Enacting the border multiple in the post-welfare state: Registration of foreign-born persons in Finland

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1177/23996544241282655
Anitta Kynsilehto, Marja Alastalo
{"title":"Enacting the border multiple in the post-welfare state: Registration of foreign-born persons in Finland","authors":"Anitta Kynsilehto, Marja Alastalo","doi":"10.1177/23996544241282655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses border practices that are enacted through an array of migrants’ residence registration procedures in Finland. These practices extend to the country of departure and also take place upon arrival and settlement within a municipality, and they are intimately tied with the person’s access to social rights in the country. Building on critical border studies and Annemarie Mol’s idea of multiple ontologies we examine migrant stories, collected via multi-sited ethnography, that simultaneously testify to being targeted by diverse border practices and of being compelled to take part in doing the border. We address regulatory practices that modify and, indeed, reinforce inequalities between migrants. We argue that residence registration as a scattered border practice not only enacts different statuses for migrants but orders them hierarchically depending, for example, on the person’s migration status and nationality (EU/TCN). Furthermore, multiple regimes of knowledge production such as statistics on migrant population draw on the data recorded in the population register during the municipal registration process, which further extends the impact of this data. We show how the welfare state system, claimed to be universal, is highly conjunctural depending on the information the person receives from different interlocutors, and on the presumably apolitical “policy on the fly” enacted at the registration desk.","PeriodicalId":48108,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning C-Politics and Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241282655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses border practices that are enacted through an array of migrants’ residence registration procedures in Finland. These practices extend to the country of departure and also take place upon arrival and settlement within a municipality, and they are intimately tied with the person’s access to social rights in the country. Building on critical border studies and Annemarie Mol’s idea of multiple ontologies we examine migrant stories, collected via multi-sited ethnography, that simultaneously testify to being targeted by diverse border practices and of being compelled to take part in doing the border. We address regulatory practices that modify and, indeed, reinforce inequalities between migrants. We argue that residence registration as a scattered border practice not only enacts different statuses for migrants but orders them hierarchically depending, for example, on the person’s migration status and nationality (EU/TCN). Furthermore, multiple regimes of knowledge production such as statistics on migrant population draw on the data recorded in the population register during the municipal registration process, which further extends the impact of this data. We show how the welfare state system, claimed to be universal, is highly conjunctural depending on the information the person receives from different interlocutors, and on the presumably apolitical “policy on the fly” enacted at the registration desk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在后福利国家实施边境多重管理:芬兰外国出生者的登记
本文分析了通过一系列移民在芬兰的居住登记手续而形成的边境惯例。这些实践延伸至出发国,也发生在抵达和定居在一个城市时,它们与个人在该国获得社会权利密切相关。以批判性边境研究和安妮玛丽-莫尔(Annemarie Mol)的多重本体论思想为基础,我们研究了通过多地点民族志收集的移民故事。我们探讨了那些改变甚至强化移民之间不平等的监管措施。我们认为,居住登记作为一种分散的边境实践,不仅为移民制定了不同的身份,而且还根据个人的移民身份和国籍(欧盟/中国)等因素对其进行分级排序。此外,在市政登记过程中,多种知识生产制度(如移民人口统计数据)会利用人口登记册中记录的数据,这进一步扩大了这些数据的影响。我们展示了号称普遍的福利国家制度是如何根据个人从不同对话者那里获得的信息,以及在登记台制定的假定非政治性的 "即时政策",而具有高度关联性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
The struggle against post-truth politics has always been about white supremacy: Lessons from the informational praxis of SNCC Corrigendum to “Beyond displacement: The role of real-estate valuations in shaping urban displaceability” Exploring commoning in the anthropocene. Introducing the concept of the election commons as a response to socio-ecological crisis. The case of Skouries, Greece Communities of exposure, community as exposure: Thinking collective life in the police abolitionist movement Constructing a governmental vision of happiness: Insights from Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1