首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Perinatology最新文献

英文 中文
The impact of standardization of care for neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation.
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02214-3
Faris N Al Gharaibeh, DonnaMaria E Cortezzo, Amy T Nathan, James M Greenberg

Objective: Determine the impact of standardization of care and counseling on survival and morbidities of neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation.

Design: Retrospective cohort study of 244 neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation between 2015 and 2023 in a large healthcare system. The primary outcome was survival of neonates receiving intensive care to NICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included morbidities and resource utilization.

Results: Neonates born at 22-23 weeks received more intensive care after care standardization (OR 5.4 (95% CI 2.3-12.6), p < 0.0001). Survival remained stable (aOR 0.93 (95% CI 0.32-2.7), p = 0.89) despite more neonates born at 22 weeks receiving intensive care. Resource utilization remained stable.

Conclusions: Standardizing counseling and care increased the provision of antenatal steroids and intensive care for neonates born at 22 weeks gestation. This allowed neonates born at 22 weeks to survive to discharge without increasing morbidity and resource utilization.

{"title":"The impact of standardization of care for neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation.","authors":"Faris N Al Gharaibeh, DonnaMaria E Cortezzo, Amy T Nathan, James M Greenberg","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02214-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02214-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the impact of standardization of care and counseling on survival and morbidities of neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of 244 neonates born at 22-23 weeks gestation between 2015 and 2023 in a large healthcare system. The primary outcome was survival of neonates receiving intensive care to NICU discharge. Secondary outcomes included morbidities and resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neonates born at 22-23 weeks received more intensive care after care standardization (OR 5.4 (95% CI 2.3-12.6), p < 0.0001). Survival remained stable (aOR 0.93 (95% CI 0.32-2.7), p = 0.89) despite more neonates born at 22 weeks receiving intensive care. Resource utilization remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardizing counseling and care increased the provision of antenatal steroids and intensive care for neonates born at 22 weeks gestation. This allowed neonates born at 22 weeks to survive to discharge without increasing morbidity and resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143189713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is it time for a separate residency and department in "Neonatal Critical Care Medicine"?
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02219-y
Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Robin H Steinhorn

Recent changes in pediatric residency curriculum require reductions in the duration of NICU rotations. Low interest in pediatrics among medical students coupled with reduced exposure to neonatology during residency are likely to decrease applications to neonatology fellowships. We propose a separate neonatal critical care residency combining 1-2 years of pediatrics followed by 3 years of neonatology rotations (total 4-5 years) to enhance recruitment. There is also a need to reengage the neonatology community to be role models and inspire and attract medical students to neonatology. Academic neonatology is facing a crisis. Long hours, high productivity expectations, and significantly lower compensation compared to non-academic settings is contributing to physician disengagement. A transparent cFTE definition, better governing structure, strategic allocation of resources to recruit, retain and nurture neonatal physician-scientists and engaged clinician-educators are needed. If these measures are not effective, a separate department of neonatal critical care medicine should be considered.

儿科住院医师培训课程的最新变化要求缩短新生儿重症监护室的轮转时间。医科学生对儿科的兴趣不高,再加上住院实习期间接触新生儿科的机会减少,这很可能会减少新生儿科奖学金的申请。我们建议开设单独的新生儿重症监护住院医师培训课程,其中包括 1-2 年的儿科课程和 3 年的新生儿科轮转课程(共 4-5 年),以加强招生工作。此外,还需要让新生儿学界重新参与进来,成为榜样,激励和吸引医学生加入新生儿学。新生儿学界正面临危机。与非学术环境相比,漫长的工作时间、较高的生产率预期以及明显较低的薪酬导致医生脱离学术环境。我们需要一个透明的 cFTE 定义、更好的管理结构、战略性的资源分配,以招募、留住和培养新生儿科医生科学家和临床医生教育工作者。如果这些措施无效,则应考虑成立独立的新生儿重症医学系。
{"title":"Is it time for a separate residency and department in \"Neonatal Critical Care Medicine\"?","authors":"Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Robin H Steinhorn","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02219-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02219-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent changes in pediatric residency curriculum require reductions in the duration of NICU rotations. Low interest in pediatrics among medical students coupled with reduced exposure to neonatology during residency are likely to decrease applications to neonatology fellowships. We propose a separate neonatal critical care residency combining 1-2 years of pediatrics followed by 3 years of neonatology rotations (total 4-5 years) to enhance recruitment. There is also a need to reengage the neonatology community to be role models and inspire and attract medical students to neonatology. Academic neonatology is facing a crisis. Long hours, high productivity expectations, and significantly lower compensation compared to non-academic settings is contributing to physician disengagement. A transparent cFTE definition, better governing structure, strategic allocation of resources to recruit, retain and nurture neonatal physician-scientists and engaged clinician-educators are needed. If these measures are not effective, a separate department of neonatal critical care medicine should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143189710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early exclusive enteral feeding in 30-33 weeks gestation infants: a randomized controlled trial.
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02217-0
Belal N Alshaikh, Ossama Hassan, Wissam Alburaki, Dinesh Dharel, Adel Elsharkawy, Nalini Singal, Kamran Yusuf, Essa Al Awad

