Optimal Follow-up Time Before Discharge in Patients with Penetrating Anterior Abdominal Stab Wound Not Requiring Laparotomy

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Indian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s12262-024-04148-0
Metin Yucel, Muhammed Taha Demirpolat, Fikret Ezberci
{"title":"Optimal Follow-up Time Before Discharge in Patients with Penetrating Anterior Abdominal Stab Wound Not Requiring Laparotomy","authors":"Metin Yucel, Muhammed Taha Demirpolat, Fikret Ezberci","doi":"10.1007/s12262-024-04148-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds who do not require emergency laparotomy should be followed up for a certain period of time for the possible need for laparotomy. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of nonoperative follow-up of patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab wounds before discharge. Emergency laparotomy was performed in patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab wounds who were hemodynamically unstable and had signs of peritonitis on initial admission. Patients who did not require emergency laparotomy in the initial evaluation were hospitalized for observation and followed up with a physical examination for 48 h due to possible peritonitis. At the end of this period, patients who did not require laparotomy were discharged nonoperatively. Demographic characteristics of the patients and the time from admission to laparotomy were investigated and the data were analyzed. The study included 481 patients, 440(91.48%) of whom were men. Of these patients, 143(29.73%) underwent laparotomy and the remaining 338 patients were discharged nonoperatively. Of the 143 laparotomies, 67 (46.85%) were emergency, 91 (63.63%) within 4 h (including emergency laparotomy), 115 (80.42%) within 8 h, 126 (88.11%) within 12 h, 137 (95.80%) within 24 h, and 141 (98.60%) within 48 h. Two (1.40%) patients underwent laparotomy beyond 48 h. Asymptomatic patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab wounds not requiring laparotomy can be discharged after 48 h of observation with a small missed risk of intra-abdominal injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":13391,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04148-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds who do not require emergency laparotomy should be followed up for a certain period of time for the possible need for laparotomy. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of nonoperative follow-up of patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab wounds before discharge. Emergency laparotomy was performed in patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab wounds who were hemodynamically unstable and had signs of peritonitis on initial admission. Patients who did not require emergency laparotomy in the initial evaluation were hospitalized for observation and followed up with a physical examination for 48 h due to possible peritonitis. At the end of this period, patients who did not require laparotomy were discharged nonoperatively. Demographic characteristics of the patients and the time from admission to laparotomy were investigated and the data were analyzed. The study included 481 patients, 440(91.48%) of whom were men. Of these patients, 143(29.73%) underwent laparotomy and the remaining 338 patients were discharged nonoperatively. Of the 143 laparotomies, 67 (46.85%) were emergency, 91 (63.63%) within 4 h (including emergency laparotomy), 115 (80.42%) within 8 h, 126 (88.11%) within 12 h, 137 (95.80%) within 24 h, and 141 (98.60%) within 48 h. Two (1.40%) patients underwent laparotomy beyond 48 h. Asymptomatic patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab wounds not requiring laparotomy can be discharged after 48 h of observation with a small missed risk of intra-abdominal injury.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无需开腹手术的穿透性前腹刺伤患者出院前的最佳随访时间
对于不需要紧急开腹手术的穿透性腹部刀伤患者,应进行一段时间的随访,以确定是否需要开腹手术。本研究的目的是确定穿透性前腹部刀刺伤患者出院前非手术随访的最佳时间。对血流动力学不稳定、入院时有腹膜炎症状的前腹部贯穿性刀伤患者进行了紧急开腹手术。初步评估时不需要紧急开腹手术的患者因可能出现腹膜炎而住院观察,并进行 48 小时的体格检查随访。48小时后,无需开腹手术的患者非手术出院。研究人员调查了患者的人口统计学特征以及从入院到开腹手术的时间,并对数据进行了分析。研究包括 481 名患者,其中 440 名(91.48%)为男性。在这些患者中,143人(29.73%)接受了开腹手术,其余338人则非手术出院。在 143 例开腹手术中,67 例(46.85%)为急诊,91 例(63.63%)在 4 小时内(包括急诊开腹手术),115 例(80.42%)在 8 小时内,126 例(88.11%)在 12 小时内,137 例(95.80%)在 24 小时内,141 例(98.60%)在 48 小时内。无症状的穿透性前腹部刀伤患者无需开腹手术,可在观察 48 小时后出院,腹内损伤的漏诊风险较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India that considers for publication articles in all fields of surgery. Issues are published bimonthly in the months of February, April, June, August, October and December. The journal publishes Original article, Point of technique, Review article, Case report, Letter to editor, Teachers and surgeons from the past - A short (up to 500 words) bio sketch of a revered teacher or surgeon whom you hold in esteem and Images in surgery, surgical pathology, and surgical radiology. A trusted resource for peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery Provides a forum for surgeons in India and abroad to exchange ideas and advance the art of surgery The official publication of the Association of Surgeons of India 92% of authors who answered a survey reported that they would definitely publish or probably publish in the journal again The Indian Journal of Surgery offers peer-reviewed coverage of all types of surgery. The Journal publishes Original articles, Points of technique, Review articles, Case reports, Letters, Images and brief biographies of influential teachers and surgeons. The Journal spans General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Neurosurgery, Plastic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Rural Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Urology, Surgical Oncology, Radiology, Anaesthesia, Trauma Services, Minimal Access Surgery, Endocrine Surgery, GI Surgery, ENT, Colorectal Surgery, surgical practice and research. The Journal provides a forum for surgeons from India and abroad to exchange ideas, to propagate the advancement of science and the art of surgery and to promote friendship among surgeons in India and abroad. This has been a trusted platform for surgons in communicating up-to-date scientific informeation to the community.
期刊最新文献
‘Mid-term Reflections of the President’—Charting Progress and Future Directions for the Association of Surgeons of India Clinico-Radiological Features of Acute and Chronic Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion (SMAO) Utilizing Hysteroscopic Mesh Resection for Presacral Mesh Infection Following Sacrocolpopexy Bleeding Jejunal Diverticula: Always a Timely Reminder Execution of Ipsilateral Radical Tonsillectomy and Tongue Base Mucosal Wedge Biopsy with Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) in the Setting of Carcinoma Unknown Primary (CUP): Insights into Surgical Techniques and Instrumentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1