The Efficacy of Ischemic Preconditioning on Handgrip Strength and Strength Endurance in Para-Athletes With Spinal-Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY International journal of sports physiology and performance Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2024-0188
Lexi Kasofsky,Rebecca Cross,Dallin Tavoian,Jason Siegler
{"title":"The Efficacy of Ischemic Preconditioning on Handgrip Strength and Strength Endurance in Para-Athletes With Spinal-Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Lexi Kasofsky,Rebecca Cross,Dallin Tavoian,Jason Siegler","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThis pilot study investigated the functional outcomes after ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in high-level para-athletes with spinal-cord injury.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nNine athletes completed 2 handgrip exercise trials (an isometric hold to failure at 60% maximal voluntary contraction [ISO] and a progressive, intermittent handgrip to failure [INT]), preceded by either IPC (220 mm Hg) or sham (20 mm Hg) for six 5-minute periods, in a repeated-measures, crossover design.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAlthough small performance improvements in time to task failure were observed in the ISO (∼5%) and INT (∼8%) IPC conditions, which are similar to those reported elsewhere, no statistical influence was observed (ISO-IPC, 74.2 [32.6] s; SHAM, 70.7 [27.2] s; P = .73; INT-IPC, 426.0 [80.1] s; SHAM, 392.2 [42.5] s; P = .35). Fatigue was evident in the forearm muscle force (maximal voluntary contraction) ISO (mean decline of 178.1 [76.0] N [95% CI, -10.4 to 366.7 N]; P < .05) and INT (mean decline of 182.2 [72.5] N [95% CI, 34.5-329.8 N]; P < .05) trials but not different between treatments (P > .95).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAlthough small performance improvements in time to task failure were observed, the findings of the present data set suggest that acute bouts of IPC do not meaningfully influence fatigue during handgrip exercise in para-athletes with spinal-cord injury.","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This pilot study investigated the functional outcomes after ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in high-level para-athletes with spinal-cord injury. METHODS Nine athletes completed 2 handgrip exercise trials (an isometric hold to failure at 60% maximal voluntary contraction [ISO] and a progressive, intermittent handgrip to failure [INT]), preceded by either IPC (220 mm Hg) or sham (20 mm Hg) for six 5-minute periods, in a repeated-measures, crossover design. RESULTS Although small performance improvements in time to task failure were observed in the ISO (∼5%) and INT (∼8%) IPC conditions, which are similar to those reported elsewhere, no statistical influence was observed (ISO-IPC, 74.2 [32.6] s; SHAM, 70.7 [27.2] s; P = .73; INT-IPC, 426.0 [80.1] s; SHAM, 392.2 [42.5] s; P = .35). Fatigue was evident in the forearm muscle force (maximal voluntary contraction) ISO (mean decline of 178.1 [76.0] N [95% CI, -10.4 to 366.7 N]; P < .05) and INT (mean decline of 182.2 [72.5] N [95% CI, 34.5-329.8 N]; P < .05) trials but not different between treatments (P > .95). CONCLUSIONS Although small performance improvements in time to task failure were observed, the findings of the present data set suggest that acute bouts of IPC do not meaningfully influence fatigue during handgrip exercise in para-athletes with spinal-cord injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺血预处理对脊髓损伤残疾人运动员手握力和力量耐力的功效:一项试点研究
目的这项试验性研究调查了脊髓损伤的高水平准运动员进行缺血预处理(IPC)后的功能结果。方法9名运动员完成了2次手握运动试验(等长保持至60%最大自主收缩[ISO]失败和渐进、间歇性手握至失败[INT]),在此之前进行了6次5分钟的IPC(220毫米汞柱)或假IPC(20毫米汞柱),采用重复测量、交叉设计。结果虽然在 ISO(∼5%)和 INT(∼8%)IPC 条件下,任务失败时间的表现略有改善,与其他地方报道的情况相似,但未观察到统计学影响(ISO-IPC,74.2 [32.6] s;SHAM,70.7 [27.2] s;P = .73;INT-IPC,426.0 [80.1] s;SHAM,392.2 [42.5] s;P = .35)。疲劳在前臂肌力(最大自主收缩)ISO(平均下降 178.1 [76.0] N [95% CI, -10.4 至 366.7 N];P < .05)和 INT(平均下降 182.2 [72.5] N [95% CI, 34.5-329.8 N];P < .05)试验中很明显,但不同治疗之间没有差异(P > .结论虽然在任务失败时间方面观察到了微小的成绩改善,但本数据集的结果表明,IPC 的急性发作不会对脊髓损伤的准运动员在手握运动中的疲劳产生有意义的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
期刊最新文献
Manual Dexterity in Open-Water Wetsuited Swimmers: A Cohort Crossover Study. No Effect of Individualized Sodium Bicarbonate Supplementation on 200-m or 400-m Freestyle-Swimming Time-Trial Performance in Well-Trained Athletes. Comparing Differences and Relationships Between Traditional and Resisted Sprints in Elite Youth Rugby Backs and Forwards. Erratum. "Falling Behind," "Letting Go," and Being "Outsprinted" as Distinct Features of Pacing in Distance Running. An Educational Review on Machine Learning: A SWOT Analysis for Implementing Machine Learning Techniques in Football.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1