Objective: To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of early exclusive enteral feeding (EEEF) in reducing time to achieve full enteral feeds.

Methods: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of infants born at 300/7-336/7 weeks gestation. Infants were randomly assigned to receive EEEF (60-80 mL/kg/day) or conventional feeding (20-30 mL/kg/day) with intravenous fluids after birth. Feed volumes were increased by 20-30 mL/kg/day. Primary outcome was time to reach full enteral feeds.

Results: Seventy infants were enrolled. Infants in EEEF group achieved full feeds sooner [Mean difference (MD) -1.2 (95%CI -1.8, -0.7)], required fewer hours of parenteral nutrition [0 (IQR 0, 19) vs. 91 (IQR 48, 132) hours, P < 0.001], had less need for central venous access (11.4% vs. 37.1%, P = 0.01) and had shorter hospital stays [MD -6.6 (95%CI -12.9, -0.2) days].

Conclusion: Early exclusive enteral feeding in 300/7-336/7 weeks gestation infants is feasible and reduces time required to achieve full enteral feeds and length of hospital stay.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03708068.

{"title":"Early exclusive enteral feeding in 30-33 weeks gestation infants: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Belal N Alshaikh, Ossama Hassan, Wissam Alburaki, Dinesh Dharel, Adel Elsharkawy, Nalini Singal, Kamran Yusuf, Essa Al Awad","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02217-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02217-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of early exclusive enteral feeding (EEEF) in reducing time to achieve full enteral feeds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of infants born at 30<sup>0/7</sup>-33<sup>6/7</sup> weeks gestation. Infants were randomly assigned to receive EEEF (60-80 mL/kg/day) or conventional feeding (20-30 mL/kg/day) with intravenous fluids after birth. Feed volumes were increased by 20-30 mL/kg/day. Primary outcome was time to reach full enteral feeds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy infants were enrolled. Infants in EEEF group achieved full feeds sooner [Mean difference (MD) -1.2 (95%CI -1.8, -0.7)], required fewer hours of parenteral nutrition [0 (IQR 0, 19) vs. 91 (IQR 48, 132) hours, P < 0.001], had less need for central venous access (11.4% vs. 37.1%, P = 0.01) and had shorter hospital stays [MD -6.6 (95%CI -12.9, -0.2) days].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early exclusive enteral feeding in 30<sup>0/7</sup>-33<sup>6/7</sup> weeks gestation infants is feasible and reduces time required to achieve full enteral feeds and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03708068.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143080275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neonatology fellow assessment and evaluation: embracing the word salad of CBME, EPAs, and milestones.
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02208-7
Courtney McLean, Beverley Robin, Johannah M Scheurer, Kathryn E K Berlin, Megan M Gray, Deirdre O'Reilly, Heather French, Margarita M Vasquez, Mark Castera, Katherine M Redford, Lindsay C Johnston, Patrick J Myers

Neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship training aims to educate fellows and enable them to move into successful independent neonatal practice. To reach this goal, every fellow must acquire a wide range of clinical, scholarly, and professional skills that require assessment and evaluation by the fellowship program. The assessment and evaluation of fellow progression and promotion must rely on a rigorous educational framework. The goal of this article is to illustrate the process of NPM fellow assessment and evaluation, introduce the educational framework utilized, describe challenges inherent to the process, and discuss opportunities to improve how NPM fellows are evaluated.

