BBB permeability reduction after surgery seemed to surpass the relative increase in permeability inherent to the surgical manipulation.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn contrast to CCMs, BBB permeability in patients with bAVM is increased in the perilesional parenchyma, as assessed using DCE-MRI. However, bAVM surgical resection seems to reduce BBB permeability in the perilesional tissue. No evidence of the so-called breakthrough phenomenon was detected in our series. DCE-MRI could become a valuable tool to follow the longitudinal course of BBB damage throughout the natural history and clinical course of bAVMs.","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The major clinical implication of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. There is a growing body of experimental evidence proving that inflammation and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction are involved in both the clinical course of the disease and the risk of bleeding. However, how bAVM treatment affects perilesional BBB disturbances is yet unclear.
METHODS
We assessed the permeability changes of the BBB using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in a series of bAVMs (n = 35), before and at a mean of 5 (±2) days after treatment. A set of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) (n = 16) was used as a control group for the assessment of the surgical-related collateral changes. The extended Tofts pharmacokinetic model was used to extract permeability (Ktrans) values in the lesional, perilesional, and normal brain tissues.
RESULTS
In patients with bAVM, the permeability of BBB was higher in the perilesional of bAVM tissue compared with the rest of the brain parenchyma (mean Ktrans 0.145 ± 0.104 vs 0.084 ± 0.035, P = .004). Meanwhile, no significant changes were seen in the perilesional brain of CCM cases (mean Ktrans 0.055 ± 0.056 vs 0.061 ± 0.026, P = .96). A significant decrease in BBB permeability was evident in the perilesional area of bAVM after surgical resection (mean Ktrans 0.145 ± 0.104 vs 0.096 ± 0.059, P = .037). This benefit in BBB permeability reduction after surgery seemed to surpass the relative increase in permeability inherent to the surgical manipulation.
CONCLUSION
In contrast to CCMs, BBB permeability in patients with bAVM is increased in the perilesional parenchyma, as assessed using DCE-MRI. However, bAVM surgical resection seems to reduce BBB permeability in the perilesional tissue. No evidence of the so-called breakthrough phenomenon was detected in our series. DCE-MRI could become a valuable tool to follow the longitudinal course of BBB damage throughout the natural history and clinical course of bAVMs.
期刊介绍:
Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery.
Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.