Microbial communities and high trophic level nematodes in protected argan soil show strong suppressive effect against Meloidogyne spp.

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03191
Tayeb Obidari, Maryem Wardi, Ilyas Filali Alaoui, Amina Braimi, Timothy Paulitz, Abdelhamid El Mousadik, El Hassan Mayad
{"title":"Microbial communities and high trophic level nematodes in protected argan soil show strong suppressive effect against Meloidogyne spp.","authors":"Tayeb Obidari, Maryem Wardi, Ilyas Filali Alaoui, Amina Braimi, Timothy Paulitz, Abdelhamid El Mousadik, El Hassan Mayad","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many agroecosystems, soil suppressiveness to root knot nematodes (RKN) is of great interest in defining the biological agents controlling population density, especially with growing concerns about the environmental and human health impacts of chemicals. In this study, we evaluated the suppressiveness to spp. in two land use soils: a protected argan soil from the Souss Massa National Park (SMNP), Morocco, and a conventional soil from an adjacent non-protected area. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, we characterized the fungal and bacterial communities in these soils for the first time. Nematodes belonging to different trophic guilds were also analyzed to further understand ecological factors that enable suppressive organisms to function and persist in the soil. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with tomato plants grown in untreated and autoclaved soils, each inoculated with 800 infective juveniles (J2). We found that omnivore-predator nematode abundance, structure, and maturity indices were higher in the protected soil indicating the presence of a well-structured soil food web and a stable ecosystem. After sixty-seven days, RKN population density and gall index were reduced by 79.6 % and 81.5 % in the protected soil, respectively. 50 % autoclaved protected soil was also suppressive, but not 75 % and totally autoclaved soil. In contrast, conventional soil amplified the RKN population by 1319 %. More than 6770 bacterial and 558 fungal taxa were detected in this study, with Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Mortierellales, Orbiliales, Agaricales, Diversisporales, and Pleosporales being consistently associated with RKN suppression. We found that fungal diversity was higher in SMNP-protected soil. In conclusion, soil protection enhances soil ecosystem resilience and that protected argan soils can serve as a valuable source of biological agents for the sustainable management of phytoparasitic nematodes.","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many agroecosystems, soil suppressiveness to root knot nematodes (RKN) is of great interest in defining the biological agents controlling population density, especially with growing concerns about the environmental and human health impacts of chemicals. In this study, we evaluated the suppressiveness to spp. in two land use soils: a protected argan soil from the Souss Massa National Park (SMNP), Morocco, and a conventional soil from an adjacent non-protected area. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, we characterized the fungal and bacterial communities in these soils for the first time. Nematodes belonging to different trophic guilds were also analyzed to further understand ecological factors that enable suppressive organisms to function and persist in the soil. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with tomato plants grown in untreated and autoclaved soils, each inoculated with 800 infective juveniles (J2). We found that omnivore-predator nematode abundance, structure, and maturity indices were higher in the protected soil indicating the presence of a well-structured soil food web and a stable ecosystem. After sixty-seven days, RKN population density and gall index were reduced by 79.6 % and 81.5 % in the protected soil, respectively. 50 % autoclaved protected soil was also suppressive, but not 75 % and totally autoclaved soil. In contrast, conventional soil amplified the RKN population by 1319 %. More than 6770 bacterial and 558 fungal taxa were detected in this study, with Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Mortierellales, Orbiliales, Agaricales, Diversisporales, and Pleosporales being consistently associated with RKN suppression. We found that fungal diversity was higher in SMNP-protected soil. In conclusion, soil protection enhances soil ecosystem resilience and that protected argan soils can serve as a valuable source of biological agents for the sustainable management of phytoparasitic nematodes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护性坚果土壤中的微生物群落和高营养级线虫对 Meloidogyne spp.有很强的抑制作用。
在许多农业生态系统中,土壤对根结线虫(RKN)的抑制性对于确定控制种群密度的生物媒介具有重要意义,尤其是在人们越来越关注化学物质对环境和人类健康的影响的情况下。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种土地利用土壤对根结线虫的抑制性:一种是摩洛哥 Souss Massa 国家公园(SMNP)的受保护坚果土壤,另一种是邻近非保护区的常规土壤。利用下一代测序(NGS)技术,我们首次确定了这些土壤中真菌和细菌群落的特征。我们还分析了属于不同营养行会的线虫,以进一步了解使抑制性生物在土壤中发挥作用并持续存在的生态因素。实验是在温室中进行的,番茄植株生长在未经处理和经过高压灭菌的土壤中,每株植株都接种了 800 株感染性幼虫(J2)。我们发现,在受保护的土壤中,杂食性捕食线虫的数量、结构和成熟指数都较高,这表明土壤中存在结构良好的食物网和稳定的生态系统。67 天后,保护土中 RKN 的种群密度和虫瘿指数分别降低了 79.6% 和 81.5%。经过 50% 高压灭菌处理的保护土也有抑制作用,但 75% 和完全高压灭菌处理的土壤则没有抑制作用。相比之下,传统土壤的 RKN 数量增加了 1319%。在这项研究中,共检测到 6770 多个细菌类群和 558 个真菌类群,其中真菌纲、放线菌纲、毛霉纲、球菌纲、姬松茸纲、双孢子纲和多孢子纲始终与 RKN 抑制作用相关。我们发现,受 SMNP 保护的土壤中真菌多样性更高。总之,土壤保护可增强土壤生态系统的恢复能力,受保护的阿干土壤可作为可持续管理植物寄生线虫的宝贵生物制剂来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
Gut microbiota and antibiotic resistance genes in endangered migratory Scaly-sided merganser (Mergus squamatus) in northeast China Phylogeography and population genomics of the critically endangered aquatic plant Caldesia grandis in China Insect conservation in agricultural landscapes needs both high crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitats Conservation agriculture compared to conventional tillage improves the trade-off between ground-dwelling arthropod trophic groups for natural pest regulation in cotton cropping systems Applying the driver-pressure-state-impact-response model to ecological restoration: A case study of comprehensive zoning and benefit assessment in Zhejiang Province, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1