<p>In countries of the European Union and Associated Members, bats are subject to strict legal protection (the Habitats Directive, Council Directive 92/43/EEC (Council of Europe. <span>1979</span>)). This rigorous protection was prompted by a significant decline in bat populations across Europe during the second half of the 20th century (Stebbings <span>1988</span>; Hutson et al. <span>2001</span>). Modern European bat conservation approaches include habitat protection and management (Kyheröinen et al. <span>2019</span>), protection of existing roosts, artificial roosting solutions (Marnell and Presetnik <span>2010</span>; Mitchell-Jones et al. <span>2007</span>), mitigation of infrastructure impacts (Rodrigues et al. <span>2015</span>; Matthews et al. <span>2024</span>) and rehabilitation and rescue efforts.</p><p>Bat rescue initiatives in Ukraine began in 1999 in Kyiv (Golenko <span>2010</span>) and Kharkiv cities (Vlaschenko <span>1999</span>). One of the key challenges for bat rescue and rehabilitation in Ukraine (and the whole of Eastern Europe) is the harsh winter climate, which prevents immediate release and requires maintaining bats in artificial hibernation conditions until spring. From the beginning, particularly in Kharkiv, the demand for bat rescue was high (hundreds of bats). This number steadily increased, surpassing 1000 individuals by 2011. In response to this growing need, the Bat Rehabilitation Center of Feldman Ecopark (Kharkiv) was established in 2013 (Vlaschenko and Prylutska <span>2018</span>). Since 2017, groups of hundreds of bats have been rescued from other cities, with numbers exceeding 2000–2500 per annum. Further, in 2021 the project expanded into the Ukrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center (UBRC), scaling up the best bat rehabilitation practices nationwide. The need for specialised bat rehabilitation centres extend beyond Ukraine, with similar initiatives also established in other Eastern European countries (e.g., Shpak <span>2023</span>).</p><p>The UBRC team has implemented an advanced, country-wide monitoring system for bat rescues and data collection (e.g., Hukov et al. <span>2020</span>; Vlaschenko, Hukov, et al. <span>2023</span>; Prylutska et al. <span>2023</span>). The central facilities in Kharkiv are equipped with an operational contact centre (helpline), specialised infrastructure for summer and winter bat rehabilitation (Vlaschenko and Prylutska <span>2018</span>), and a highly trained team of biologists and veterinarians. This central system is further supported by a network of local rehabilitation centres which are based in zoos, universities, natural history museums, animal rescue centres and national parks, and are reinforced by volunteers. Despite the established infrastructure for bat rescue in the country, the number of animals requiring rescue continues to rise. This upward trend culminated in a record number of bat rescues during the winter season of 2023–2024, when 6437 bats were rescued (Shulenko et
然而,大多数最丰富的蝙蝠记录都与预制混凝土标准化多层建筑有关(图5),这些建筑在前苏联广泛建造,并延伸到前华沙条约地区的西部边界。这些混凝土预制建筑在20世纪70年代末和80年代激增,当时它们开始主导城区(图5)甚至整个小城镇。随着苏联体制的衰落,建筑质量恶化,导致空洞和未密封的裂缝增加,这反过来又为蝙蝠提供了更多的栖息机会。大多数继承了这类建筑的中欧国家已经完成了翻新和隔热的计划(Jamska 2014; Deleva et al. 2025)。因此,许多这些建筑物要么失去了作为蝙蝠栖息的适宜性,要么被蝙蝠箱取代了栖息空间(Jamska 2014)。相比之下,乌克兰尚未在国家一级发起类似的方案。正在进行的全面战争使情况进一步复杂化,造成全国数千座建筑物的破坏或损坏(Vlaschenko, Shulenko, et al. 2023)。这些建筑没有修复的时间越长,它们被蝙蝠占据的可能性就越大,因为它们继续提供合适的栖息机会。我们假设,乌克兰的多层混凝土建筑区居住着大量的蝙蝠,这些建筑建于苏联晚期,有30-40年没有翻修过。我们认为这些建筑物中的蝙蝠种群(在全国范围内)可能在数十万到数百万之间。这些建筑和地区已成为这些蝙蝠生命周期中不可或缺的一部分,当地种群表现出高水平的栖息地保真度(Vlaschenko et al. 2020)。我们强调迫切需要采取有针对性的保护措施,以保护乌克兰的城市蝙蝠种群。我们呼吁包括政府主管部门、城市规划者和国际捐助者在内的利益攸关方,确保在没有事先进行环境评估的情况下,不分配用于多层建筑翻新和隔热的资金。这些评估应确定和保护或减轻对蝙蝠栖息地点的影响。此外,必须支持建筑行业内的教育计划,以提高对蝙蝠的认识和保护蝙蝠的法律要求。如果不采取这些措施,在接下来的十年里,我们可能会消灭成千上万只蝙蝠的庇护所,这些蝙蝠是最近形成的城市蝙蝠种群。概念:a.v., a.s., m.y., V.B., k.z., a.p., K.K.资金获取:a.v., a.p., K.K., a.s., m.y., V.B.蝙蝠救援和康复活动:所有共同作者都参与或参与了实际的蝙蝠救援和康复工作。写作-初稿:A.V.审查和编辑:所有共同作者审查并批准了最终稿件。