{"title":"Neonatology fellow assessment and evaluation: embracing the word salad of CBME, EPAs, and milestones.","authors":"Courtney McLean, Beverley Robin, Johannah M Scheurer, Kathryn E K Berlin, Megan M Gray, Deirdre O'Reilly, Heather French, Margarita M Vasquez, Mark Castera, Katherine M Redford, Lindsay C Johnston, Patrick J Myers","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02208-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02208-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship training aims to educate fellows and enable them to move into successful independent neonatal practice. To reach this goal, every fellow must acquire a wide range of clinical, scholarly, and professional skills that require assessment and evaluation by the fellowship program. The assessment and evaluation of fellow progression and promotion must rely on a rigorous educational framework. The goal of this article is to illustrate the process of NPM fellow assessment and evaluation, introduce the educational framework utilized, describe challenges inherent to the process, and discuss opportunities to improve how NPM fellows are evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143066305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in the treatment and outcomes of different severities of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in California: a retrospective cohort study.
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02212-5
Carolyn Fall, Rebecca J Baer, Henry C Lee, Gretchen Bandoli, Christina D Chambers

Objective: Evaluate the changes in management and outcomes of Californian infants with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

Study design: Infants with HIE were identified from a California administrative birth cohort using ICD codes and divided into two epochs, Epoch 1 (2010-2015) and Epoch 2 (2016-2019). Risk ratios (RR) for induced hypothermia (IH) in each epoch and their outcomes were calculated using log-linear regression.

Results: In this cohort, 4779 infants with HIE were identified. Incidence of HIE in California increased yearly from 0.5/1000 California births to a peak of 1.5/1000 births in 2018. The use of IH in infants with mild HIE increased in Epoch 2 compared to Epoch 1. There was no significant difference in outcomes between epochs for infants with mild HIE that received IH including no difference in neonatal seizures.

Conclusion: Significantly more infants with mild HIE received IH since 2015 in California, but no significant difference in outcomes.

{"title":"Changes in the treatment and outcomes of different severities of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in California: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Carolyn Fall, Rebecca J Baer, Henry C Lee, Gretchen Bandoli, Christina D Chambers","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02212-5","DOIUrl":"10.1038/s41372-025-02212-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the changes in management and outcomes of Californian infants with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Infants with HIE were identified from a California administrative birth cohort using ICD codes and divided into two epochs, Epoch 1 (2010-2015) and Epoch 2 (2016-2019). Risk ratios (RR) for induced hypothermia (IH) in each epoch and their outcomes were calculated using log-linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort, 4779 infants with HIE were identified. Incidence of HIE in California increased yearly from 0.5/1000 California births to a peak of 1.5/1000 births in 2018. The use of IH in infants with mild HIE increased in Epoch 2 compared to Epoch 1. There was no significant difference in outcomes between epochs for infants with mild HIE that received IH including no difference in neonatal seizures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significantly more infants with mild HIE received IH since 2015 in California, but no significant difference in outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143046968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of Perinatal Antibiotic Stewardship - where we are, where to go? 围产期抗生素管理的系统回顾——我们在哪里,往哪里去?
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02209-0
Cristina Winteler, Sara Ardabili, Markus Hodel, Martin Stocker

The perinatal period is associated with high antibiotic exposure, which raises concerns about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and future health impacts. The aim of this comprehensive systematic review, including publications from 2000 to 2022, is to describe the current evidence and state of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the perinatal period and to identify gaps in knowledge for future research. The review included 36 studies from the Americas, Europe, Asia and Australia, involving a total of 64,798 pregnant women and 84,137 newborns. 33 out of 36 studies reported reduced antibiotic use, suggesting the potential to reduce antibiotic exposure. There is a lack of studies in the antepartum and intrapartum periods, of comprehensive AMS strategies across the entire perinatal period, and from low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Future research should include prospective, adequately powered studies including safety endpoints, clinical outcomes and AMR reports.

