Do Diagnostic Nerve Blocks Affect the Starting Dose of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for Spasticity? A Case-Control Study

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Toxins Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.3390/toxins16090388
Mirko Filippetti, Stefano Tamburin, Rita Di Censo, Roberto Aldegheri, Elisa Mantovani, Stefania Spina, Marco Battaglia, Alessio Baricich, Andrea Santamato, Nicola Smania, Alessandro Picelli
{"title":"Do Diagnostic Nerve Blocks Affect the Starting Dose of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for Spasticity? A Case-Control Study","authors":"Mirko Filippetti, Stefano Tamburin, Rita Di Censo, Roberto Aldegheri, Elisa Mantovani, Stefania Spina, Marco Battaglia, Alessio Baricich, Andrea Santamato, Nicola Smania, Alessandro Picelli","doi":"10.3390/toxins16090388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the aims of diagnostic nerve blocks is to identify the overactive muscles that lead to a specific spasticity pattern. However, to date, there is no evidence on how nerve blocks may affect botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) dose in patients with spasticity. This case-control study aims to assess the role of diagnostic nerve block in defining BoNT-A starting dose at first treatment. Patients with upper and lower limb spasticity treated for the first time with BoNT-A were retrospectively divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 43) was evaluated with clinical assessment and diagnostic nerve block; Group 2 (n = 56) underwent clinical assessment only. Group 1 was injected with higher BoNT-A doses in some muscles (i.e., flexor digitorum profundus, soleus), and received a higher BoNT-A cumulative dose with a larger number of injected muscles for some spasticity patterns (i.e., “clenched fist”, “flexed fingers”, “adducted thigh”). Diagnostic nerve block may help the clinician to optimize and personalize the BoNT-A dose since the first BoNT-A treatment.","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16090388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the aims of diagnostic nerve blocks is to identify the overactive muscles that lead to a specific spasticity pattern. However, to date, there is no evidence on how nerve blocks may affect botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) dose in patients with spasticity. This case-control study aims to assess the role of diagnostic nerve block in defining BoNT-A starting dose at first treatment. Patients with upper and lower limb spasticity treated for the first time with BoNT-A were retrospectively divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 43) was evaluated with clinical assessment and diagnostic nerve block; Group 2 (n = 56) underwent clinical assessment only. Group 1 was injected with higher BoNT-A doses in some muscles (i.e., flexor digitorum profundus, soleus), and received a higher BoNT-A cumulative dose with a larger number of injected muscles for some spasticity patterns (i.e., “clenched fist”, “flexed fingers”, “adducted thigh”). Diagnostic nerve block may help the clinician to optimize and personalize the BoNT-A dose since the first BoNT-A treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断性神经阻滞会影响治疗痉挛的 A 型肉毒杆菌神经毒素的起始剂量吗?病例对照研究
诊断性神经阻滞的目的之一是确定导致特定痉挛模式的过度活跃肌肉。然而,迄今为止还没有证据表明神经阻滞会如何影响痉挛患者的肉毒杆菌神经毒素-A(BoNT-A)剂量。本病例对照研究旨在评估诊断性神经阻滞在确定首次治疗的 BoNT-A 起始剂量方面的作用。研究人员回顾性地将首次接受 BoNT-A 治疗的上下肢痉挛患者分为两组:第一组(43 人)接受临床评估和诊断性神经阻滞;第二组(56 人)仅接受临床评估。第 1 组在某些肌肉(如屈指肌、比目鱼肌)注射了较高剂量的 BoNT-A,在某些痉挛模式(如 "握拳"、"屈指"、"大腿内收")中注射了较高剂量的 BoNT-A 累积剂量和较多的注射肌肉。诊断性神经阻滞可帮助临床医生优化和个性化首次 BoNT-A 治疗后的 BoNT-A 剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of Kunitz-Domain Anticoagulation Peptides Derived from Acinetobacter baumannii Exotoxin Protein F6W77. Description of Pegethrix niliensis sp. nov., a Novel Cyanobacterium from the Nile River Basin, Egypt: A Polyphasic Analysis and Comparative Study of Related Genera in the Oculatellales Order. Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Psoriasis-A Comprehensive Review. Elucidation of Medusozoan (Jellyfish) Venom Constituent Activities Using Constellation Pharmacology. Scoliidines: Neuroprotective Peptides in Solitary Scoliid Wasp Venoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1