‘I have gained insight, direction, affirmation, and a network’. Examining the impact of the UK's first LGBTQ+ specific leadership development programme in higher education

IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Management Administration & Leadership Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1177/17411432241260946
Catherine Lee, Daniel Burman
{"title":"‘I have gained insight, direction, affirmation, and a network’. Examining the impact of the UK's first LGBTQ+ specific leadership development programme in higher education","authors":"Catherine Lee, Daniel Burman","doi":"10.1177/17411432241260946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the UK's first specific lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) leadership development programme in higher education. It assesses the programme's value for the participants, who comprised of 12 colleagues in academic and professional services roles in one English Post 92 University. The year-long programme offered leadership training, mentoring and networking to LGBTQ+ staff in aspiring to leadership roles. It adopted Whitmore's GROW coaching model and promoted authenticity in the workplace and authentic leadership. The article contends that leadership development initiatives for those with protected characteristics are important in an evolving higher education landscape which is ever more complex. Despite tensions with the concept of authenticity, the article is rooted in a post-structuralist theoretical framework that rejects essentialist views of gender and sexuality. Instead, it aligns with a Butlerian paradigm, where gender and sexual identities are diverse, fragmented and perpetually evolving in relation to others and within systems of power and knowledge. The leadership programme did not assume that LGBTQ+ individuals are intrinsically different from their heterosexual and cisgender peers. However, it developed in its participants, the insight to see that their distinct life experiences as an LGBTQ+ person in a hetero- and cisnormative society had given them a distinct set of attributes conducive to effective and authentic leadership.","PeriodicalId":47885,"journal":{"name":"Educational Management Administration & Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Management Administration & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241260946","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the UK's first specific lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) leadership development programme in higher education. It assesses the programme's value for the participants, who comprised of 12 colleagues in academic and professional services roles in one English Post 92 University. The year-long programme offered leadership training, mentoring and networking to LGBTQ+ staff in aspiring to leadership roles. It adopted Whitmore's GROW coaching model and promoted authenticity in the workplace and authentic leadership. The article contends that leadership development initiatives for those with protected characteristics are important in an evolving higher education landscape which is ever more complex. Despite tensions with the concept of authenticity, the article is rooted in a post-structuralist theoretical framework that rejects essentialist views of gender and sexuality. Instead, it aligns with a Butlerian paradigm, where gender and sexual identities are diverse, fragmented and perpetually evolving in relation to others and within systems of power and knowledge. The leadership programme did not assume that LGBTQ+ individuals are intrinsically different from their heterosexual and cisgender peers. However, it developed in its participants, the insight to see that their distinct life experiences as an LGBTQ+ person in a hetero- and cisnormative society had given them a distinct set of attributes conducive to effective and authentic leadership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我获得了洞察力、方向、肯定和网络"。考察英国高等教育中首个专门针对 LGBTQ+ 的领导力发展计划的影响
本文探讨了英国高等教育中首个专门针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋或质疑者(LGBTQ+)的领导力发展计划。该项目由一所英国 92 后大学的 12 名学术和专业服务人员组成,文章评估了该项目对参与者的价值。该计划为期一年,为有志于担任领导职务的 LGBTQ+ 员工提供领导力培训、指导和交流。该计划采用惠特莫尔的 GROW 教练模式,提倡工作场所的真实性和真实的领导力。文章认为,在日益复杂的高等教育环境中,针对具有受保护特征者的领导力发展计划非常重要。尽管与 "真实性 "的概念存在矛盾,但文章植根于后结构主义理论框架,摒弃了对性别和性的本质主义观点。相反,它符合布特勒的范式,即性别和性身份是多样的、支离破碎的,并在与他人的关系中以及在权力和知识体系中不断演变。领导力计划并不假定 LGBTQ+ 个人与其异性恋和顺性别同龄人有本质区别。然而,它培养了参与者的洞察力,使他们看到,在一个异性恋和顺性别规范社会中,作为一名 LGBTQ+ 人,他们独特的生活经历赋予了他们一套独特的属性,有利于有效和真实地发挥领导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Educational Management Administration & Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
19.40%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
School leadership and student outcomes: What do we know? Gender differences in school leadership: Collaborative and task-oriented styles of principals in Andalusia, Spain ‘I have gained insight, direction, affirmation, and a network’. Examining the impact of the UK's first LGBTQ+ specific leadership development programme in higher education Participative decision-making in the Arab educational system in Israel: The implications for teachers’ organizational commitment and school violence Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for validating a distributed leadership inventory for secondary schools in Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1