{"title":"Urban Bat Rescue Crisis in Eastern Europe: A New Challenge for Bat Conservation","authors":"Anton Vlaschenko, Alona Shulenko, Maryna Yerofeieva, Valeriia Bohodist, Kateryna Zemliana, Andrii Kulynych, Anzhelika But, Oleksii Parfilov, Veronika Putiatina, Alona Prylutska, Kseniia Kravchenko","doi":"10.1111/acv.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In countries of the European Union and Associated Members, bats are subject to strict legal protection (the Habitats Directive, Council Directive 92/43/EEC (Council of Europe. <span>1979</span>)). This rigorous protection was prompted by a significant decline in bat populations across Europe during the second half of the 20th century (Stebbings <span>1988</span>; Hutson et al. <span>2001</span>). Modern European bat conservation approaches include habitat protection and management (Kyheröinen et al. <span>2019</span>), protection of existing roosts, artificial roosting solutions (Marnell and Presetnik <span>2010</span>; Mitchell-Jones et al. <span>2007</span>), mitigation of infrastructure impacts (Rodrigues et al. <span>2015</span>; Matthews et al. <span>2024</span>) and rehabilitation and rescue efforts.</p><p>Bat rescue initiatives in Ukraine began in 1999 in Kyiv (Golenko <span>2010</span>) and Kharkiv cities (Vlaschenko <span>1999</span>). One of the key challenges for bat rescue and rehabilitation in Ukraine (and the whole of Eastern Europe) is the harsh winter climate, which prevents immediate release and requires maintaining bats in artificial hibernation conditions until spring. From the beginning, particularly in Kharkiv, the demand for bat rescue was high (hundreds of bats). This number steadily increased, surpassing 1000 individuals by 2011. In response to this growing need, the Bat Rehabilitation Center of Feldman Ecopark (Kharkiv) was established in 2013 (Vlaschenko and Prylutska <span>2018</span>). Since 2017, groups of hundreds of bats have been rescued from other cities, with numbers exceeding 2000–2500 per annum. Further, in 2021 the project expanded into the Ukrainian Bat Rehabilitation Center (UBRC), scaling up the best bat rehabilitation practices nationwide. The need for specialised bat rehabilitation centres extend beyond Ukraine, with similar initiatives also established in other Eastern European countries (e.g., Shpak <span>2023</span>).</p><p>The UBRC team has implemented an advanced, country-wide monitoring system for bat rescues and data collection (e.g., Hukov et al. <span>2020</span>; Vlaschenko, Hukov, et al. <span>2023</span>; Prylutska et al. <span>2023</span>). The central facilities in Kharkiv are equipped with an operational contact centre (helpline), specialised infrastructure for summer and winter bat rehabilitation (Vlaschenko and Prylutska <span>2018</span>), and a highly trained team of biologists and veterinarians. This central system is further supported by a network of local rehabilitation centres which are based in zoos, universities, natural history museums, animal rescue centres and national parks, and are reinforced by volunteers. Despite the established infrastructure for bat rescue in the country, the number of animals requiring rescue continues to rise. This upward trend culminated in a record number of bat rescues during the winter season of 2023–2024, when 6437 bats were rescued (Shulenko et","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"28 5","pages":"611-615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145385111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Luca Luiselli, Gift Simon Demaya, Mathias Behangana, John Sebit Benansio, Achilles Byaruhanga, Andrew D. Walde
The global refugee crisis is one of the most pressing humanitarian emergencies of our time. According to the United Nations, in 2022, over 100 million people were forcibly displaced from their homes worldwide (UNHCR 2024; https://www.unhcr.org/, last accessed on January 26, 2025). This unprecedented movement of people poses immense challenges across many of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which are intended to address climate change and the preservation of oceans and forests (United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals, last accessed on January 26, 2025). Climate change is the number one global crisis which is leading to conflicts between people and even nations. However, the refugee crisis is systematically toppling the SDGs. While the human tragedy of displacement rightfully commands global attention, its less acknowledged but critical implications for SDG 15—the preservation of biodiversity—demand urgent action.
