Professionals' knowledge, skills and confidence on using the best practices for spinal cord injury physical activity counseling in Canada and the Netherlands.

Laura Kuipers,Trynke Hoekstra,,Femke Hoekstra
{"title":"Professionals' knowledge, skills and confidence on using the best practices for spinal cord injury physical activity counseling in Canada and the Netherlands.","authors":"Laura Kuipers,Trynke Hoekstra,,Femke Hoekstra","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2391595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nTo improve physical activity (PA) participation in people with spinal cord injury (SCI), an international panel co-created theory- and evidence-based best practices for SCI PA counseling. This study aimed to identify and compare Canadian and Dutch counselors' knowledge, skills, and confidence in using these best practices.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAn online survey was conducted in Canada and the Netherlands. Respondents were included if they worked or volunteered as exercise/lifestyle counselor, recreation therapist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, or peer mentor and were planning to provide counseling in the next 12 months. Chi-square tests, t-tests and linear regression analyses were used to compare groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nCanadian (n = 45) and Dutch respondents (n = 41) had different expertise, with the majority of Canadians working as therapeutic recreation therapist and the majority of Dutch respondents working as PA/lifestyle counselor. In both countries, respondents scored relatively high on their knowledge, skills, and confidence in using the best practices on how to have a conversation and what to discuss during a conversation. Dutch respondents scored slightly higher in their confidence for using best practices about building rapport, motivational interviewing, and tailoring the support (p = 0.05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe generally high counseling skills reported by Canadian and Dutch respondents may be due to the history of SCI-specific PA promotion projects conducted in both countries. These survey findings were used to inform the development of evidence-based training modules on SCI PA counseling. This study may inspire cross-country collaboration and exchange to optimize the organization and delivery of PA counseling services for adults with SCI.","PeriodicalId":501560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT To improve physical activity (PA) participation in people with spinal cord injury (SCI), an international panel co-created theory- and evidence-based best practices for SCI PA counseling. This study aimed to identify and compare Canadian and Dutch counselors' knowledge, skills, and confidence in using these best practices. METHODS An online survey was conducted in Canada and the Netherlands. Respondents were included if they worked or volunteered as exercise/lifestyle counselor, recreation therapist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, or peer mentor and were planning to provide counseling in the next 12 months. Chi-square tests, t-tests and linear regression analyses were used to compare groups. RESULTS Canadian (n = 45) and Dutch respondents (n = 41) had different expertise, with the majority of Canadians working as therapeutic recreation therapist and the majority of Dutch respondents working as PA/lifestyle counselor. In both countries, respondents scored relatively high on their knowledge, skills, and confidence in using the best practices on how to have a conversation and what to discuss during a conversation. Dutch respondents scored slightly higher in their confidence for using best practices about building rapport, motivational interviewing, and tailoring the support (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The generally high counseling skills reported by Canadian and Dutch respondents may be due to the history of SCI-specific PA promotion projects conducted in both countries. These survey findings were used to inform the development of evidence-based training modules on SCI PA counseling. This study may inspire cross-country collaboration and exchange to optimize the organization and delivery of PA counseling services for adults with SCI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大和荷兰专业人员在使用脊髓损伤体育活动咨询最佳实践方面的知识、技能和信心。
摘要为了提高脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的体育锻炼(PA)参与率,一个国际小组共同制定了脊髓损伤体育锻炼咨询的理论和循证最佳实践。本研究旨在确定并比较加拿大和荷兰咨询师在使用这些最佳实践方面的知识、技能和信心。如果受访者曾担任或志愿担任运动/生活方式顾问、娱乐治疗师、物理治疗师、职业治疗师或同伴指导员,并计划在未来 12 个月内提供咨询服务,则将其纳入调查范围。结果加拿大受访者(n = 45)和荷兰受访者(n = 41)具有不同的专业技能,其中大多数加拿大人从事治疗性娱乐治疗师的工作,而大多数荷兰受访者从事运动疗法/生活方式顾问的工作。这两个国家的受访者在如何进行对话以及对话过程中讨论哪些内容方面的知识、技能和信心得分都相对较高。结论加拿大和荷兰的受访者报告的咨询技能普遍较高,这可能是因为这两个国家都曾开展过针对 SCI 的运动促进项目。这些调查结果可用于开发以证据为基础的 SCI PA 咨询培训模块。这项研究可能会激励跨国合作与交流,以优化针对患有 SCI 的成人的 PA 咨询服务的组织和提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Professionals' knowledge, skills and confidence on using the best practices for spinal cord injury physical activity counseling in Canada and the Netherlands. Differential relationships between physical activity and pain phenotypes in individuals with spinal cord injury. Development and validation of a risk nomogram to estimate risk of hyponatremia after spinal cord injury: A retrospective single-center study. Harnessing citizen science to improve community accessibility: Project Sidewalk. A systematic review of validity and reliability assessment of measuring balance and walking at the level of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1