Don’t wait, vaccinate: evaluation of routine vaccination administration and reactogenicity in preterm infants

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1038/s41372-024-02111-1
Emily Abdelmessih, Purnahamsi V. Desai, Joanna Tracy, John Papadopoulos, Ferras Bashqoy
{"title":"Don’t wait, vaccinate: evaluation of routine vaccination administration and reactogenicity in preterm infants","authors":"Emily Abdelmessih, Purnahamsi V. Desai, Joanna Tracy, John Papadopoulos, Ferras Bashqoy","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02111-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the incidence of cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants when administering the 2-month vaccine series all at once compared to spreading vaccines over multiple days.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Study design</h3><p>This single-center, retrospective cohort study from 2019–2022 included preterm neonates receiving 2-month vaccinations. The primary outcome was incidence of cardiorespiratory events from time of initial vaccine administration up to 48 h after final administration. Univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of primary outcome.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>There were 127 patients (pre-practice change <i>n</i>1 = 52, post-practice change <i>n</i>2 = 75) included with no difference in the number of cardiorespiratory events between groups. Predictors of severe event included younger gestational age, smaller birth weight, shorter birth length, and greater cardiorespiratory events at baseline. Vaccine schedule interruptions occur more often when administration is spread over multiple days.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Administration of 2-month vaccinations all at once was not associated with increased cardiorespiratory events and prevents interruptions to vaccine schedule.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02111-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the incidence of cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants when administering the 2-month vaccine series all at once compared to spreading vaccines over multiple days.

Study design

This single-center, retrospective cohort study from 2019–2022 included preterm neonates receiving 2-month vaccinations. The primary outcome was incidence of cardiorespiratory events from time of initial vaccine administration up to 48 h after final administration. Univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of primary outcome.

Results

There were 127 patients (pre-practice change n1 = 52, post-practice change n2 = 75) included with no difference in the number of cardiorespiratory events between groups. Predictors of severe event included younger gestational age, smaller birth weight, shorter birth length, and greater cardiorespiratory events at baseline. Vaccine schedule interruptions occur more often when administration is spread over multiple days.

Conclusion

Administration of 2-month vaccinations all at once was not associated with increased cardiorespiratory events and prevents interruptions to vaccine schedule.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不要等待,接种疫苗:早产儿常规疫苗接种管理和反应性评估
目标评估早产儿一次性接种2个月系列疫苗与分多天接种疫苗相比,心肺事件的发生率。研究设计这项单中心、回顾性队列研究从2019年至2022年,纳入了接受2个月疫苗接种的早产新生儿。主要结果是首次接种疫苗至最终接种后 48 小时内心肺事件的发生率。结果共纳入 127 例患者(做法改变前 n1 = 52 例,做法改变后 n2 = 75 例),组间心肺事件发生率无差异。发生严重事件的预测因素包括妊娠年龄较小、出生体重较轻、出生身长较短以及基线时心肺事件较多。结论一次性接种两个月的疫苗与心肺事件的增加无关,可防止疫苗接种计划的中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
The road to sensory deprivation in the NICU is paved with good intentions: defining an optimal environment of care. Response of the ductus arteriosus to acetaminophen or indomethacin in extremely low birth weight infants. Nebulized salbutamol for the treatment of transient tachypnea of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial. Bemiparin in neonatal thrombosis: therapeutic dosing and safety. The feasibility of virtual home visits to address unmet needs after NICU discharge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1