Globally, we are witnessing a refugee crisis, with refugee populations more than doubling in the past 10 years (UNHCR 2024; https://www.unhcr.org/, last accessed on January 26, 2025). In Africa, Uganda hosts the largest number of refugees with about 1.5 million persons in 2023 (https://data.unhcr.org/en/country/uga, last accessed on January 31, 2025), with the overall refugee population in the region rapidly expanding from 1.8 million in 2012 to over 5.5 million in early 2023 (Kyeyune 2023). It is estimated that there are 17,500 new refugees entering Uganda daily (Kyeyune 2023). The consequences to the biodiversity of these regions are unprecedented and difficult to comprehend unless witnessed in person. Many of the settlements hosting these refugees are concentrated along rivers in the northern region, particularly near the Nile River, which is a critical artery of life and biodiversity. However, insufficient funding for basic necessities, including underfunding by the UN agencies (Kyeyune 2023) for food and cooking fuel, has led to a cascade of environmental degradation in the areas where refugee settlements are formed (e.g., Behangana, Katumba, et al. 2024; Behangana, Babyesiza, et al. 2024; Walde et al. 2024). This is amplified by the fact that most refugee settlements tend to become permanent over time and continue to increase in population size: for instance, according to the UNHCR data, in the West Nile region of Uganda, daily arrivals average at 191 people from South Sudan, and in western Uganda over 242 from the Democratic Republic of Congo, rising to over 400 and 600 per day, respectively, in the periods of hottest crisis (https://data.unhcr.org/en/dataviz/68?sv=0&geo=220, last accessed on January 28, 2025). Associated with these settlements, there is large scale removal of all vegetation types for cooking fires and constructing huts for shelter, resulting in a denuded landscape for at least 3–15 km aroun
全球难民危机是我们时代最紧迫的人道主义紧急情况之一。据联合国统计,2022年,全球有超过1亿人被迫离开家园。(联合国难民署2024;https://www.unhcr.org/,最后一次访问时间为2025年1月26日)这种前所未有的人口流动给旨在应对气候变化和保护海洋和森林的17项联合国可持续发展目标中的许多目标带来了巨大挑战。https://sdgs.un.org/goals,最后一次访问是在2025年1月26日)。气候变化是导致人与人之间甚至国家之间冲突的头号全球危机。然而,难民危机正在系统性地颠覆可持续发展目标。虽然流离失所的人类悲剧理应引起全球关注,但它对可持续发展目标15(保护生物多样性)的影响虽不为人所知,但却至关重要,需要采取紧急行动。在全球范围内,我们正在目睹一场难民危机,难民人口在过去十年中增加了一倍多(UNHCR 2024; https://www.unhcr.org/,最后一次访问时间为2025年1月26日)。在非洲,乌干达收容的难民人数最多,2023年约有150万人(https://data.unhcr.org/en/country/uga,最后一次访问时间为2025年1月31日),该地区的难民总人数从2012年的180万迅速增加到2023年初的550多万(Kyeyune 2023)。据估计,每天有17,500名新难民进入乌干达(Kyeyune 2023)。对这些地区生物多样性的影响是前所未有的,除非亲眼目睹,否则很难理解。许多收容这些难民的定居点集中在北部地区的河流沿岸,特别是靠近尼罗河,这是生命和生物多样性的重要动脉。然而,基本必需品的资金不足,包括联合国机构(Kyeyune 2023)对食物和烹饪燃料的资金不足,导致难民定居点地区的环境恶化(例如,Behangana, Katumba, et al. 2024; Behangana, Babyesiza, et al. 2024; Walde et al. 2024)。随着时间的推移,大多数难民定居点往往成为永久性定居点,人口规模继续增加,这一事实使情况更加严重:例如,根据联合国难民署的数据,在乌干达的西尼罗河地区,平均每天有191人来自南苏丹,超过242人来自刚果民主共和国,在最严重的危机时期,每天分别增加到400人和600人(https://data.unhcr.org/en/dataviz/68?sv=0&geo=220,最后一次访问时间为2025年1月28日)。与这些定居点相关的是,为了生火做饭和建造棚屋作为住所,所有类型的植被都被大规模移除,导致这些营地周围至少3-15公里的土地被光秃秃的。丛林肉的消费和/或贸易也在迅速增长,尼罗河本身的健康状况正在恶化,河岸的不稳定和水质的下降威胁着生态系统和社区(L. Luiselli, G.S. Demaya, M. Behangana, J.S. Benansio和a . Byaruhanga未发表的数据)。世界上超过50%的海龟面临灭绝的威胁(Rhodin et al. 2018),栖息地的丧失和过度开发是导致海龟数量减少的主要原因(Stanford et al. 2020)。几种海龟处于极度濒危状态,濒临灭绝(Stanford et al. 2020)。其中一个物种是努比亚扑壳龟,它被列为世界上最濒危的25只海龟之一(海龟保护联盟2018年)。努比亚扁壳曾经在非洲从加纳西部到南苏丹的大草原河流中广泛分布,现在只在南苏丹和乌干达北部之间的一小块地区发现(Demaya et al. 2023; Luiselli et al. 2024)。更准确地说,这个物种在50多年的时间里没有被科学记载,最近在白尼罗河50公里长的一段沿岸被重新发现(Demaya et al. 2019a, 2019b; Luiselli et al. 2022)。虽然该物种的逐渐灭绝过程不是难民危机的结果,而是其他原因,特别是雌性巢穴保真度的物种行为,允许猎人和渔民容易收集雌性和卵(Demaya et al. 2023),现在,该物种的最后栖息地是乌干达北部的难民定居点附近(Luiselli et al. 2024;Walde et al. 2024),这一事实使这种极度濒危的物种坚持生存(Walde et al. 2024)。Demaya等人(2023)提供的建模数据强调了这一点,在大地理范围内,由于过度捕捞,其大部分范围内的种群崩溃和灭绝似乎是相关的。 卢卡·路易斯利提出了这个想法,参与了实地调查并起草了手稿;Gift Simon Demaya, Mathias Behangana, John Sebit Benansio和Achilles Byaruhanga进行了实地调查并审查了早期草案;安德鲁·d·瓦尔德(Andrew D. Walde)参与起草了初稿,并审查了修订稿。所有作者都认可了最终稿。
