Saul J. Cowen, Sean James Buckley, Andrew Crawford, Leonie Monks, Katherine Moseby, Natasha M. Robinson
<p>Conservation translocations (hereafter ‘translocations’) have long been regarded as an important management tool for the recovery of species threatened with extinction, and their use continues to grow (Armstrong et al. <span>2019</span>). Translocations can be inspirational and may stimulate fruitful and effective partnerships (Parker <span>2008</span>; Fischer et al. <span>2023</span>), but can also be a potential source of conflict (Consorte-McCrea et al. <span>2022</span>; Glikman et al. <span>2023</span>). Furthermore, translocations may entail high financial costs (Berger-Tal et al. <span>2020</span>), those involving animals may be highly stressful (Dickens et al. <span>2010</span>), and statistically have a high chance of failure (Morris et al. <span>2021</span>). To paraphrase Axel Moehrenschlager (Chair of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group [CTSG]), the best translocation is one that does not need to happen (Moehrenschlager <span>2021</span>). Unfortunately, the reality for many imperilled species is that threat abatement alone is insufficient to reverse their fortunes or to restore ecosystem function (Seddon <span>2010</span>, <span>2023</span>). As an increasing number of species are considered to be threatened with extinction every year (IUCN <span>2024</span>), the importance of translocations will likely continue to grow. Therefore, it is critical that those undertaking translocations not only follow but continue to push the boundaries of ‘best practice’, including communicating what they have learned (Batson et al. <span>2015</span>; Maschinski et al. <span>2023</span>). There is a wealth of peer-reviewed literature (Resende et al. <span>2020</span>) in journals, such as <i>Animal Conservation</i>, along with an increasing number of books in the field of reintroduction biology, which provide a valuable accumulation of experience and knowledge.</p><p>Conferences too can play an important role in the process of knowledge-sharing. This special issue of <i>Animal Conservation</i> stems from the most recent International Conservation Translocation Conference (ICTC), held in Fremantle, Western Australia in November 2023. Organised on behalf of the CTSG, its theme was ‘Learning from the Past, Adapting to the Future’ and was attended by 300 delegates from six continents, with presentations on a diverse range of taxa, including vertebrates, invertebrates and plants. The articles in this special issue were originally presented at the ICTC and tackle some of the key themes in current reintroduction biology, and highlight their complexity on multiple taxa and landscapes. In this editorial, we provide an overview of the key aims and findings of the articles published in this special issue, as well as how they contribute to developing and adapting conservation translocations to meet the present and future challenges in species and ecosystem restoration.</p><p>In their article, Parlato et al. (<span>2024</span>) illustrat
{"title":"Learning From the Past, Adapting to the Future: Experimental Approaches in Conservation Translocations","authors":"Saul J. Cowen, Sean James Buckley, Andrew Crawford, Leonie Monks, Katherine Moseby, Natasha M. Robinson","doi":"10.1111/acv.13020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.13020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conservation translocations (hereafter ‘translocations’) have long been regarded as an important management tool for the recovery of species threatened with extinction, and their use continues to grow (Armstrong et al. <span>2019</span>). Translocations can be inspirational and may stimulate fruitful and effective partnerships (Parker <span>2008</span>; Fischer et al. <span>2023</span>), but can also be a potential source of conflict (Consorte-McCrea et al. <span>2022</span>; Glikman et al. <span>2023</span>). Furthermore, translocations may entail high financial costs (Berger-Tal et al. <span>2020</span>), those involving animals may be highly stressful (Dickens et al. <span>2010</span>), and statistically have a high chance of failure (Morris et al. <span>2021</span>). To paraphrase Axel Moehrenschlager (Chair of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group [CTSG]), the best translocation is one that does not need to happen (Moehrenschlager <span>2021</span>). Unfortunately, the reality for many imperilled species is that threat abatement alone is insufficient to reverse their fortunes or to restore ecosystem function (Seddon <span>2010</span>, <span>2023</span>). As an increasing number of species are considered to be threatened with extinction every year (IUCN <span>2024</span>), the importance of translocations will likely continue to grow. Therefore, it is critical that those undertaking translocations not only follow but continue to push the boundaries of ‘best practice’, including communicating what they have learned (Batson et al. <span>2015</span>; Maschinski et al. <span>2023</span>). There is a wealth of peer-reviewed literature (Resende et al. <span>2020</span>) in journals, such as <i>Animal Conservation</i>, along with an increasing number of books in the field of reintroduction biology, which provide a valuable accumulation of experience and knowledge.