围产期与抗生素暴露量高有关,这引起了对抗菌素耐药性和未来健康影响的关注。这项全面系统综述的目的是描述围产期抗微生物药物管理(AMS)的现有证据和状况,并确定未来研究的知识差距。该综述包括来自美洲、欧洲、亚洲和澳大利亚的36项研究,共涉及64,798名孕妇和84137名新生儿。36项研究中有33项报告减少了抗生素的使用,这表明有可能减少抗生素暴露。缺乏关于产前和分娩期间、整个围产期综合辅助医疗服务战略的研究,以及来自孕产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率高负担的中低收入国家的研究。未来的研究应包括前瞻性、充分有力的研究,包括安全性终点、临床结果和AMR报告。
{"title":"A systematic review of Perinatal Antibiotic Stewardship - where we are, where to go?","authors":"Cristina Winteler, Sara Ardabili, Markus Hodel, Martin Stocker","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02209-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02209-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perinatal period is associated with high antibiotic exposure, which raises concerns about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and future health impacts. The aim of this comprehensive systematic review, including publications from 2000 to 2022, is to describe the current evidence and state of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the perinatal period and to identify gaps in knowledge for future research. The review included 36 studies from the Americas, Europe, Asia and Australia, involving a total of 64,798 pregnant women and 84,137 newborns. 33 out of 36 studies reported reduced antibiotic use, suggesting the potential to reduce antibiotic exposure. There is a lack of studies in the antepartum and intrapartum periods, of comprehensive AMS strategies across the entire perinatal period, and from low- and middle-income countries with a high burden of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Future research should include prospective, adequately powered studies including safety endpoints, clinical outcomes and AMR reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
NeoScore: a new tool to assess technical and non-technical skills during neonatal resuscitation. NeoScore:一种评估新生儿复苏过程中技术性和非技术性技能的新工具。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-025-02210-7
Leonardo Meggiolaro, Gary Weiner, Alex Staffler, Fiorenzo Lupi, Tommaso Canesso, Daniele Trevisanuto

Background: Training with high-technology manikins improves cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention, but a checklist to assess both technical and non-technical skills is lacking. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist to evaluate healthcare's performance during simulated Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) scenarios.

Materials and methods: Twenty-two international neonatal resuscitation experts participated in a two-step modified Delphi process, rating each checklist item on a scale of 1-5 and providing feedback. Items with a mean rating below 4 or receiving comments were reviewed. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the final tool was assessed using video-recordings of simulated scenarios.

Results: The final checklist, validated by 15 experts, includes 33 items. Mean expert rating of all items was 4.35. The checklist showed moderate inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.67) overall, with excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8) for technical skills.

Conclusion: The tool effectively evaluates technical skills but requires further refinement for non-technical skills assessment.

背景:使用高科技人体模型训练可以提高心肺复苏(CPR)技能的保留,但缺乏评估技术和非技术技能的检查表。本研究旨在制定一个标准化的检查表,以评估在模拟新生儿复苏计划(NRP)情景下医疗保健的表现。材料与方法:22名国际新生儿复苏专家参与了两步修正德尔菲法,对每个检查表项目进行1-5分的评分并提供反馈。对平均评分低于4或收到评论的项目进行审查。使用模拟场景的视频记录来评估最终工具的内部可靠性(IRR)。结果:经15位专家验证的最终检查表包含33个项目。所有题目的平均专家评分为4.35分。量表总体上显示中等的量表间信度(ICC = 0.67),其中技术技能的量表具有优异的信度(ICC = 0.8)。结论:该工具可有效评估技术技能,但非技术技能评估需进一步完善。
{"title":"NeoScore: a new tool to assess technical and non-technical skills during neonatal resuscitation.","authors":"Leonardo Meggiolaro, Gary Weiner, Alex Staffler, Fiorenzo Lupi, Tommaso Canesso, Daniele Trevisanuto","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02210-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02210-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training with high-technology manikins improves cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention, but a checklist to assess both technical and non-technical skills is lacking. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist to evaluate healthcare's performance during simulated Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) scenarios.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two international neonatal resuscitation experts participated in a two-step modified Delphi process, rating each checklist item on a scale of 1-5 and providing feedback. Items with a mean rating below 4 or receiving comments were reviewed. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the final tool was assessed using video-recordings of simulated scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final checklist, validated by 15 experts, includes 33 items. Mean expert rating of all items was 4.35. The checklist showed moderate inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.67) overall, with excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8) for technical skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tool effectively evaluates technical skills but requires further refinement for non-technical skills assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term feeding outcomes after infant tracheostomy. 婴儿气管切开术后的长期喂养结果。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02205-w
Elena Stekolchik, Md Jobayer Hossain, J Heather Northam, Seema Rani, Abigail Strang, Aaron Chidekel

Objective: To characterize long-term feeding outcomes in infants who underwent tracheostomy prior to their first birthday.