{"title":"When Crisis Meets Conservation: Safeguarding Biodiversity Amid the Refugee Emergency","authors":"Luca Luiselli, Gift Simon Demaya, Mathias Behangana, John Sebit Benansio, Achilles Byaruhanga, Andrew D. Walde","doi":"10.1111/acv.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The global refugee crisis is one of the most pressing humanitarian emergencies of our time. According to the United Nations, in 2022, over 100 million people were forcibly displaced from their homes worldwide (UNHCR 2024; https://www.unhcr.org/, last accessed on January 26, 2025). This unprecedented movement of people poses immense challenges across many of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which are intended to address climate change and the preservation of oceans and forests (United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals, last accessed on January 26, 2025). Climate change is the number one global crisis which is leading to conflicts between people and even nations. However, the refugee crisis is systematically toppling the SDGs. While the human tragedy of displacement rightfully commands global attention, its less acknowledged but critical implications for SDG 15—<i>the preservation of biodiversity</i>—demand urgent action.</p><p>Globally, we are witnessing a refugee crisis, with refugee populations more than doubling in the past 10 years (UNHCR 2024; https://www.unhcr.org/, last accessed on January 26, 2025). In Africa, Uganda hosts the largest number of refugees with about 1.5 million persons in 2023 (https://data.unhcr.org/en/country/uga, last accessed on January 31, 2025), with the overall refugee population in the region rapidly expanding from 1.8 million in 2012 to over 5.5 million in early 2023 (Kyeyune <span>2023</span>). It is estimated that there are 17,500 new refugees entering Uganda daily (Kyeyune <span>2023</span>). The consequences to the biodiversity of these regions are unprecedented and difficult to comprehend unless witnessed in person. Many of the settlements hosting these refugees are concentrated along rivers in the northern region, particularly near the Nile River, which is a critical artery of life and biodiversity. However, insufficient funding for basic necessities, including underfunding by the UN agencies (Kyeyune <span>2023</span>) for food and cooking fuel, has led to a cascade of environmental degradation in the areas where refugee settlements are formed (e.g., Behangana, Katumba, et al. <span>2024</span>; Behangana, Babyesiza, et al. <span>2024</span>; Walde et al. <span>2024</span>). This is amplified by the fact that most refugee settlements tend to become permanent over time and continue to increase in population size: for instance, according to the UNHCR data, in the West Nile region of Uganda, daily arrivals average at 191 people from South Sudan, and in western Uganda over 242 from the Democratic Republic of Congo, rising to over 400 and 600 per day, respectively, in the periods of hottest crisis (https://data.unhcr.org/en/dataviz/68?sv=0&geo=220, last accessed on January 28, 2025). Associated with these settlements, there is large scale removal of all vegetation types for cooking fires and constructing huts for shelter, resulting in a denuded landscape for at least 3–15 km aroun","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"28 5","pages":"616-618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145385135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}