Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim
{"title":"Genomic Face-Off: An In Silico Comparison of the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila","authors":"Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin, Md. Abu Bakar karim","doi":"10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.","PeriodicalId":10803,"journal":{"name":"Current Genomics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties. Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment. Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem. Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.
期刊介绍:
Current Genomics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides essential reading about the latest and most important developments in genome science and related fields of research. Systems biology, systems modeling, machine learning, network inference, bioinformatics, computational biology, epigenetics, single cell genomics, extracellular vesicles, quantitative biology, and synthetic biology for the study of evolution, development, maintenance, aging and that of human health, human diseases, clinical genomics and precision medicine are topics of particular interest. The journal covers plant genomics. The journal will not consider articles dealing with breeding and livestock.
Current Genomics publishes three types of articles including:
i) Research papers from internationally-recognized experts reporting on new and original data generated at the genome scale level. Position papers dealing with new or challenging methodological approaches, whether experimental or mathematical, are greatly welcome in this section.
ii) Authoritative and comprehensive full-length or mini reviews from widely recognized experts, covering the latest developments in genome science and related fields of research such as systems biology, statistics and machine learning, quantitative biology, and precision medicine. Proposals for mini-hot topics (2-3 review papers) and full hot topics (6-8 review papers) guest edited by internationally-recognized experts are welcome in this section. Hot topic proposals should not contain original data and they should contain articles originating from at least 2 different countries.
iii) Opinion papers from internationally recognized experts addressing contemporary questions and issues in the field of genome science and systems biology and basic and clinical research practices.