Is the wrongness of murder a universal moral hinge?

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/phin.12439
Ryan Manhire
{"title":"Is the wrongness of murder a universal moral hinge?","authors":"Ryan Manhire","doi":"10.1111/phin.12439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper challenges a dualistic picture popularised by Nigel Pleasants at the centre of influential investigations into the possibility of Wittgensteinian forms of moral certainty. The dualistic picture takes it for granted that moral certainty concerns both a series of hinge propositions that are beyond doubt, make no sense to justify and cannot be expressed in ordinary discourse and a phenomenon that is only ever instantiated in our ways of acting. I consider tensions in this account as they relate to ‘Murder is wrong’ as a moral hinge proposition by drawing on the life and lyrics of US hip‐hop artist Kendrick Lamar. My claim is that the Lamar example highlights important tensions in our relation to the wrongness of murder that many would understand to occur within the moral realm, but which are conceptually ruled out from dualistic accounts of moral certainty. The plausibility of the dualistic picture must therefore be reassessed.","PeriodicalId":47112,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper challenges a dualistic picture popularised by Nigel Pleasants at the centre of influential investigations into the possibility of Wittgensteinian forms of moral certainty. The dualistic picture takes it for granted that moral certainty concerns both a series of hinge propositions that are beyond doubt, make no sense to justify and cannot be expressed in ordinary discourse and a phenomenon that is only ever instantiated in our ways of acting. I consider tensions in this account as they relate to ‘Murder is wrong’ as a moral hinge proposition by drawing on the life and lyrics of US hip‐hop artist Kendrick Lamar. My claim is that the Lamar example highlights important tensions in our relation to the wrongness of murder that many would understand to occur within the moral realm, but which are conceptually ruled out from dualistic accounts of moral certainty. The plausibility of the dualistic picture must therefore be reassessed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谋杀的错误性是一个普遍的道德问题吗?
本文对奈杰尔-普莱桑斯(Nigel Pleasants)在对维特根斯坦形式的道德确定性的可能性进行的有影响力的研究中提出的二元论观点提出质疑。二元论图景想当然地认为,道德确定性既涉及一系列毋庸置疑、无意义且无法用普通话语表述的关键命题,也涉及一种只有在我们的行为方式中才能体现的现象。我从美国嘻哈歌手肯德里克-拉马尔(Kendrick Lamar)的生平和歌词出发,探讨了 "谋杀是错的 "这一道德关键命题在这一论述中的紧张关系。我的主张是,拉马尔的例子凸显了我们与 "谋杀是错的 "关系中的重要紧张关系,许多人认为这些紧张关系发生在道德领域,但却被道德确定性的二元论概念所排除。因此,必须重新评估二元论图景的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
66.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophical Investigations features articles in every branch of philosophy. Whether focusing on traditional or on new aspects of the subject, it offers thought-provoking articles and maintains a lively readership with an acclaimed discussion section and wide-ranging book reviews. Special issues are published on topics of current philosophical interest.
期刊最新文献
Wittgenstein's critical Philosophy of Mathematical Practice Geometric diagrams as an effective notation Language, Mind and Value By SeverinSchroeder, London: Anthem. 2024 Is the wrongness of murder a universal moral hinge? Wittgenstein on mathematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1