</p><p>Conferences too can play an important role in the process of knowledge-sharing. This special issue of <i>Animal Conservation</i> stems from the most recent International Conservation Translocation Conference (ICTC), held in Fremantle, Western Australia in November 2023. Organised on behalf of the CTSG, its theme was ‘Learning from the Past, Adapting to the Future’ and was attended by 300 delegates from six continents, with presentations on a diverse range of taxa, including vertebrates, invertebrates and plants. The articles in this special issue were originally presented at the ICTC and tackle some of the key themes in current reintroduction biology, and highlight their complexity on multiple taxa and landscapes. In this editorial, we provide an overview of the key aims and findings of the articles published in this special issue, as well as how they contribute to developing and adapting conservation translocations to meet the present and future challenges in species and ecosystem restoration.</p><p>In their article, Parlato et al. (<span>2024</span>) illustrat","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.13020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143521849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Translocation outcomes in connected habitats are often uncertain, as individuals dispersing outside managed areas are exposed to threats. Post-release monitoring can reduce uncertainty by revealing how dispersal and habitat selection influences establishment and population growth which inform future translocations. We undertook post-release monitoring to identify habitat selection patterns following a translocation of toutouwai (North Island robin, Petroica longipes) to a large, contiguous forest habitat. Post-release monitoring aimed to estimate survival, dispersal, and territory establishment to inform management decisions and future release site selection. We created species distribution models using monitoring data to identify differences in habitat selection during the post-release dispersal and territory establishment phases. Toutouwai dispersed across 1312 ha but established territories within only 113 ha and 1 km from the release location. Site fidelity was higher than predicted, and there was no difference in dispersal or habitat selection across demographic groups. Critically, high site fidelity suggested that the extent of managed habitat was sufficient to protect dispersing individuals. Habitat selection preferences were stronger during territory establishment and were associated with lower slopes, higher water deficit and proximity to water reservoirs. Species distribution modelling allowed for predictions of high-quality core habitat where dispersal and territory establishment were more likely, resulting in targeted management to improve population growth. Our results show that initial dispersal in connected habitats may be much larger than suggested by territory data alone, and that management may need to protect larger areas to support successful establishment. We demonstrate how effective post-release monitoring can inform predictions of habitat quality and dispersal and guide management actions to improve translocations outcomes.
{"title":"Understanding Post-Release Dispersal and Habitat Selection Helps Refine Management of Translocated Populations","authors":"Zoe Stone, Doug Armstrong, Kevin Parker","doi":"10.1111/acv.13019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.13019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Translocation outcomes in connected habitats are often uncertain, as individuals dispersing outside managed areas are exposed to threats. Post-release monitoring can reduce uncertainty by revealing how dispersal and habitat selection influences establishment and population growth which inform future translocations. We undertook post-release monitoring to identify habitat selection patterns following a translocation of toutouwai (North Island robin, <i>Petroica longipes</i>) to a large, contiguous forest habitat. Post-release monitoring aimed to estimate survival, dispersal, and territory establishment to inform management decisions and future release site selection. We created species distribution models using monitoring data to identify differences in habitat selection during the post-release dispersal and territory establishment phases. Toutouwai dispersed across 1312 ha but established territories within only 113 ha and 1 km from the release location. Site fidelity was higher than predicted, and there was no difference in dispersal or habitat selection across demographic groups. Critically, high site fidelity suggested that the extent of managed habitat was sufficient to protect dispersing individuals. Habitat selection preferences were stronger during territory establishment and were associated with lower slopes, higher water deficit and proximity to water reservoirs. Species distribution modelling allowed for predictions of high-quality core habitat where dispersal and territory establishment were more likely, resulting in targeted management to improve population growth. Our results show that initial dispersal in connected habitats may be much larger than suggested by territory data alone, and that management may need to protect larger areas to support successful establishment. We demonstrate how effective post-release monitoring can inform predictions of habitat quality and dispersal and guide management actions to improve translocations outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"28 1","pages":"156-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.13019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143521819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}