Study design: Retrospective review of feeding outcomes at initial hospital discharge and age 5 in a cohort of infants who underwent tracheostomy at a children's hospital over a 16-year period.

Results: 145 infants met inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 117 were feeding tube dependent at time of initial hospital discharge and 71 were feeding tube dependent age 5. Cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.009), long-term tracheostomy dependence (p < 0.001), higher birth weight (p = 0.011), older age at tracheostomy decannulation (p < 0.001) and older gestational age (p = 0.007) were factors associated with feeding tube dependence at age 5.

Conclusion: The long-term feeding outcomes of infants who require tracheostomy demonstrate high levels of feeding impairment at age 5.

目的:研究1岁前气管切开术婴儿的长期喂养结果。研究设计:回顾性分析在一家儿童医院接受气管切开术的一组婴儿16年间出院时和5岁时的喂养结果。结果:145例患儿符合纳入标准。在本队列中,117例患者在初次出院时依赖饲管,71例患者在5岁时依赖饲管。结论:需要气管切开术的婴儿在5岁时的长期喂养结果显示出高水平的喂养障碍。
{"title":"Long-term feeding outcomes after infant tracheostomy.","authors":"Elena Stekolchik, Md Jobayer Hossain, J Heather Northam, Seema Rani, Abigail Strang, Aaron Chidekel","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02205-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02205-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize long-term feeding outcomes in infants who underwent tracheostomy prior to their first birthday.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of feeding outcomes at initial hospital discharge and age 5 in a cohort of infants who underwent tracheostomy at a children's hospital over a 16-year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>145 infants met inclusion criteria. In this cohort, 117 were feeding tube dependent at time of initial hospital discharge and 71 were feeding tube dependent age 5. Cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.009), long-term tracheostomy dependence (p < 0.001), higher birth weight (p = 0.011), older age at tracheostomy decannulation (p < 0.001) and older gestational age (p = 0.007) were factors associated with feeding tube dependence at age 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The long-term feeding outcomes of infants who require tracheostomy demonstrate high levels of feeding impairment at age 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preterm growth assessment: the latest findings on age correction. 早产儿生长评估:年龄校正的最新发现。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02202-z
Seham Elmrayed, Susan Dai, Abhay Lodha, Manoj Kumar, Tanis R Fenton

Objective: To evaluate the effect of age correction up to 36 months of age for growth assessments of extremely preterm (<28 weeks) and very preterm (28 to <32 weeks) infants.

Study design: This longitudinal analysis used data from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (2001-2014).

Results: 1,416 children were included (Median gestational age = 27 weeks). Chronological age-based weight, height, and head circumference z-scores were consistently lower than those based on corrected age for all ages (0, 4, 8, 21 and 36 months) by up to -5.2 (95% confidence interval -5.4, -5.1) z-scores for length at term. Using chronological age, higher proportions of children were misclassified as having suboptimal growth (up to 72.9% misdiagnosed as stunted and 89.8% misdiagnosed as underweight at term).

Conclusion: For extremely and very preterm children, age correction is required for all growth measures through 36 months of corrected age.

