Molecular epidemiology of Cercospora leaf spot on resistant and susceptible sugar beet hybrids

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Plant Pathology Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1111/ppa.13998
Chen Chen, Harald Keunecke, Enzo Neu, Friedrich J. Kopisch‐Obuch, Bruce A. McDonald, Jessica Stapley
{"title":"Molecular epidemiology of Cercospora leaf spot on resistant and susceptible sugar beet hybrids","authors":"Chen Chen, Harald Keunecke, Enzo Neu, Friedrich J. Kopisch‐Obuch, Bruce A. McDonald, Jessica Stapley","doi":"10.1111/ppa.13998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cercospora leaf spot (CLS), caused by <jats:italic>Cercospora beticola</jats:italic>, is a major foliar disease impacting sugar beet production worldwide. The development of new resistant sugar beet hybrids is a powerful tool to better manage the disease, but it is unclear how these hybrids affect CLS epidemiology. We used a molecular epidemiology approach to study natural epidemics of CLS affecting two susceptible and two resistant sugar beet hybrids at two field sites. Infected plants were geotagged on a weekly basis. Isolations of <jats:italic>C</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>beticola</jats:italic> were made from infected leaves and genotyped using six simple‐sequence repeat loci to identify clones. We determined that CLS epidemics had a later onset in plots planted to resistant hybrids, but once the pathogen established an infection, there was little difference between resistant and susceptible hybrids in the probability of localized spread and dispersal. We found that different clones often infected the same leaf and that clusters of infected plants were often colonized by a mixture of clones. There was little overall difference in genetic diversity of <jats:italic>C</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>beticola</jats:italic> collected on resistant and susceptible hybrids; however, genotypic diversity was lower on the resistant hybrid at one site, suggestive of a selection bottleneck. At the end of the epidemic infections were not randomly distributed across the fields and we found that a single clone could spread over a distance of 100 m during a growing season.","PeriodicalId":20075,"journal":{"name":"Plant Pathology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cercospora leaf spot (CLS), caused by Cercospora beticola, is a major foliar disease impacting sugar beet production worldwide. The development of new resistant sugar beet hybrids is a powerful tool to better manage the disease, but it is unclear how these hybrids affect CLS epidemiology. We used a molecular epidemiology approach to study natural epidemics of CLS affecting two susceptible and two resistant sugar beet hybrids at two field sites. Infected plants were geotagged on a weekly basis. Isolations of C. beticola were made from infected leaves and genotyped using six simple‐sequence repeat loci to identify clones. We determined that CLS epidemics had a later onset in plots planted to resistant hybrids, but once the pathogen established an infection, there was little difference between resistant and susceptible hybrids in the probability of localized spread and dispersal. We found that different clones often infected the same leaf and that clusters of infected plants were often colonized by a mixture of clones. There was little overall difference in genetic diversity of C. beticola collected on resistant and susceptible hybrids; however, genotypic diversity was lower on the resistant hybrid at one site, suggestive of a selection bottleneck. At the end of the epidemic infections were not randomly distributed across the fields and we found that a single clone could spread over a distance of 100 m during a growing season.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗性和易感性甜菜杂交种上 Cercospora 叶斑病的分子流行病学研究
由 Cercospora beticola 引起的 Cercospora 叶斑病(CLS)是影响全球甜菜生产的一种主要叶面病害。新的抗性甜菜杂交种的开发是更好地管理该病害的有力工具,但目前还不清楚这些杂交种如何影响 CLS 的流行。我们采用分子流行病学方法研究了在两个田间地点影响两种易感和两种抗性甜菜杂交种的 CLS 自然流行病。每周对受感染的植株进行地理标记。从受感染的叶片中分离出 C. beticola,并使用六个简单序列重复位点进行基因分型,以确定克隆。我们发现,在种植抗性杂交种的地块中,CLS流行病的发病时间较晚,但病原体一旦形成感染,抗性杂交种和易感杂交种在局部传播和扩散的概率上差别不大。我们发现,不同的克隆往往会感染同一片叶子,受感染的植株群往往由混合克隆定殖。在抗性杂交种和易感杂交种上收集到的 C. beticola 遗传多样性总体差异不大;但在一个地点,抗性杂交种的基因型多样性较低,这表明存在选择瓶颈。在疫情结束时,感染并不是随机分布在田间的,我们发现在一个生长季节中,一个克隆的传播距离可达 100 米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Pathology
Plant Pathology 生物-农艺学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This international journal, owned and edited by the British Society for Plant Pathology, covers all aspects of plant pathology and reaches subscribers in 80 countries. Top quality original research papers and critical reviews from around the world cover: diseases of temperate and tropical plants caused by fungi, bacteria, viruses, phytoplasmas and nematodes; physiological, biochemical, molecular, ecological, genetic and economic aspects of plant pathology; disease epidemiology and modelling; disease appraisal and crop loss assessment; and plant disease control and disease-related crop management.
期刊最新文献
Meloidogyne hapla dominates plant‐parasitic nematode communities associated with kiwifruit orchards in Portugal The growth‐promoting effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W82T‐44 on soybean and its biocontrol potential against soybean Phytophthora root rot Genetic diversity and incidence of cassava bacterial blight (CBB) caused by Xanthomonas phaseoli pv. manihotis in Burkina Faso Control of root rot of red raspberries caused by Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi Molecular epidemiology of Cercospora leaf spot on resistant and susceptible sugar beet hybrids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1