How did the elephant cross the fence? Electric fence crossing by elephants in Udawalawe, Sri Lanka

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Animal Conservation Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1111/acv.12982
A. D. G. Ranjeewa, R. J. Thomas, D. K. Weerakoon, G. H. N. A. Sandanayake, P. Fernando
{"title":"How did the elephant cross the fence? Electric fence crossing by elephants in Udawalawe, Sri Lanka","authors":"A. D. G. Ranjeewa, R. J. Thomas, D. K. Weerakoon, G. H. N. A. Sandanayake, P. Fernando","doi":"10.1111/acv.12982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electric fences are widely used in human–elephant conflict mitigation. However, elephants constantly challenge and overcome fences, which is a growing concern. We studied how elephants crossed the perimeter electric fence around the Udawalawe National Park (UWNP), Sri Lanka. Using camera traps, we monitored 18 fence posts and an open gate in the fence over 605 days from 2016 to 2019. Photographs of 3097 fence crossings were analysed to obtain demographic data for fence crossing elephants, crossing methods, and the daily and seasonal timing of fence crossing. We identified 77 adult males and 12 adult females that crossed the fence, which represent about 17% of the adult elephants in UWNP. Most of the crossings were through the open gate at night. Elephants used a variety of crossing methods, comprised of crossing at the open gate, at previously toppled posts, by crashing through wires and stepping over wires, as well as by using the trunk or forefeet to topple posts. Fence voltage was not a determinant of fence crossing. The frequency and timing of fence crossings varied between locations with later exits and less time spent outside, at crossing points bordering human dominated areas. Our results emphasis on the importance of taking into account the problem solving abilities of elephants in fence design and location, such as energising fence posts and constructing exclosure fences at the boundaries of crop fields and settlements, in employing electric fences to mitigate human‐elephant conflict.","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric fences are widely used in human–elephant conflict mitigation. However, elephants constantly challenge and overcome fences, which is a growing concern. We studied how elephants crossed the perimeter electric fence around the Udawalawe National Park (UWNP), Sri Lanka. Using camera traps, we monitored 18 fence posts and an open gate in the fence over 605 days from 2016 to 2019. Photographs of 3097 fence crossings were analysed to obtain demographic data for fence crossing elephants, crossing methods, and the daily and seasonal timing of fence crossing. We identified 77 adult males and 12 adult females that crossed the fence, which represent about 17% of the adult elephants in UWNP. Most of the crossings were through the open gate at night. Elephants used a variety of crossing methods, comprised of crossing at the open gate, at previously toppled posts, by crashing through wires and stepping over wires, as well as by using the trunk or forefeet to topple posts. Fence voltage was not a determinant of fence crossing. The frequency and timing of fence crossings varied between locations with later exits and less time spent outside, at crossing points bordering human dominated areas. Our results emphasis on the importance of taking into account the problem solving abilities of elephants in fence design and location, such as energising fence posts and constructing exclosure fences at the boundaries of crop fields and settlements, in employing electric fences to mitigate human‐elephant conflict.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大象是如何穿越栅栏的?斯里兰卡乌达瓦拉维的大象穿越电网
电栅栏被广泛用于缓解人象冲突。然而,大象不断挑战和跨越电网,这一点日益受到关注。我们研究了大象如何穿越斯里兰卡乌达瓦拉维国家公园(UWNP)周围的电栅栏。在 2016 年至 2019 年的 605 天里,我们使用相机陷阱监测了围栏中的 18 个栅栏柱和一个敞开的大门。我们对 3097 次穿越栅栏的照片进行了分析,以获得穿越栅栏的大象的人口统计学数据、穿越方法以及穿越栅栏的每日和季节性时间。我们发现有 77 头成年雄象和 12 头成年雌象越过围栏,约占华盛顿国家公园成年大象的 17%。大多数穿越都是在夜间通过敞开的大门。大象穿越围栏的方法多种多样,包括在敞开的大门处穿越、在先前被推倒的柱子上穿越、撞开电线和跨过电线,以及用躯干或前足推倒柱子。栅栏电压不是决定栅栏穿越的因素。越过栅栏的频率和时间在不同地点有所不同,在与人类统治区接壤的越过点,越过栅栏的时间较晚,在户外逗留的时间较短。我们的研究结果强调,在使用电栅栏缓解人象冲突时,必须在栅栏的设计和选址方面考虑到大象解决问题的能力,例如给栅栏柱通电以及在农田和定居点的边界修建围栏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Perilous state of critically endangered Northwest African cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus hecki) across the Sudano‐Sahel Human impact and environmental conditions lead to a mass mortality event of David's Myotis (Myotis davidii) in Mongolia Assessing population viability and management strategies for species recovery of the critically endangered Puerto Rican parrot Understanding early reproductive failure in turtles and tortoises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1