目的:评估36月龄前的年龄校正对极早产儿生长评估的影响(研究设计:该纵向分析使用了早产儿多中心生长研究(2001-2014)的数据。结果:纳入1416名儿童(中位胎龄= 27周)。在所有年龄(0、4、8、21和36个月)中,基于年龄的体重、身高和头围z-得分始终低于基于校正年龄的z-得分,最长可达-5.2(95%置信区间-5.4,-5.1)。根据实足年龄,较高比例的儿童被误诊为发育不佳(高达72.9%被误诊为发育迟缓,89.8%被误诊为足月体重不足)。结论:对于极早产儿和极早产儿,在校正年龄36个月前的所有生长测量都需要年龄校正。
{"title":"Preterm growth assessment: the latest findings on age correction.","authors":"Seham Elmrayed, Susan Dai, Abhay Lodha, Manoj Kumar, Tanis R Fenton","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02202-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02202-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of age correction up to 36 months of age for growth assessments of extremely preterm (<28 weeks) and very preterm (28 to <32 weeks) infants.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This longitudinal analysis used data from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (2001-2014).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,416 children were included (Median gestational age = 27 weeks). Chronological age-based weight, height, and head circumference z-scores were consistently lower than those based on corrected age for all ages (0, 4, 8, 21 and 36 months) by up to -5.2 (95% confidence interval -5.4, -5.1) z-scores for length at term. Using chronological age, higher proportions of children were misclassified as having suboptimal growth (up to 72.9% misdiagnosed as stunted and 89.8% misdiagnosed as underweight at term).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For extremely and very preterm children, age correction is required for all growth measures through 36 months of corrected age.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accuracy of lung ultrasound in predicting successful extubation in preterm infants born ≤ 25 weeks. 肺超声预测≤25周早产儿拔管成功率的准确性。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02206-9
Haifeng Zong, Bingchun Lin, Yingsui Huang, Yichu Huang, Hongyan Sun, Qingling Xu, Zile Lin, Jiamin Wu, Chuanzhong Yang

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the predictive value of the lung ultrasound score (LUS) for successful extubation in preterm infants born at ≤25+6 weeks.

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Preterm infants with gestational age (GA) ≤ 25+6 weeks who received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for ≥72 h were included. Lung ultrasound was performed every day. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that predict extubation outcomes.

Results: Ninety-three infants with GA ≤ 25+6 weeks were included. The mean GA was 24.5 ± 1.2 weeks. Extubation failure occurred in 55 (59.1%) neonates, and success occurred in 38 (40.9%) neonates. The LUS was significantly lower in the successful group than in the failed group (24.0 ± 2.5 vs. 32.1 ± 3.1 p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that LUS was an independent predictor of successful extubation (odd ratio 0.15 [95% CI 0.045-0.508], P = 0.002). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (p < 0.001) for LUS, and a cutoff value of ≥ 28 had 94.6% sensitivity and 92.7% specificity in detecting extubation failure.

Conclusion: The LUS has good accuracy for predicting successful extubation in extremely preterm infants with GA ≤ 25+6 weeks.

目的:本研究旨在探讨肺超声评分(LUS)对≤25+6周早产儿拔管成功的预测价值。方法:这是一项单中心、前瞻性队列研究。纳入胎龄(GA)≤25+6周且接受有创机械通气(IMV)≥72 h的早产儿。每天进行肺部超声检查。采用多因素logistic回归分析评价预测拔管结果的因素。结果:纳入GA≤25+6周的患儿93例。平均GA为24.5±1.2周。拔管失败55例(59.1%),成功38例(40.9%)。成功组的LUS明显低于失败组(24.0±2.5∶32.1±3.1 p)。结论:LUS对GA≤25+6周的极早产儿拔管成功有较好的预测准确性。
{"title":"Accuracy of lung ultrasound in predicting successful extubation in preterm infants born ≤ 25 weeks.","authors":"Haifeng Zong, Bingchun Lin, Yingsui Huang, Yichu Huang, Hongyan Sun, Qingling Xu, Zile Lin, Jiamin Wu, Chuanzhong Yang","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02206-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02206-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the predictive value of the lung ultrasound score (LUS) for successful extubation in preterm infants born at ≤25<sup>+6</sup> weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Preterm infants with gestational age (GA) ≤ 25<sup>+6</sup> weeks who received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for ≥72 h were included. Lung ultrasound was performed every day. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that predict extubation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three infants with GA ≤ 25<sup>+6</sup> weeks were included. The mean GA was 24.5 ± 1.2 weeks. Extubation failure occurred in 55 (59.1%) neonates, and success occurred in 38 (40.9%) neonates. The LUS was significantly lower in the successful group than in the failed group (24.0 ± 2.5 vs. 32.1 ± 3.1 p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that LUS was an independent predictor of successful extubation (odd ratio 0.15 [95% CI 0.045-0.508], P = 0.002). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (p < 0.001) for LUS, and a cutoff value of ≥ 28 had 94.6% sensitivity and 92.7% specificity in detecting extubation failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LUS has good accuracy for predicting successful extubation in extremely preterm infants with GA ≤ 25<sup>+6</sup> weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Perinatology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1