Evaluating the Utility of the MSTI Assay in Predicting Compound Promiscuity and Cytotoxicity

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00243
Laken Kruger, Deborah K. Ngan, Tuan Xu, Li Zhang, Menghang Xia, Anton Simeonov, Ruili Huang
{"title":"Evaluating the Utility of the MSTI Assay in Predicting Compound Promiscuity and Cytotoxicity","authors":"Laken Kruger, Deborah K. Ngan, Tuan Xu, Li Zhang, Menghang Xia, Anton Simeonov, Ruili Huang","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonspecific reactive chemicals often interfere with the interpretation of high-throughput assay results because of their promiscuity and/or cytotoxicity. Using a high-throughput assay to identify such compounds is necessary to efficiently rule out potential assay artifacts. The MSTI, (<i>E</i>)-2-(4-mercaptostyryl)-1,3,3-trimethyl-3<i>H</i>-indol-1-ium, assay uses a thiol-containing fluorescent probe to screen for electrophile reactivity and could potentially be used to determine nonspecific reactive compounds. The Tox21 10K compound library was previously screened against a panel of ∼80 cell-based and biochemical assays, including the biochemical MSTI assay. In this study, we compared the MSTI assay activity of the Tox21 10K compounds with their promiscuity and cytotoxicity as reflected by their activities across the Tox21 assay panel to determine: (1) if this assay is predictive of a compound’s promiscuity and cytotoxicity and (2) what chemical features create inconsistent results between the MSTI assay activity and promiscuity/cytotoxicity (false negatives and false positives). We found that the MSTI assay can predict a chemical’s promiscuity/cytotoxicity with a 0.55 sensitivity and 0.97 specificity. Out of 3,407 unique compounds evaluated, we identified 92 false positive and 227 false negative results. Several structural features such as carboxamides and alkyl halides were found to be apparent in 53% (<i>p</i> = 2.4 × 10<sup>–07</sup>) and 19% (<i>p</i> = 4.3 × 10<sup>–06</sup>) of the false positives and negatives, respectively. The results of this analysis will help identify the potential challenges of this high-throughput assay and allow researchers to identify if a compound will be cytotoxic or promiscuous in an efficient manner.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonspecific reactive chemicals often interfere with the interpretation of high-throughput assay results because of their promiscuity and/or cytotoxicity. Using a high-throughput assay to identify such compounds is necessary to efficiently rule out potential assay artifacts. The MSTI, (E)-2-(4-mercaptostyryl)-1,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indol-1-ium, assay uses a thiol-containing fluorescent probe to screen for electrophile reactivity and could potentially be used to determine nonspecific reactive compounds. The Tox21 10K compound library was previously screened against a panel of ∼80 cell-based and biochemical assays, including the biochemical MSTI assay. In this study, we compared the MSTI assay activity of the Tox21 10K compounds with their promiscuity and cytotoxicity as reflected by their activities across the Tox21 assay panel to determine: (1) if this assay is predictive of a compound’s promiscuity and cytotoxicity and (2) what chemical features create inconsistent results between the MSTI assay activity and promiscuity/cytotoxicity (false negatives and false positives). We found that the MSTI assay can predict a chemical’s promiscuity/cytotoxicity with a 0.55 sensitivity and 0.97 specificity. Out of 3,407 unique compounds evaluated, we identified 92 false positive and 227 false negative results. Several structural features such as carboxamides and alkyl halides were found to be apparent in 53% (p = 2.4 × 10–07) and 19% (p = 4.3 × 10–06) of the false positives and negatives, respectively. The results of this analysis will help identify the potential challenges of this high-throughput assay and allow researchers to identify if a compound will be cytotoxic or promiscuous in an efficient manner.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 MSTI 分析法在预测化合物杂合性和细胞毒性方面的实用性
非特异性反应化学物质由于其杂交性和/或细胞毒性,往往会干扰高通量检测结果的解读。要有效排除潜在的检测假象,就必须使用高通量检测方法来鉴定此类化合物。MSTI((E)-2-(4-巯基丙烯酰基)-1,3,3-三甲基-3H-吲哚-1-鎓)检测法使用含巯基的荧光探针来筛选亲电子反应性,可用于确定非特异性反应性化合物。此前,Tox21 10K 化合物库已通过包括生化 MSTI 检测在内的 80 种细胞和生化检测方法进行了筛选。在本研究中,我们比较了 Tox21 10K 化合物的 MSTI 检测活性和它们在 Tox21 检测面板中的活性所反映的杂交性和细胞毒性,以确定:(1) 该检测是否能预测化合物的杂交性和细胞毒性;(2) 哪些化学特征会导致 MSTI 检测活性和杂交性/细胞毒性之间出现不一致的结果(假阴性和假阳性)。我们发现,MSTI 检测法能以 0.55 的灵敏度和 0.97 的特异性预测化学品的杂交性/细胞毒性。在评估的 3,407 种独特化合物中,我们发现了 92 个假阳性结果和 227 个假阴性结果。在假阳性和假阴性结果中,分别有 53% (p = 2.4 × 10-07) 和 19% (p = 4.3 × 10-06) 的化合物具有羧酰胺和烷基卤化物等结构特征。这项分析的结果将有助于确定这种高通量测定的潜在挑战,并使研究人员能够以有效的方式确定化合物是具有细胞毒性还是具有杂合性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1